Really? Did the Youngs' neighbor testify or did the State put in a picture of their vehicle?
imo
IIRC, it was Spivey who was asked, and he who replied. I don't recall the defense ever questioning Spivey about it.
Really? Did the Youngs' neighbor testify or did the State put in a picture of their vehicle?
imo
Really? Did the Youngs' neighbor testify or did the State put in a picture of their vehicle?
imo
I figured you'd be right.I deleted my post.
Otto, I truly believe you could be called as an expert in any case.
Thank you for all you do!!
Btw, you are right, the width seems to be the problem as well.
Can't wait to see SG43's demo.
Kim Young drove a medium Chevy Blazer in 2006.
The width is definitely a problem.
The width is definitely a problem.
what color?
Oh gosh, no need to delete post.It was an honest mistake. I'm certain I've made some honest mistakes too. I just remembered thinking 'why would he write Meredith's number in his atlas, when he never called Meredith?' Why would he write her number down before leaving home that day?
The width is definitely a problem.
Would the 10 Franklin show on the bottom sole if it was a wide width?
Have you ever inspected a size 10 Franklin?
Perhaps you can Google the specs, chart it and compare to a name brand we know he wore.
Otto, I truly believe you could be called as an expert in any case.
Thank you for all you do!!
Btw, you are right, the width seems to be the problem as well.
Can't wait to see SG43's demo.
I don't quite understand your question.
So true... and the dt stressed to the jury, over and over, the lack of anything linking jy forensically to the scene. My concern is the the pt didn't stress to the jury, over and over, that we don't always leave dna... An expert could've counteracted the dt's insinuations that his dna had to be there if he did it. It seems like a simple enough concept, that we don't always leave dna behind, but sometimes we assume that what is obvious to us, is obvious to everyone! What the jurors heard, repeatedly, is how do explain the lack of dna? And I'm a little worried it wasn't explained to them in the most logical way... that we just don't always leave our dna behind!!! I'm hoping the jury doesn't get hung up on this!
JMO
I don't quite understand your question.
The shoes mr gracielee tried on were an 8 WIDE in a ladies size. My feet aren't overly wide, I can wear a medium or wide, but when wide is available, expecially in a shoe I would normally wear with socks, for walking distances, I buy the wide for comfort. Now mr gracielee has a narrow foot. Again, not overly narrow, he wouldn't be out hunting around for a narrow shoe. He wears the common size men's medium. I think possibly his feet look more narrow to me because they are so much longer than mine. I tried slipping his birkies on to just run outside to let the dogs in once. They just kept falling off my feet though. Way too big for me.
Maybe a 10W instead of just a 10?