I would say less than 15 percent of Americans are aware of the murder of Scott Ratigan. Most people are not interested in true crime and have never heard of murders we have.My first thought when I saw alleged CEO shooter, LM was that he copied the clothes/backpack of SR's killer. Thank you for your post @Betty P, though I am just now getting to this thread.![]()
just reading this for the first time... if this really was some one from SR's past, maybe this person is not in the US any more... semester abroad anyone? maybe LE did not want to scare anyone into "fleeing" but maybe the killer had no intention of staying around. With the number of apts in these buildings, and the number of possible friends, etc visiting them, person could have been in the buildings before and known about the doors, arrangement of the hallways, building configuration.If the detectives do find evidence linking a suspect, what are the next steps?
Is a Grand Jury convened to determine if there is enough evidence to arrest a person?
I think of Scott’s family often and recognize the pain they have due to losing their son. They bumped the reward for information in the case a year or 2 ago.
<modsnip - posting info as FACT instead of clarifying it is OPINION ie IMHO/MOO etc. which is required on WS>
It does eliminate a lot of people even if it does not ID one.Sorry for the power posting, but I just have to think: Considering some recent cases (Missy Bevers, Liz Barraza, and this one) I have to really wonder why we even bother with security cameras. It seems like they're only helpful if the person isn't trying to disguise himself.
because of the timing and nothing stolen, it seems that this person knew SR and something about his schedule from social media- if you believe it was just a random person who tries to go in upscale condos and steal small items, the person did a bad job IMOI don't think that what the suspect is wearing or carrying would have attracted much notice. The D.C. area has a lot of people wearing black or navy, lots of dark colors. Also, with all the walkable areas, easy subway access/use, etc., carrying a backpack is totally normal. Another normal thing is lots of young professionals in the area, as well as many contract workers. Having lots of contractors means, in general, a more transient population (people maybe there for a 12 month contract), making it harder for eyewitnesses to pinpoint people who seem "out of place" and also that quite a few residents at the time of the murder may not even live in the area anymore.
Basically, this seems like finding a needle in a haystack as there is absolutely nothing odd or obvious that would make the suspect memorable in any way.
All my own opinions due to quite a bit of time traveling there over an extended period of time. MOO.
Ty for the fresh article, from link..Online communities devoted to the case have formed in the years since the homicide, with some citizen sleuths going so far as to produce detailed recaps. A lack of substantial updates led to calls for more information around this time last year.
![]()
Five years after unsolved Ballston homicide, police renew requests for tips | ARLnow.com
On the fifth anniversary of an unsolved Ballston homicide, police are renewing requests for tips as the victim's family continues to offer a $50,000 reward. Today (Friday) marks five years since police were dispatched to an apartment building on the 800 block of N. Randolph Street in early 2020...www.arlnow.com
Did I mention the general population of Americans in my post?I would say less than 15 percent of Americans are aware of the murder of Scott Ratigan. Most people are not interested in true crime and have never heard of murders we have.
Very possible. Like a K.Spacey in Usual SuspectsI feel like the gait is not their real way of walking. The suspect looks young, and someone with a gait like that who is young and in good shape would stand out. If that was their actually way of walking someone whom Scott knew would have probably recognized who the young, thin, person that walked like that was. Also, they seem to be moving pretty fast at times, like they have no real issues with walking. JMO
The surveillance is out of order for some reason. The first & fourth feeds are after & the middle feeds are before.Curious to know if the surveillance video of person of interest (POI) are before or after crime occurred? Not seeing any bleach spots on POI, which is interesting; and is it possible/probable another person involved? moo - only speculation
WATCH: Person of interest captured on surveillance video
I have to respectfully disagree - not that someone probably should have recognised it, but in terms of it not being their natural gait.I feel like the gait is not their real way of walking. The suspect looks young, and someone with a gait like that who is young and in good shape would stand out. If that was their actually way of walking someone whom Scott knew would have probably recognized who the young, thin, person that walked like that was. Also, they seem to be moving pretty fast at times, like they have no real issues with walking. JMO
He was home that day and someone who used to live in the building said there are no locks on the doorknob only one bolt above the knob. If he was expecting friends, maybe he left it unlocked so they could come in. He thought he was safe in a building that required a fob to enter and had security and a nice neighborhood. Could be a possibility IMO.Wow! I've learned much more from this video. The narrator shows how he was able to enter the building and even get on the elevator to the floor. I am now wondering how the killer got into the apartment. I would have thought Scott would have looked through a peep hole before opening the door. If the killer knew how to get in the building to the apartment, then the killer had to have come up with a way to get in the apartment.