- Joined
- Jul 22, 2021
- Messages
- 1,097
- Reaction score
- 9,489
Very curious if Brendan will take the stand, what do folks think?
Very curious if Brendan will take the stand, what do folks think?
Prosecution claimed in opening that the expert in blood splatter evidence is more important than au-pair Juliana's testimony.
Clunky and ill-prepared says Peter @ LYK.
![]()
How Blood Spatter Analysis Solves Crimes - Phlebotomy USA
Explore what blood pattern analysis is and how it helps solve crimes. Understand the science behind bloodstains and their role in crime scene investigations.www.phlebotomyusa.com
I don't think he'll testify.Very curious if Brendan will take the stand, what do folks think?
If the jury doesn't believe the prosecution's star witness au-pair Juliana then BB could walk.Everything about this trial feels clunky and ill-prepared.
JMO
I can’t figure out the significance of Christine’s father testifying about her blood disorder. And why couldn’t he mention what her medical condition was?
If the jury doesn't believe the prosecution's star witness au-pair Juliana then BB could walk.
I'm not up on much of this case and wish I knew how much evidence the prosecution had without whatever au-pair gave them about BB & Juliana's relationship leading up to the murders so did they really need to give au-pair a sweetheart deal?
The odds of two lovers who want the wife gone for good then miraculously some guy appears at your house to carry out a fetish and you don't know it was planned by the wife then get to kill the guy along with your wife is a zillion to one and something that a jury would have a real hard time swallowing.
imo
Defense kept objecting to what he called medical testimony by Christine's father. I do think he was permitted to say that she had a "blood disorder", but that was the extent of it, and nothing further. He said that she had to refrain from activities that would cause injury, and had to wear protective equipment when she did. I thought he would have testified about Christine's relationship with Brendan Banfield that he had observed over time.I can’t figure out the significance of Christine’s father testifying about her blood disorder. And why couldn’t he mention what her medical condition was?
Defense kept objecting to what he called medical testimony by Christine's father. I do think he was permitted to say that she had a "blood disorder", but that was the extent of it, and nothing further. He said that she had to refrain from activities that would cause injury, and had to wear protective equipment when she did. I thought he would have testified about Christine's relationship with Brendan Banfield that he had observed over time.
And not engage in fetish knife play with a complete stranger she had never met!!!Maybe to show that she wouldn't engage in rough anything? That she was careful, had to manage her health, protect herself from injury?
And not engage in fetish knife play with a complete stranger she had never met!!!