Considering the suspect was charged with just abduction it sounds like she is still alive. Just IMO from going off the only facts we have right now.
Considering the suspect was charged with just abduction it sounds like she is still alive. Just IMO from going off the only facts we have right now.
I think it means they have no evidence yet to say otherwise. But if is alive, why wasn't she with her abductor?
I had a feeling something was gonna happen too. Like I said before something was already up that I just didn't see how the FBI just on the case so fast unless because of "Family connections" .. To me that meant someone in her family, jmo. A lot of people thought by that they meant a family member was part of the FBI, but even then the FBI has certain protocols and steps they have to take in order to take on a case unless of course this was already part of a crime. IMO her car was just too close to her grandmas house to my liking. Of course these are just are my opinion. I'm honestly sick to my stomach. All we can do know is pray,pray,pray..
Considering the suspect was charged with just abduction it sounds like she is still alive. Just IMO from going off the only facts we have right now.
Considering the suspect was charged with just abduction it sounds like she is still alive. Just IMO from going off the only facts we have right now.
I pray she is still alive, but just because they only arrested him for abduction doesn't necessarily mean she's still alive. If they have no proof of her whereabouts whether she's alive or dead they can still only arrest him for abduction because they may have proof of that, just nothing else. They can't arrest you without proof for a specific crime.
After two of the articles on this website posted today, I think we have a Websleuths reader on the staff!
http://www.insidenova.com/news/crim...cle_252d9606-02de-11e3-ae2e-0019bb2963f4.html
I'm just not ready to leap that it is connected to a family member. The FBI can't assume jurisdiction for that purpose either.