That's so strange about LE rescinding on the contents/intent of the text. How would autocorrect lead to street names that are verifiably known to Hannah, and close to where she was last seen? Unless the issue is the word "lost," but I just played around with my phone for a bit and it's hard to see what else that could've been. The "lots of things happen when texts get sent" comment kind of sounds like backtracking, IMO directed at a POI (whether known or unknown). Sort of reminds me of Willow Long's case in which LE already had their eyes on the suspect because of his behavior when she was first reported missing, but they still made statements to the effect of "we think she is reenacting a princess adventure in a cornfield."
Sorry if this has been discussed (I hate pretending I know what I'm talking about when I talk about "pings"..) but what geographical information can be gleaned from a sent iMessage/text message? If it's discovered the message came from nowhere near the mentioned areas, that would be a good reason to detract.. and offer autocorrect as a crappy excuse.
I'm just too on the fence about whether or not a perp could've sent that. In Kelly Bordeaux's case, the fabricated text legitimately bought Nick time, unfortunately. "I think I'm just gonna grab a cab and crash" or "I just ran into some people and think I'll stay out with them, sorry to bail" etc etc would've made way more sense than a message that immediately confused/alarmed her friends the perp COULDN'T have ruled out that she didn't know the area. I'm thinking about my own university town if it were someone older, perhaps affiliated with the school/city, even they couldn't rule out that she knew the area if it's near or on the way to campus/other student housing. If the area COULD contain student housing etc, it's still a gamble. If the area contains neither, why would a student be stumbling around there? Cause for immediate concern on behalf of whoever received the text.
If a perp sent it, he's not local, and picked a random intersection. One that is very far from where he actually went with her.
If she sent it.. she must've been impaired in a very strange way beyond just being drunk. Specific location, general coherency, but nonsensical conclusion. I've been drunk and lost before in college (shame/regret, trust me) and immediately called friends/boyfriend to stay on the phone with me and give me directions based on landmarks. Being drunk enough to make a decision so silly that late at night, I was barely able to describe the football stadium as I passed by. Texting someone cross streets..? If I could identify those I'd be using a map app on my phone.
Okay, back to the perp-sent-it side of the fence.
I also think the dogs must have traced her sent to where she would've gotten in a car. If the scent continued in a more ambiguous way, a general street/direction, I can't see LE not releasing that information, to increase tips/sightings etc. They must know a whole lot more, possibly making it look to a POI like they don't even know she was ever in a car.
All MOO.