VA - Amy Bradley, 23, Petersburg, 24 March 1998 - #2 - ***READ FIRST POST***

[Dushi]

I was talking about PB ....

NOT SC. I never stated a fact about sc . I stated that PB was mentioned (same PB FA mentioned , same one who ran the margarita island brothel) in a natalee holloway discussion in 2006.

And that's fact.

Thats correct, you didn't state a fact, you posted another persons opinion
In post 1711, you stated the PI said it and that you did not believe it was a rumour

 

[Saracen]

I just found it striking that someone a verified poster told us to sleuthe popped up in another missing american persons case , in the same geographical area , and somewhat similar circumstances ...

"follow the music" for some reason is striking to me as well ... I can't put my finger on it , maybe the band w/yellow ?

I've also heard that Steve Croes / or his father was on the Rhapsody of the Seas during the time Amy was ...

I've seen this posted in a few web articles ...

I don't know , but we need to get this girl HOME !!!


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

This is what i was reffering too,and no you did not state it as fact that is why I am asking, has it been proved that the two were related ANYONE?..

 

[Dushi]

This is what i was reffering too,and no you did not state it as fact that is why I am asking, has it been proved that the two were related ANYONE?..

LOL

AFAIK it was dismissed earlier in the thread

 

[dotr]

The bed head frame, has been noted to be nothing special, yet finding an exact duplicate of one has been tricky so far- I mean there has been some" good but no cigar" findings posted,but no exact replicas...
It just seems to be the ultimate iron(y) to have this big full heart, framing a tortured- looking girl, posing on a bed. imo.

 

[dotr]

Repost, Amy website- includes Vanished episodes,Part 1-5
http://www.amybradley.net/

 

[nosyone]

In the first picture .. when I zoomed in , i see circles around the eyes . It looks like the photo was written on ...

Could she be wearing glasses in the first photo ? Zoom in guys and you'll see what I'm taking about ... It's almost like the eyes were purposely distorted or she was wearing glasses.

You are very good at zooming in, could you please zoom in on the nightstand which seems to contain some sort of book or publication? Thank you in advance for any help!

 

[Randolph2911]

You are very good at zooming in, could you please zoom in on the nightstand which seems to contain some sort of book or publication? Thank you in advance for any help!

I tried to last night , but the nightstand is very difficult to make out about what's on it.... but I will try and post if I think I see anything.

I'd like to note that looking at the "glasses photo" , it appears someone drew circles around her eyes ...

I am aware photo distortion can make people see strange things , but I'm pretty sure the pixels that make circles around her eyes are done with a pen as they have nothing in common with anything else in the picture . They are obviously circles ...

So I'm curious now .. why there was any debate about this woman being Amy ? I know that a blog posted it and there was a lot of talk and debate regarding the photos before they were on doctor phills show ... But still , I don't see how dr Phil's experts came to the conclusion "it's prob. Amy".

THAT IS AMY !!!

I'm not great with photo imaging .. but again I don't think it takes an expert to see the ring , the discoloration (obvious) on her shoulder ... and the eyes in the photo (that looks like glasses)

I've never seen this stuff mentioned and with all I've read (tons and tons of pages and a lot of hours) , for some reason I never "took a real great look/examine" the photos .

I think dotr really made a big discovery with seeing that ring. I credit dotr for inspiring me to take a hard look at the pics .

I think everyone on here is great and hopefully we can get Amy where she belongs ! I wish the verified poster would come back on here !

 

[neesaki]

I tried to last night , but the nightstand is very difficult to make out about what's on it.... but I will try and post if I think I see anything.

I'd like to note that looking at the "glasses photo" , it appears someone drew circles around her eyes ...

I am aware photo distortion can make people see strange things , but I'm pretty sure the pixels that make circles around her eyes are done with a pen as they have nothing in common with anything else in the picture . They are obviously circles ...

So I'm curious now .. why there was any debate about this woman being Amy ? I know that a blog posted it and there was a lot of talk and debate regarding the photos before they were on doctor phills show ... But still , I don't see how dr Phil's experts came to the conclusion "it's prob. Amy".

THAT IS AMY !!!

I'm not great with photo imaging .. but again I don't think it takes an expert to see the ring , the discoloration (obvious) on her shoulder ... and the eyes in the photo (that looks like glasses)

I've never seen this stuff mentioned and with all I've read (tons and tons of pages and a lot of hours) , for some reason I never "took a real great look/examine" the photos .

I think dotr really made a big discovery with seeing that ring. I credit dotr for inspiring me to take a hard look at the pics .

I think everyone on here is great and hopefully we can get Amy where she belongs ! I wish the verified poster would come back on here !

I'm not saying the photo isn't Amy, in fact, I may be one of the few who believes it is her. To me, there's no doubt it is her.

Concerning the "glasses", though, did she ever even wear glasses? I just don't see that in the photo. I do see something, some granular, discoloration around her eyes, bruises? Just don't see it as being glasses, buts that's jmo. Plus, I don't have the greatest eyes, lol.

BTW, since we're talking about the photo, what do you think that is on Amy's right wrist? TIA

 

[neesaki]

Something else that's been on my mind, is there any way we can find out if Amy's family can be protected by something similar to the Witness Protection Program? Considering the alleged threats against her family, would it be possible to bring Amy home without something such as this? I have no knowledge if the FBI offers this in these type of situations. For anyone with information on this, TIA.

 

[Randolph2911]

Something else that's been on my mind, is there any way we can find out if Amy's family can be protected by something similar to the Witness Protection Program? Considering the alleged threats against her family, would it be possible to bring Amy home without something such as this? I have no knowledge if the FBI offers this in these type of situations. For anyone with information on this, TIA.

Wow ... Another thing I never noticed

I'm about to go to sleep . Tomorrow I will definitely look close .

Jmo from a quick glance that doesn't seem to be a watch.

 

[Randolph2911]

I wish all the posters would come back , I think we may be on a good path ... I haven't seen many of these picture notes discussed !!

 

[Randolph2911]

The only thing I can say as an opinion about the wrist is that IMO I do not feel its a watch. I just spent an hour trying to get clues from the photos ... and again , the "glasses" / face on that photo strike me as most odd.

I hope this better shows the circles I am referring to ... It almost seems like the photos were marked with a pen and scanned ?

There is definitely something on her eyes that are not photo distortion ... I can't say the same about the wrist but I just don't feel it's a watch based on my observations. Here's some of what I did ...

"glasses photo"

I really am baffled as to why the eyes are altered ... as well as the shoulder tattoo photo.

It's just so obvious that (even when looking at the photo hard) that there is distortion over the shoulder that doesn't add up with the rest of the pixels.

 

[neesaki]

Wow ... Another thing I never noticed

I'm about to go to sleep . Tomorrow I will definitely look close .

Jmo from a quick glance that doesn't seem to be a watch.

It has been brought up by another poster earlier on, as to possibility of that being a tether around her wrist.

 

[neesaki]

It seems plausible that they were purposely covering up the tattoo, thus the what appears to be distortion/alteration or patch, whatever it is, in that area on her shoulder.

I don't understand the thing with the eye area either.

The entire photo is of horrible quality, worse than the others. It almost looks like it was altered and/or reproduced many times, or, as you mentioned, perhaps scanned. Maybe they didn't have the kind of technology available to just upload the photo as is so available here and today.

One thing that stands out in that particular photo is that it's apparent that she, Amy if it is her, was obviously not a willing participant but doing it under duress and was extremely uncomfortable.

Not the kind of photo to be posted on an escort website, as has been previously pointed out.

 

[Randolph2911]

what is a tether ? Like a leash type thing ?

Iirc the parents stated they felt piracy may be invloved. I personally thought pirates were "characters" and didn't realize they were "real".

Apparently there is a lot of discussion regarding maritime piracy ... I found this when reading a fishing report and saw a link about "piracy" and remembered the mention by the family and then googled maritime piracy and found this ...

Attacks against cruise ships are rare but do occur. The Department of State is aware of two such attacks and one attempt in 2008. There have also been several attacks against private vessels such as yachts. The Department is unaware of any injuries or fatalities involving American citizens resulting from these attacks.

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/piracy/piracy_4420.html

Does anyone know more about "pirates" ? I am reading now , but am still lost as all I see is warnings.

What do modern "pirates" do ?

 

[Randolph2911]

It seems plausible that they were purposely covering up the tattoo, thus the what appears to be distortion/alteration or patch, whatever it is, in that area on her shoulder.

I don't understand the thing with the eye area either.

The entire photo is of horrible quality, worse than the others. It almost looks like it was altered and/or reproduced many times, or, as you mentioned, perhaps scanned. Maybe they didn't have the kind of technology available to just upload the photo as is so available here and today.

One thing that stands out in that particular photo is that it's apparent that she, Amy if it is her, was obviously not a willing participant but doing it under duress and was extremely uncomfortable.

Not the kind of photo to be posted on an escort website, as has been previously pointed out.

I totally IMO agree ...

I wonder if the family had been threatened , or are in protection ... if it would be known by the public ?

I have felt since first seeing the pictures .. and knowing the location they were posted (AAV website) , that they were out of place (even for a company like AAV) when compared to other photos ... and that the pics were posted for a reason (besides escorting).

Now after examining the pictures I am more convinced these photos were a message to someone , or a threat to the family.

IMO whoever took Amy knew that brothel websites would most likely be looked at by authorities / investigators / family members , so I feeljmo it might be have been a deliberate place to put them.

I feel so bad for the family of Amy , god knows what's going on with the wackos that took her ...

And side notation I posted the piracy link because of the family's statement along with the fact FA said that he or she doesn't feel organized crime is Invloved.

 

[Spotlight]

Here's a story about a British couple kidnapped by pirates, as far as I can remember there were a few incidents that happened around the same time. They seemed to hold people/boats for ransom rather than kidnap them and they are never seen again. Also if you google "modern day pirates" you will see more instances of kidnap for ransom


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...yacht-couple-kidnapped-pirates-appeal-PM.html

 

[neesaki]

I totally IMO agree ...

I wonder if the family had been threatened , or are in protection ... if it would be known by the public ?

I have felt since first seeing the pictures .. and knowing the location they were posted (AAV website) , that they were out of place (even for a company like AAV) when compared to other photos ... and that the pics were posted for a reason (besides escorting).

Now after examining the pictures I am more convinced these photos were a message to someone , or a threat to the family.

IMO whoever took Amy knew that brothel websites would most likely be looked at by authorities / investigators / family members , so I feeljmo it might be have been a deliberate place to put them.

I feel so bad for the family of Amy , god knows what's going on with the wackos that took her ...

And side notation I posted the piracy link because of the family's statement along with the fact FA said that he or she doesn't feel organized crime is Invloved.

I think it's a strong possibility that Amy's captors have threatened her with the safety of her family, which could at least partially explain why she would not try to escape even when in a public place on US soil, given that the sighting in SF is for sure legitimate, jmo.

There does seem to be some contradiction regarding whether it is believed organized crime is involved. How could this type of crime not be "organized", when it is so apparent that so many people were involved.
Maybe there are varying definitions of what "organized" crime is?

http://25missingpersons.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=amybradley&action=print&thread=65

THE BRADLEYS BELIEVE, MOST FERVENTLY, THAT AMY LYNN IS STILL ALIVE AND MAY BE HELD IN AN ORGANIZED CRIME CONTROLLED BORDELLO IN VENEZUELA: THE REWARD FOR HER SAFE RETURN IS $ 250,000 US.

 

[neesaki]

what is a tether ? Like a leash type thing ?

That's right.

 

[nosyone]

The only thing I can say as an opinion about the wrist is that IMO I do not feel its a watch. I just spent an hour trying to get clues from the photos ... and again , the "glasses" / face on that photo strike me as most odd.

I hope this better shows the circles I am referring to ... It almost seems like the photos were marked with a pen and scanned ?

There is definitely something on her eyes that are not photo distortion ... I can't say the same about the wrist but I just don't feel it's a watch based on my observations. Here's some of what I did ...

"glasses photo"

I really am baffled as to why the eyes are altered ... as well as the shoulder tattoo photo.

It's just so obvious that (even when looking at the photo hard) that there is distortion over the shoulder that doesn't add up with the rest of the pixels.

Earlier, someone posted about possible words across the photo, do you think that the circle is a part of a letter or letter?