From the linked article:
"The investigation is vast, and Drew said the mother who owned the gun is cooperating. Drew declined to say whether the investigation shows negligence on the part of the child’s parents – if that is what the investigation will reveal.“I appreciate the question, and I understand it,” Drew said, “but I will not cross that line. … I will not compromise the investigation.”
This stands out to me. In almost every other case we ever hear about in the MSM where a child was in possession of a loaded gun (whether there was injury or not) the parent of that child is almost always arrested and charged.
In this case however, after local LE
with the assistance of federal ATF agents, the home was searched, records from human services (and other services) have been searched, they've stated that the mother is cooperating and have also stated
they think they know how this happened and yet... still no arrest and still no charges. To me, this lends a lot of credibility to the family's statement that the gun
was secured and that
“Our family has always been committed to responsible gun ownership and keeping firearms out of the reach of children.” Family of 6-year-old who shot his teacher issues statement
I think it's possible this case could be the exception to the general rule, that kids with guns come from irresponsible, reckless homes where the gun was in easy access.
jmo