- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,240
- Reaction score
- 274,126
http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2015/jun/12/naacp-presidents-claims-about-background-disputed/
I am wondering if this is another technically true lie... I mean, about no mother terrorizing her own children. Supposing she manufactured the hate crimes, who's to say it means that she terrorized her own children?
If her kids are in on her racial deception, and I honestly can't see how they could avoid knowing, having known her and lived with her and interacted with her white family before she became black, they might be in on the hate crimes as well. There'd be no reason for them to be particularly scared of the KKK because mom sent herself some scary letters. Heck, one of the kids might have posted them (in some video interview Rachel said something about one letter being put in the mailbox and one being posted from Oakland and the person couldn't be in two places at the same time).
This is not meant to blame the children in anyway, I'm just noticing that the reason she gives is that she must be innocent because she wouldn't terrorize her own kids. But the reasoning presumes that they'd be terrorized, and it's not necessarily true if they know.
True.
However, she DOES terrorize her son. We have seen some of her talks with him about white privilege and white dominance and white's violent repression of the black race....and on and on.....

IMO< she did terrorize her own son.