- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
- Messages
- 5,171
- Reaction score
- 42,110
If this were to be a setback I feel we have come so far that short of a dictatorship taking over the country, a setback is nearly impossible (referring to dictatorships that control & imprison women).Right, we may not be thinking about them, but can we say a victim/survivor won't be more hesitant to come forward now?
We (women) have publicly taken on large companies, high profile individuals, networks etc. There is no longer a complete lack of awareness on sexual harassment in the workforce. It’s now become the fabric of HR departments to implement an entire system for SA. I don’t see any company doing away with it. So the question of a setback is such that it’s not setback-able. I realize that there are individuals who are still going to buck the system.
There will always be some victims who are afraid to come forward regardless of a setback or set-forward. But we are no longer talking about being the first to do & say anything. There is history and time that we can point to. The Me too movement has had a positive impact within the domestic realm also. It has provoked further discussion on better ways to help women.
If Johnnys or another male‘s case were to be overturned it would be a significant setback for the men-too movement because there is no history yet to fall back on. It would make a male feel more hesitant in going forward. That’s the difference between the two.
For any organization that claims Ambers case is a setback, is negating all that has been done.