Where was the razorblade found?
Do we know?
I believe in her jacket pocket. Stryker57 said she used one to clean her ceramic stove/oven.
Where was the razorblade found?
Do we know?
Why commit suicide where you can possibly be seen? Why wouldn't she commit suicide at home or somewhere remote?
"Self-inflicted" cuts is an opinion, not a fact. She had cuts to her fingers and a razor blade in her pocket. If she had a gun shot to her head and a gun in her pocket, no one would assume that the injuries were self-inflicted, and no one should make the same assumption about a razor blade.
"Blood was found inside DeBoer's car and on its exterior. That could have possibly come from self-inflicted cuts on DeBoer's fingers."
Is this the first mention of blood on the exterior of the car or did I just miss it before? New info or media error?
I thought the same thing when I read the same article today. I assumed thus far that the blood was all on the inside of the car. I also would like to know if the cuts/blood were recent or old. I realize that pinpointing to that morning or the day before would be impossible but whether the cuts were older and had healed somewhat versus fresh/open would be good to know.
The network will detach the phone, but when our people look at the tower data they know that is from a loss of signal in the situation you describe.
The people analyzing this stuff are absolutely expert at it - this is not the phone company doing it, I've posted the link to who does it at least during exigent circumstances. Go back and look. The only variable here is were LE speaking precisely and exactly when they said it was "shut off".
But if we are tracking someone who is missing, we are VERY VERY clearly told: signal was lost vs the phone was shut off. And they've NEVER been wrong in all the cases we've worked on. I know two of the people that worked on this at the beginning of the case. Again, I've not asked them anything about it, but this is how things generally go. If the MLT spokesman said the phone was "shut off right after", and if you assume those words mean the phone was turned off by a person, then I do believe the cell forensics support it.
There have been huge advances in this in the last three years, all outside of the realm of the wireless carriers.
I think they were fresh ......rain would have washed off the blood outside the car don't u think?
If we knew Cheryl has mental issues, drug issues, a divorce, a diary with suicidal thoughts, her hubby had a 21 year old girlfriend..something then I would be more inclined to buy into the suicide theory but so far none of that has been the case so I just do not see how LE can say or even hint suicide might be the cause when there is no evidence that leads to that, just the bizarre lack of evidence is all we have plus unknown animal blood...im so puzzled still...
I agree but those examples you listed made me wonder if one of those or something similar could be the "sensitive" item LE alluded to earlier on . I assumed it was the bag but there may be knowledge that they legally cannot release (medical history) or unethical to mention if it involves personal matters . i don't get that impression based on statements by those who are close to the case.
"Blood was found inside DeBoer's car and on its exterior. That could have possibly come from self-inflicted cuts on DeBoer's fingers."
Is this the first mention of blood on the exterior of the car or did I just miss it before? New info or media error?
They certainly can tip the scales one way or the other. An awful lot of work to get her into the culvert with a bag on her head. Why not the bush on the other side of the creek?
Poisonings sure. But asphyxiation and/or drowning - people struggle!
That's the beauty of suicide, there doesn't need to be a motive. People sometimes reach an erroneous conclusion that the world is better off without them. I've seen plenty of those cases, and the families say the same thing as this family "she was fine, happy, everything was ok". We don't know all the dark thoughts people carry with them.
I'll also accept there are murderers who kill without apparent motive or just for gratification, but they are few and far between and again, those scenes are usually showing evidence of homicide.
It is a medical opinion from the person responsible for making those determinations under Washington state law.
I agree but those examples you listed made me wonder if one of those or something similar could be the "sensitive" item LE alluded to earlier on . I assumed it was the bag but there may be knowledge that they legally cannot release (medical history) or unethical to mention if it involves personal matters . i don't get that impression based on statements by those who are close to the case.
Suicide is most easily achieved at home. Why would someone drive 2 miles, then walk another 1.5 miles, to commit suicide in a dark, cold, hip-deep creek culvert?
DeBoer died of asphyxia and freshwater drowning (link). She was found with a plastic bag covering her face/head. Someone else could have caused unconsciousness before she was put into the creek, and there may be no evidence of a struggle.
There is no logical explanation at this time for murder or suicide.
The Medical Examiner is offering an opinion about the cuts to fingers, but if there had not been a razor blade in the pocket, would the opinion be: self-inflicted? If someone is found with a gun shot to the head, can the Medical Examiner conclude who pulled the trigger?
Suicide is most easily achieved at home.
<snipped for emphasis>
1. No (reported) evidence that she struggled to remove the bag over her head - e.g. scratch marks on her neck, bruising - and apparently a clean tox screen so she wasn't unconscious when the bag was put over her head
2. No indication from her clothing that she was assaulted or in a struggle for her life
3. Someone mentioned that she wouldn't have "crawled through brambles" to the location. That seems more likely to me than someone managing to force or drag her through that sort of terrain without leaving obvious signs (again, these may not be reported).
I completely understand that there are things that don't seem to make sense, and that the family feel it was homicide. And I applaud LE for continuing to work the case. I hope they can find something that gives an answer one way or another.
But speaking personally, as someone who has tried to take their own life, I would rather believe that Cheryl made her own choice and was at peace with it than died in terror at anothers hands.
BBM--where did it say they found items belonging to Cheryl. They found "evidence" no one has confirmed exactly what it was (?)Cheryl had cuts to one finger on each hand. Was that evidence of a struggle, or self-inflicted? Although medical examiners are trained to examine cuts for the purpose of identifying a weapon blade, I need more information before I will believe that a medical examiner can look at a cut, and with no additional information, determine that it was self-inflicted. I simply don't believe that is part of anyone's skillset.
Clearly, deeming the cuts "self-inflicted" supports the police theory of suicide.
Given that some of Cheryl's belonging were found upstream from the culvert, if it was suicide it's more likely that she walked along the creek next to the cemetery until she got to the culvert, and discarded some possessions as she approached the culvert.
Suicide is supported by the fact that we've had difficulties understanding how someone could put a body, unseen, at that location. Alternatively, Morgan Harrington was found in a field where it was equally difficult to understand how she got there until there was an arrest and conviction of a former football player who had a reputation for hitting women in the head, picking them up, and carrying them to secluded areas.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.