- Joined
- Oct 10, 2014
- Messages
- 15,724
- Reaction score
- 44,208
The father being 'convicted' of AWOL, is Article 86 of the UCMJ. It is not the same as desertion (Article 87) which would likely end up in a court martial. Most AWOL cases are taken to non-judicial punishment (NJP). In the Navy that would be Captain's Mast and in the USMC I believe it is called Office Hours. I don't remember the Army or USAF terms for NJP. Neither is considered a court martial. A result under NJP is not a conviction since it is not a criminal proceeding. That said, the CO offers NJP to the offender and the offender has the right to request a court martial.
NJP results can show up in a background check. But either this was poor reporting or the father chose court martial. If he chose court martial over NJP for an AWOL incident there is either something else involved or he made a poor choice. If the judge is stating the AWOL 'conviction' is concerning then there is something else here that is present but not in the article.
BBM i think it just means he should not get bail because he has a history of not appearing.