- Joined
- Jan 23, 2022
- Messages
- 147
- Reaction score
- 1,333
Yeah, this article is a tough read.The article you linked is going to take me time to digest. I first read it and it just made me really angry.
From that article:
“Shah said removal and other punitive measures aren’t effective solutions because behavior in an escalated state in many cases is “involuntary,” and the result is that students can’t comprehend that the punishments are being meted out later to disincentivize them from the in-the-moment behavior.”
To me the point of removal isn’t just to disincentivize behavior but also to protect the other students. The person quoted here seems to miss that.
Also this shooting seems to have been planned, and therefore very voluntary, not “in-the-moment”. I know the child is only six, and it is hard to believe a six-year-old really could have done all this intentionally, but it seems he did. With all the warning signs prior to this incident, this child should not have been in the class at all but according to the person quoted here, removal from class isn’t the answer.
I also worry about what other kids learn from violent scenarios playing out in their classroom, especially when they see few / minimal consequences for the violence. They must feel scared of what could happen to them at school and that adults may not be able to protect them. And when they see teachers who experience violence in the classroom get blamed for that violence due to not catering to the individualized needs in an IEP, like in the case of the Arizona student mentioned in the article, I worry that kids learn that it’s OK to be violent. That Arizona case was really something - the child in that case really broke two adults’ glasses, and then the school got sued for suspending her.
This case has really got me thinking about gun violence in school and the origins of it. I previously thought access to guns was the primary issue (I still do) but I didn’t realize extent to which some school environments now seem almost to facilitate violence by failing to address it adequately.
I know there is a need for confidentiality due to the age of the shooter, but I really hope we get more information about the home life of this child, his particular disability, how he accessed the gun, and how his 6-year-old mind could have premeditated this. There is a lot to be learned from this case and I hope we all learn from it.