Just the Fax
Justice For The Fisher's
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2007
- Messages
- 4,924
- Reaction score
- 105
What about my question? Are those painted rocks or that fake bark stuff all around the bushes?
Sorry...they are red rocks + red mulch under the shrubs.
What about my question? Are those painted rocks or that fake bark stuff all around the bushes?
I haven't watched the ICA trial much at all, only turned up the sound when I saw G, C, or L testifying. But the few times I was actually listening closely, it appeared Jose Baez had to be instructed numerous times as to how to word a particular question. It reminded me of the defense guy in the BC case. Usually in first degree murder trials, the lawyers are well versed in how to shape their questions to conform with proper procedure, protocol and keep their question from eliciting something like a hear-say response, etc. That's why I made the comment I did about Judge Stephens. He's a no nonsense guy, likes things to run smoothly and is a stickler for procedure. I think we'd have seen a *different side to* judge Stephens, if he had to put up with the constant objections as in the previous trial. JS's is a nice, southern gentleman, but in that same vein, you don't want to rile him. He can open up a whole big can 'o 'whup-' if need be IMO. :rocker:
:woohoo:
:seeya:
![]()
If I were the prosecutor, I would have shown this pic at closing.
How preposterous to think MY would go in his messy office and find those 2 ebay printouts, turned over on top of the printer.
His motive should be perfectly clear. He was anxious for CY to be rescued.... calling MF twice (noon and 1:30) and then having mommy call her as well should stand out as unbelievable.
OK, you are determined to talk about this so here goes. I know JS well. He commands respect as opposed to the judge in that other case. So, no, I think things would have run smoother and a whole lot less bias would have been present in the courtrom. First, I think he would have been extremely fair to both sides, therefore reducing the need to get dramatic. I think he would have put both BZ and HK in their places right from the get go. I think all attornies have to reword their question from time to time. It goes with the territory. I have seen well trained ones have to reword their questions. It does not mean they are not excellent attornies and well versed.
Sorry...they are red rocks + red mulch under the shrubs.
My thoughts exactly when I saw that picture. Why would MY go look through that mess of papers unless SHE had printed something and needed to go that printer to retrieve it.
Much ado about nothing. It was the only excuse he could think of to get MF to the house.
Based on that picture, he could have easily spoofed a call (fax machine in the picture).
I just put the local news on now, forgot to check at 5:00. Did anybody hear the local report on the trial? I was busy opening a bottle of wine. Don't think I can make it through the week-end.![]()
I need a glass of wine.
Or perhaps a bottle...