WA - Civil rights activist Rachel Dolezal pretending to be black, parents say #1

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #981
Kinda OT: I am thinking out loud here. Recently my brother did the DNA ethnicity test offered by Ancestry.com, and share his results with me. We are 35% Irish, 30% Western European, 20% Scandanavian and 15% Iberian Peninsula. I have never "identified" with being mostly Irish and had no clue I was.

So here is my question: Would Irish people be angry with me if I identified with their nationality? And started carrying on as if I were? Like walking in an Irish parade? My last name is not Irish. I have friends who are half Italian and identify with being Italian.

Granted, I am not perpetuating a fraud or any of that, but I was just wondering if you all identify with your ancestral roots? And would you all change your "identity" to be one more than the other?

I am genuinely interested in what you all have to say. I apologize for being OT. TIA

Great question Zuri. Here's how I relate my answer through my own experience of ancestry. When I met my birth father in my late 30s, I found out that my DNA from him was Welsh and Cherokee, not French/Irish/Native American as I had been told as a child. So I am supposedly one quarter Cherokee. Theoretically that would make me eligible for federal benefits. I would never dream of applying for any such money because I don't live as a Cherokee and I would feel guilty taking money I don't deserve except for genetics! I would just know that my selfishness would impact some young Cherokee woman in Oklahoma who (for instance) didn't get some extra money for college and doesn't have the same privileges I had growing up white and middle class. That money would mean way more to her life than it would to mine, I'm sure.

Having said all that though, I've long been interested in Native American cultures, mainly because of the reverence for Mother Earth and the awareness that all beings equally share this planet. Since I was 6 I've been fascinated with the cliff dwelling and pueblo cultures of the Southwest U.S. and have often traveled to that area and visited Native places as a respectful tourist and invited spiritual pilgrim. I've traveled in northern Georgia exploring the Cherokee country [ETA after I learned my true ancestry] and learned about the sophisticated culture that was the Cherokee Nation in the early days of the United States. I've stood in the fields of the last Cherokee capitol where they were rounded up for the march on the Trail of Tears. My tears flowed for the grief and fear of being ripped from their home and the land that they considered their Mother. I've also toured a lovely brick mansion with the rolling fields of a plantation owned by one of the wealthiest Cherokee men in the area at the time, who owned hundreds of slaves. I came face to face with the history of Cherokee living as white people - assimilating to the point of owning other humans - and I felt sick inside.

But I think that anyone with a normal compassionate heart would feel those things, wouldn't they? Do I feel it more strongly because of my Cherokee DNA? I dunno!

As to your question about suddenly identifying yourself as Irish and if that would offend people from Ireland, my experience of traveling on the Emerald Isle says that as long as you are buying the Guinness, no one is going to complain ;) They are a very warm people, generally speaking. They live in a magical place and they love sharing it with visitors. You should go visit sometime. I guarantee you will fall in love with the place. It's impossible not to, IMVHO.

BTW, the Irish culture is very ancient and the ancient Celts were very well traveled. There's a great book called How The Irish Saved Civilization, that I highly recommend.
 
  • #982
I suspect that we are almost done here. What will she do when we dont care any more? Plagiarize more art and try to sell it for thousands of dollars? She is Zelig, as much as I hate bringing Woody Allen into any discussion. IMO it was his most brilliant movie and was a favorite of mine until his actions made me lose my appetite for him.


Completely on same page about Woody Allen- I boycott his movies, old and new.

And about RD....yep, her time is just about over, and I don't give a bleep about what she does next. Best case we read about her being charged for one of the crimes she's committed, but that's not gonna happen.

I think I have a pretty good sense of the what's and why's of her story, and truthfully, IMO the only coverage she ever warranted was local, for being kicked off the Spokane police commission for ethical violations, and for her fraudulent claims of hate crimes.
 
  • #983
Rachel Dolezal said “Exodus: Gods and Kings” should be banned because Moses was played by Christian Bale, a white English actor. Shortly after she resigned as Spokane NAACP president, an interview of the activist criticizing the 2014 biblical drama resurfaced.

“A lot of people might go to that film. Hopefully nobody goes to that film. We need to boycott that film from my perspective because it’s miseducation,” Dolezal told radio host Taylor Weech of “Exodus: Gods and Kings” in an interview in October 2014 in Spokane.

According to Dolezal, a Caucasian woman who pretended to be black for years, having Bale play Moses in “Exodus: Gods and Kings” is misrepresentation, which is greatly offensive not only to the people who actually were living during that time but also to people of the current generation.
http://www.ibtimes.com.au/rachel-do...kings-christian-bale-moses-resurfaces-1452436
 
  • #984
Putting everything together, one possible version of the truth, giving her some benefit of the doubt:

RD had an unusual but happy enough childhood through age 15-16. Her parents adopted 4 black children in 1994-5, when RD was 15-16. Rachel became genuinely fascinated by black culture because of her new siblings, which is why she chose to attend a racial reconciliation degree program in Mississippi.

Her artwork began to reflect her notions of black culture, she bonded with black mentors, she chose a black husband.

She applied to Howard because of her interest in blacks and their culture, but her application already demonstrated her willingness to blur the lines between interest and appropriation. Howard renewed her scholarship and TA position for a second year even after the obvious truth about her race became obvious on day one.

Some professors, including a well known expert on black female artists, didn't welcome her or appreciate a white woman claiming black identification as an artist. RD was angry about how she was treated by those professors, and after graduation, assumed that Howard would hire her because she was RD, even though she never actually applied for a job.

When a black artist was hired, even though it was for an art specialty she didn't have, Rachel sued Howard. She may well have thought the artist was hired because of being black, but she also clearly believed she was entitled to a job there. Lessons learned.

A few years later, RD's marriage came apart. She accused her husband of every kind of abuse, including extreme violence directed at their son. She expected her family to take sides against her husband but they didn't, with the possible exception of Joshua. They didn't because they didn't believe in divorce, and according to her uncle, they didn't because they were concerned about her baby son and didn't want to lose contact with him by burning their bridges with their son in law.

Rachel didn't forgive them for not taking her side.

Within a few years RD decided that the fastest way to be taken seriously and be successful in the black art world and the civil rights community was to declare herself as at least biracial, which she did in Idaho in her civil rights education position. Soon enough she decided just being biracial wasn't getting her enough attention; she was liked, but her career wasn't advancing.

In 2010 she began making false claims of hate crimes, and she decided having a very black son would be beneficial too, especially since she could screw her parents too on that one. Her brother has already asked to be emancipated; alleging that her parents physically abused him was enough to have the court award her guardianship.

The family split as a result. Joshua expressed his anger to her for the harm she was doing to the family.

In 2013 RD's sister came of age and left the group home she had been sent to after a long series of illegal and troubling behavior, topped off by a charge of grand larceny. She asked to stay with RD and RD said yes. Shortly afterwards RD's sister accused Joshua of molesting her years earlier, and it appears RD claimed to be victimized by him as well.

Early in 2014 RD kicked her sister out for lying to her and for contacting their parents "behind her back." Her sister responded by outing RD as a race-faking lying hypocrite, but erased that from her blog sometime afterwards.

Inferences drawn.

Thanks button definitely not enough for this very helpful post. Thank you!!!!

:cheers:
 
  • #985
I think there is a massive difference between Identifying with a part of your history, and fabricating a history of oppression....She didn't just choose to "identify" as black. She chose to create a history of oppression and hardship, that didn't exist. And she got ahead for it.

Seems virtually any Black American or AA can truthfully, accurately say - their ancestors have a history of having been oppressed and subject to hardship by whites.
(Did my 4x-grandfather oppress your 4x-grandfather? Maybe, IDK. What about my 3x great-uncle oppressing your 3x great-uncle? Maybe, IDK. I know I am not oppressing you or visiting hardship on you because of your race, whatever it happens to be.
Seems virtually anyone can truthfully, accurately say - ancestors of Black Americans or AA have a history of having been oppressed and subject to hardship by whites.

Aside from Howard Uni scholarship, civic group, LE oversight board issues, etc. (which are not clear cut, jmo, for lack of info), over ~5? yrs her claims of being hate crime victim are far more disturbing - demanding LE time and tax $ to investigate her frivolous lies.

And that, Ms RD, is the problem I (and some other folks) see w your actions: filing false police reports about events that did not occur and for which you created bogus evidence. That is literally criminal. JM2cts, could be all wrong.
 
  • #986
You need to watch this song for my answer. :)

[video=youtube;TCueMl54FdQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCueMl54FdQ[/video]

This was very cool. Thank you for posting this. I smiled! Irish eyes and all that.

Great question Zuri. Here's how I relate my answer through my own experience of ancestry. When I met my birth father in my late 30s, I found out that my DNA from him was Welsh and Cherokee, not French/Irish/Native American as I had been told as a child. So I am supposedly one quarter Cherokee. Theoretically that would make me eligible for federal benefits. I would never dream of applying for any such money because I don't live as a Cherokee and I would feel guilty taking money I don't deserve except for genetics! I would just know that my selfishness would impact some young Cherokee woman in Oklahoma who (for instance) didn't get some extra money for college and doesn't have the same privileges I had growing up white and middle class. That money would mean way more to her life than it would to mine, I'm sure.

Having said all that though, I've long been interested in Native American cultures, mainly because of the reverence for Mother Earth and the awareness that all beings equally share this planet. Since I was 6 I've been fascinated with the cliff dwelling and pueblo cultures of the Southwest U.S. and have often traveled to that area and visited Native places as a respectful tourist and invited spiritual pilgrim. I've traveled in northern Georgia exploring the Cherokee country [ETA after I learned my true ancestry] and learned about the sophisticated culture that was the Cherokee Nation in the early days of the United States. I've stood in the fields of the last Cherokee capitol where they were rounded up for the march on the Trail of Tears. My tears flowed for the grief and fear of being ripped from their home and the land that they considered their Mother. I've also toured a lovely brick mansion with the rolling fields of a plantation owned by one of the wealthiest Cherokee men in the area at the time, who owned hundreds of slaves. I came face to face with the history of Cherokee living as white people - assimilating to the point of owning other humans - and I felt sick inside.

But I think that anyone with a normal compassionate heart would feel those things, wouldn't they? Do I feel it more strongly because of my Cherokee DNA? I dunno!

As to your question about suddenly identifying yourself as Irish and if that would offend people from Ireland, my experience of traveling on the Emerald Isle says that as long as you are buying the Guinness, no one is going to complain ;) They are a very warm people, generally speaking. They live in a magical place and they love sharing it with visitors. You should go visit sometime. I guarantee you will fall in love with the place. It's impossible not to, IMVHO.

BTW, the Irish culture is very ancient and the ancient Celts were very well traveled. There's a great book called How The Irish Saved Civilization, that I highly recommend.

This was very touching and I appreciate your sharing this. You got where I was going with my thought. I realize fully that what I am talking about is broader scale than what RD has done. She has hurt a lot of people. I was just curious what you all thought about embracing ethnicity and heritage. Thanks so much!
 
  • #987
I think there is a massive difference between Identifying with a part of your history, and fabricating a history of oppression. I can't imagine that an Irish person (I am Irish, but I'm not going to speak for all) would care if someone embraced part of their heritage and found a commonality with that. However if that person fabricated a life that included, let's say, trauma and oppression during the Northern Ireland Conflict. Yeah...I think they would have an issue with that. She didn't just choose to "identify"as black. She chose to create a history of oppression and hardship, that didn't exist. And she got ahead for it.


Oh I agree 100% with your post and I think your example of the Northern Ireland Conflict was a good one. Thanks for responding so eloquently.
 
  • #988
Completely on same page about Woody Allen- I boycott his movies, old and new.

And about RD....yep, her time is just about over, and I don't give a bleep about what she does next. Best case we read about her being charged for one of the crimes she's committed, but that's not gonna happen.

I think I have a pretty good sense of the what's and why's of her story, and truthfully, IMO the only coverage she ever warranted was local, for being kicked off the Spokane police commission for ethical violations, and for her fraudulent claims of hate crimes.

I'm also thinking she'll be moving down the pages quickly, and thank goodness. But I think it WAS important to read and see her info coming out - so that enough people get a decent chance of seeing her for what she is (a liar/poser), and not a good representative of what she was trying to be or do. No, this woman shouldn't be in the media much more with interviews or gasp, reality show stuff. Goodness. I love that saying, "stop making stupid people famous." Yes, for some good she has done for some in her recent works, is now overshadowed by actions she took upon herself. For whatever reasons. Making up victim crimes, etc. isn't a help to the greater good. We're trying to come together as a nation and she's egging it on in one hand and claiming to try to correct it in another. Ppppffffftttttt.

JMO
 
  • #989
http://bossip.com/1155357/racheldol...-white/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter

29C3271200000578-0-image-a-7_1434690913310.jpg

Yeah she's clearly not Ruthanne's biological daughter...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...blended-family-1996-years-deciding-black.html

An Opinion: I like the use of the term "Race Faker". Rachel, and certainly some others, would like the media to adopt "transracial" in relation to her opinion of what it is to be a black woman who is victimized. Rachel is trying to normalize a concept that makes no sense whatsoever. She wants people to believe that there is a black culture in the US that should be recognized as something unique. She is not interested in the Japanese culture, Mexican culture, European Culture, British Culture, and so on - only the black culture, as though it is more unique than all other cultures. It is only the black "culture" that is attacked with her hate mail fraud. Her position supports the idea that she can adopt black culture and claim to be a black victim of hate crime.

Black is not a culture. It is a race. Black people live all over the world, many of them having set sail even a couple of hundred years ago. They didn't all land in the US. If there was a "black culture", then wouldn't all the black people that landed in all parts of the world all still possess that culture? Which culture would that be: Obama black, or Snoop Dogg black?

Black is a race defined by anthropologists through classification of bone structure. Black skin and dark eyes are other characteristics of the black race. Caucasians and Mongoloids have their own classifications and characteristics. One cannot claim to be black after embracing black beliefs, history, art, and political journey.
 
  • #990
Reminds me of when Stev* Martin was in a movie & said, "I was born a poor....."
Lol!

Total misrepresentation---she is a scam artist
 
  • #991
I think this story is still evolving. She was removed from the Ombudsman position as a result of an investigation that began in April. Her claims of eight potentially false hate mail claims were investigated by police. The media followed up on her alleged hate crime complaints and unearthed Pandora's Box. Rachel's complaints exposed her. Her parents merely confirmed what was already suspected.


I suspect that the sibling that is alleging abuse has been heavily coached by Rachel. The brother that she adopted is said to have been brainwashed by Rachel to hate Caucasians. Her son has been taught to perceive that white people are out to get him - with her baboon whip stories and false hate-mail mailings and claims.
 
  • #992
We know from what has been reported, that Dolezal's son (not sure if her actual son or her brother) was in the store and the claimed somebody was yelling at him and his friend. Son claimed that somebody was using racial slurs, scaring son and his friend. As they run away they knocked over and broke wine bottles.
When police viewed security video, they saw that nothing like this happened. In fact, either son or his friend were playing with a ball, jumping, and knocked over and broke wine bottles.
So where did the son get this idea to claim racial slurs scared him, making him to run away and break wine bottles?
I think I have a pretty good idea on that.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/06/16/us/document-rachel-dolezal-cases.html?_r=0
 
  • #993
Rachel is in a heap of trouble with her mail fraud.

She's been stripped of all titles - Professor (she never was a professor), the colour organization (don't know the initials), and the Ombudsman position. Today, she is still smiling. When will that smirk be wiped off her face. She has misinterpreted tolerance for stupidity. When will she realize that she has not fooled anyone.
 
  • #994
BBM
Putting everything together, one possible version of the truth, giving her some benefit of the doubt:

RD had an unusual but happy enough childhood through age 15-16. Her parents adopted 4 black children in 1994-5, when RD was 15-16. Rachel became genuinely fascinated by black culture because of her new siblings, which is why she chose to attend a racial reconciliation degree program in Mississippi.

Her artwork began to reflect her notions of black culture, she bonded with black mentors, she chose a black husband.

She applied to Howard because of her interest in blacks and their culture, but her application already demonstrated her willingness to blur the lines between interest and appropriation. Howard renewed her scholarship and TA position for a second year even after the obvious truth about her race became obvious on day one.

Some professors, including a well known expert on black female artists, didn't welcome her or appreciate a white woman claiming black identification as an artist. RD was angry about how she was treated by those professors, and after graduation, assumed that Howard would hire her because she was RD, even though she never actually applied for a job.

When a black artist was hired, even though it was for an art specialty she didn't have, Rachel sued Howard. She may well have thought the artist was hired because of being black, but she also clearly believed she was entitled to a job there. Lessons learned.

A few years later, RD's marriage came apart. She accused her husband of every kind of abuse, including extreme violence directed at their son. She expected her family to take sides against her husband but they didn't, with the possible exception of Joshua. They didn't because they didn't believe in divorce, and according to her uncle, they didn't because they were concerned about her baby son and didn't want to lose contact with him by burning their bridges with their son in law.

Rachel didn't forgive them for not taking her side.

Within a few years RD decided that the fastest way to be taken seriously and be successful in the black art world and the civil rights community was to declare herself as at least biracial, which she did in Idaho in her civil rights education position. Soon enough she decided just being biracial wasn't getting her enough attention; she was liked, but her career wasn't advancing.

In 2010 she began making false claims of hate crimes, and she decided having a very black son would be beneficial too, especially since she could screw her parents too on that one. Her brother has already asked to be emancipated; alleging that her parents physically abused him was enough to have the court award her guardianship.

The family split as a result. Joshua expressed his anger to her for the harm she was doing to the family.

In 2013 RD's sister came of age and left the group home she had been sent to after a long series of illegal and troubling behavior, topped off by a charge of grand larceny. She asked to stay with RD and RD said yes. Shortly afterwards RD's sister accused Joshua of molesting her years earlier, and it appears RD claimed to be victimized by him as well.

Early in 2014 RD kicked her sister out for lying to her and for contacting their parents "behind her back." Her sister responded by outing RD as a race-faking lying hypocrite, but erased that from her blog sometime afterwards.

Inferences drawn.
Unbelievable and this must happen much more than I imagined.
This is one of those things that the male in our family that puts us on the roller coaster from hell has cited as his hate for this side of his family.
Just like I think would have happened with him, I think regardless Rachel would have had some other falling out with her family because she's always going to be a victim and never seems to take responsibility for her faults. In her eyes they must be so unworthy of her greatness.
I feel so bad for her parents, her son, and her brother that lives with her, among all others she has came across and played her game on.
Shouldn't she be packing her bags by now and moving to an area they hope hasn't heard of her antics by now?
JMO
 
  • #995
We know from what has been reported, that Dolezal's son (not sure if her actual son or her brother) was in the store and the claimed somebody was yelling at him and his friend. Son claimed that somebody was using racial slurs, scaring son and his friend. As they run away they knocked over and broke wine bottles.
When police viewed security video, they saw that nothing like this happened. In fact, either son or his friend were playing with a ball, jumping, and knocked over and broke wine bottles.
So where did the son get this idea to claim racial slurs scared him, making him to run away and break wine bottles?
I think I have a pretty good idea on that.

It sounds like her son has grown up to hold her values: that a little race deception might help him get ahead. She has raised a child to be a liar who manufactures "victimization" to avoid responsibility, however - her brother and son are still young. Hopefully Rachel will be imprisoned for mail fraud, and they can learn from better people.
 
  • #996
Putting everything together, one possible version of the truth, giving her some benefit of the doubt:

RD had an unusual but happy enough childhood through age 15-16. Her parents adopted 4 black children in 1994-5, when RD was 15-16. Rachel became genuinely fascinated by black culture because of her new siblings, which is why she chose to attend a racial reconciliation degree program in Mississippi.

Her artwork began to reflect her notions of black culture, she bonded with black mentors, she chose a black husband.

She applied to Howard because of her interest in blacks and their culture, but her application already demonstrated her willingness to blur the lines between interest and appropriation. Howard renewed her scholarship and TA position for a second year even after the obvious truth about her race became obvious on day one.

Some professors, including a well known expert on black female artists, didn't welcome her or appreciate a white woman claiming black identification as an artist. RD was angry about how she was treated by those professors, and after graduation, assumed that Howard would hire her because she was RD, even though she never actually applied for a job.

When a black artist was hired, even though it was for an art specialty she didn't have, Rachel sued Howard. She may well have thought the artist was hired because of being black, but she also clearly believed she was entitled to a job there. Lessons learned.

A few years later, RD's marriage came apart. She accused her husband of every kind of abuse, including extreme violence directed at their son. She expected her family to take sides against her husband but they didn't, with the possible exception of Joshua. They didn't because they didn't believe in divorce, and according to her uncle, they didn't because they were concerned about her baby son and didn't want to lose contact with him by burning their bridges with their son in law.

Rachel didn't forgive them for not taking her side.

Within a few years RD decided that the fastest way to be taken seriously and be successful in the black art world and the civil rights community was to declare herself as at least biracial, which she did in Idaho in her civil rights education position. Soon enough she decided just being biracial wasn't getting her enough attention; she was liked, but her career wasn't advancing.

In 2010 she began making false claims of hate crimes, and she decided having a very black son would be beneficial too, especially since she could screw her parents too on that one. Her brother has already asked to be emancipated; alleging that her parents physically abused him was enough to have the court award her guardianship.

The family split as a result. Joshua expressed his anger to her for the harm she was doing to the family.

In 2013 RD's sister came of age and left the group home she had been sent to after a long series of illegal and troubling behavior, topped off by a charge of grand larceny. She asked to stay with RD and RD said yes. Shortly afterwards RD's sister accused Joshua of molesting her years earlier, and it appears RD claimed to be victimized by him as well.

Early in 2014 RD kicked her sister out for lying to her and for contacting their parents "behind her back." Her sister responded by outing RD as a race-faking lying hypocrite, but erased that from her blog sometime afterwards.

Inferences drawn.

Was that in her brother's book?
 
  • #997
Eric Deggans, a TV Critic with NPR, did an outstanding segment regarding Dolezal and the appalling interviews being done with her via MSM. He reaches the same conclusions as we have here in terms of what the actual story is and how we should be handling a dialogue about it.

My only significant objection to this piece is the lead in by Robin Young that includes the Shootings at Emanuel Church in Charleston. There is no excuse for that-there is no need to link this fallacy to the unbearable situation in Charleston. Deggans does a beautiful job of completely ignoring the lead in.

LINK HERE

What happened in Charleston makes RD's fraud even more heinous by contrast. Emmanuel AME is a situation she would never ever have been able to identify with. These were black folks who were victimized because they were black folks; RD would only ever have been in that mix as a faker. She has no insight into what it might mean to be victimized as a black person, because she has never lived it, could never live it as a pretender, and only inserted herself into it because of opportunism.

i don't believe I'm stating this very well, but RD's crimes/lies/pretenses make me even angrier than they did earlier in the week. While she continues to lie, excuse herself, protest that she is persona non grata in Spokane, and maintain her pretense, the friends and family of the Charleston victims are talking about forgiveness of a murderer.
 
  • #998
Kinda OT: I am thinking out loud here. Recently my brother did the DNA ethnicity test offered by Ancestry.com, and share his results with me. We are 35% Irish, 30% Western European, 20% Scandanavian and 15% Iberian Peninsula. I have never "identified" with being mostly Irish and had no clue I was.

So here is my question: Would Irish people be angry with me if I identified with their nationality? And started carrying on as if I were? Like walking in an Irish parade? My last name is not Irish. I have friends who are half Italian and identify with being Italian.

Granted, I am not perpetuating a fraud or any of that, but I was just wondering if you all identify with your ancestral roots? And would you all change your "identity" to be one more than the other?

I am genuinely interested in what you all have to say. I apologize for being OT. TIA

I really want to get that done! So cool. I do identify with my ancestral roots but mostly because I'm second generation American and have been raised with the cultures of my parents. I suppose that would be the case if I were Amish, creole, African American or of another culture originating in America, as well.
 
  • #999
What happened in Charleston makes RD's fraud even more heinous by contrast. Emmanuel AME is a situation she would never ever have been able to identify with. These were black folks who were victimized because they were black folks; RD would only ever have been in that mix as a faker. She has no insight into what it might mean to be victimized as a black person, because she has never lived it, could never live it as a pretender, and only inserted herself into it because of opportunism.

i don't believe I'm stating this very well, but RD's crimes/lies/pretenses make me even angrier than they did earlier in the week. While she continues to lie, excuse herself, protest that she is persona non grata in Spokane, and maintain her pretense, the friends and family of the Charleston victims are talking about forgiveness of a murderer.

Is there any chance that the young man with the gun is a schizophrenic, or brainwashed? Obviously it's not normal for a 21 year old to walk into a church and shoot everyone in sight. What exactly went wrong with this young man's thinking that he did this?
 
  • #1,000
Rachel’s past:


Rachel chose to be home schooled (was a happy child, parents known, accepted, liked)

www.thewesternnews.com ( Local family caught in spotlight)



Rachel Dolezal started her education in the public school system, but chose to be home-schooled.

“Her elementary teachers would say she was a peer mentor,” her mother said. “It was Rachel’s choice to be home-schooled. She wanted to be independent from the peer pressure that she was facing,” her mother explained.

Being home-schooled allowed Rachel the ability to focus on her passion.

“She was and still is a very brilliant artist. She was able to pursue that on her own schedule,” Ruthanne Dolezal said. “If she wanted to spend three days working on a collage she could do that. She couldn’t do that in a public school. One of her public school teachers said she would not have been able to accomplish what she did with her art in the public school setting.”

-------------------------------------

Her uncle Dan came out as gay; her parents supported him and are in close/constant contact with him. Uncle Dan says Rachel wanted everyone in the family to choose sides during her divorce, and was angry when that didn’t happen.


www.ibtimes.com/rachel-dolezals-parents-gave-her-strict-caring–childhood-small-white-town-family-1971916


This makes me feel they are not a strictly Christian fundamentalist family.

Putting everything together, one possible version of the truth, giving her some benefit of the doubt:

RD had an unusual but happy enough childhood through age 15-16. Her parents adopted 4 black children in 1994-5, when RD was 15-16. Rachel became genuinely fascinated by black culture because of her new siblings, which is why she chose to attend a racial reconciliation degree program in Mississippi.

Her artwork began to reflect her notions of black culture, she bonded with black mentors, she chose a black husband.

She applied to Howard because of her interest in blacks and their culture, but her application already demonstrated her willingness to blur the lines between interest and appropriation. Howard renewed her scholarship and TA position for a second year even after the obvious truth about her race became obvious on day one.

Some professors, including a well known expert on black female artists, didn't welcome her or appreciate a white woman claiming black identification as an artist. RD was angry about how she was treated by those professors, and after graduation, assumed that Howard would hire her because she was RD, even though she never actually applied for a job.

When a black artist was hired, even though it was for an art specialty she didn't have, Rachel sued Howard. She may well have thought the artist was hired because of being black, but she also clearly believed she was entitled to a job there. Lessons learned.

A few years later, RD's marriage came apart. She accused her husband of every kind of abuse, including extreme violence directed at their son. She expected her family to take sides against her husband but they didn't, with the possible exception of Joshua. They didn't because they didn't believe in divorce, and according to her uncle, they didn't because they were concerned about her baby son and didn't want to lose contact with him by burning their bridges with their son in law.

Rachel didn't forgive them for not taking her side.

Within a few years RD decided that the fastest way to be taken seriously and be successful in the black art world and the civil rights community was to declare herself as at least biracial, which she did in Idaho in her civil rights education position. Soon enough she decided just being biracial wasn't getting her enough attention; she was liked, but her career wasn't advancing.

In 2010 she began making false claims of hate crimes, and she decided having a very black son would be beneficial too, especially since she could screw her parents too on that one. Her brother has already asked to be emancipated; alleging that her parents physically abused him was enough to have the court award her guardianship.

The family split as a result. Joshua expressed his anger to her for the harm she was doing to the family.

In 2013 RD's sister came of age and left the group home she had been sent to after a long series of illegal and troubling behavior, topped off by a charge of grand larceny. She asked to stay with RD and RD said yes. Shortly afterwards RD's sister accused Joshua of molesting her years earlier, and it appears RD claimed to be victimized by him as well.

Early in 2014 RD kicked her sister out for lying to her and for contacting their parents "behind her back." Her sister responded by outing RD as a race-faking lying hypocrite, but erased that from her blog sometime afterwards.

Inferences drawn.

Great review of the case.

Great question Zuri. Here's how I relate my answer through my own experience of ancestry. When I met my birth father in my late 30s, I found out that my DNA from him was Welsh and Cherokee, not French/Irish/Native American as I had been told as a child. So I am supposedly one quarter Cherokee. Theoretically that would make me eligible for federal benefits. I would never dream of applying for any such money because I don't live as a Cherokee and I would feel guilty taking money I don't deserve except for genetics! I would just know that my selfishness would impact some young Cherokee woman in Oklahoma who (for instance) didn't get some extra money for college and doesn't have the same privileges I had growing up white and middle class. That money would mean way more to her life than it would to mine, I'm sure.

Having said all that though, I've long been interested in Native American cultures, mainly because of the reverence for Mother Earth and the awareness that all beings equally share this planet. Since I was 6 I've been fascinated with the cliff dwelling and pueblo cultures of the Southwest U.S. and have often traveled to that area and visited Native places as a respectful tourist and invited spiritual pilgrim. I've traveled in northern Georgia exploring the Cherokee country [ETA after I learned my true ancestry] and learned about the sophisticated culture that was the Cherokee Nation in the early days of the United States. I've stood in the fields of the last Cherokee capitol where they were rounded up for the march on the Trail of Tears. My tears flowed for the grief and fear of being ripped from their home and the land that they considered their Mother. I've also toured a lovely brick mansion with the rolling fields of a plantation owned by one of the wealthiest Cherokee men in the area at the time, who owned hundreds of slaves. I came face to face with the history of Cherokee living as white people - assimilating to the point of owning other humans - and I felt sick inside.

But I think that anyone with a normal compassionate heart would feel those things, wouldn't they? Do I feel it more strongly because of my Cherokee DNA? I dunno!

As to your question about suddenly identifying yourself as Irish and if that would offend people from Ireland, my experience of traveling on the Emerald Isle says that as long as you are buying the Guinness, no one is going to complain ;) They are a very warm people, generally speaking. They live in a magical place and they love sharing it with visitors. You should go visit sometime. I guarantee you will fall in love with the place. It's impossible not to, IMVHO.

BTW, the Irish culture is very ancient and the ancient Celts were very well traveled. There's a great book called How The Irish Saved Civilization, that I highly recommend.

You make me think of two cases of family members who identified with a culture not heir own, since early childhood, that in adulthood, through ancestry searches, they actually found they were a part of!

My mom was one. All her life she felt a strong affinity for Spain and all things Spanish. She studied flamenco and moved to Spain where she met my dad. Years later her parents did their geneology and found they had Spanish roots via family on my grnadmother's side who emigrated to Holland centuries before!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
123
Guests online
2,656
Total visitors
2,779

Forum statistics

Threads
632,815
Messages
18,632,078
Members
243,303
Latest member
Corgimomma
Back
Top