Ina Cognito
Lurking the web since 1995
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2013
- Messages
- 358
- Reaction score
- 1
Was this a 15 min break or lunch break?
While I understand that Rachel is a wreck over the trial and the facts of the case, I hope if she is recalled to the stand she is able to collect herself a bit.
I hope and believe the jury will have found her to be a sympathetic witness, but if she continues to "fall apart" on the stand, it would be pretty easy for them to dismiss her testimony on the basis of it being overly emotional.
Specifically, the point she made about her father single-handedly carrying large sheets of drywall seemingly with ease was very important and serves to argue against his claim that he was physically unable to remove his wife from the tub. However, she was so agitated when she recounted this, it was less impactful.
The next time (if there is one), she should acknowledge the jury with a little nod as a way of communicating to them that she is going to do her best to remain collected and she should do her level best to do so.
Also, as unpopular as this comment may be, I think she should style her hair away from her face. The hair, which obscured her face, appeared almost a veil and it contributed to her looking a bit furtive.
Was this a 15 min break or lunch break?
Minor, so glad you are here. I posted about some concerns I had regarding Rachel's medical records up thread. After reading them, would you mind giving us your legal take on it? TIA
The Court can order the medical records turned over from the provider. It could also be that the records were in the MacNeill home and were seized as part of a search warrant - in which case the prosecution would have to turn them over the defense.
I was following him lol But, I have a semi working knowledge of what he was talking about. The jury? Oh hell no lol
I was doing today's Sudoku yahoo. Friday is always the toughest puzzle and between that and what the heck that witness was saying I felt like I needed a drool cloth.
But why were her medical records not protected, even though they may have been turned over?
I suspect there was some pretrial hearing to deal with this, but essentially once there is an order for the medical provider to disclose the information - that essentially overrides the privilege.
Are they just covering the medication she had in her system?
Anti-colen...what?? Good lawd... never heard that word before, can't even remember it to look it up.