WA WA - Sky Metalwala, 2, Bellevue, 6 Nov 2011 - # 7

[Chris_Texas]

I think someone that had seen her profile on the site outed her..
or the owner maybe.
Thank you whoever you are for doing the right thing!
Hopefully you will start a new trend Talk away don't WALK away!

eta:Sugar baby sounds like she was gonna rent out the daughter! I'm sure thta was mot the case!
JB is in no way a "baby"!

Sugar Baby is one of the three options you can select. You are either buying or selling, a sugar baby is selling.

 

[ClassyT]

She's not "crazy." She's not "quirky." She's not a "psycho." She's seriously mentally ill.

Her conditions are of her own control. They undoubtedly exist. But, they are like diabetes. Regular maintenance manages it. I have what she has and live a normal productive life. Shes chooses to not treat herself. Her children should have not been with her in the first place. Her condition is no excuse for her actions. How many people in the US live with the condition? We havent killed anyone. Too much time is spent on discussing her "serious illness". She was evaluated several times. She was found fit. She is a spiteful nasty woman. There is no DX for that. I am harder on a person with mental differences because its not a crutch. I am not PC about it. I dont want to say "bless her heart..." Shes needs to either take her meds. Its a choice. I will just cut the politically correct obigatory sympathy. I've got none.

 

[~n/t~]

Ok, how about a juicer used only for staging and a prostitution site where she is openly selling her wares while she has preschool children in-house?

There is no proof whatsoever of what you're alleging. Unless I hear it from LE, I will dismiss it as mud throwing and totally unfounded.

I'm not defending what she did by leaving Sky alone in the car but c'mon. Let's not invent stuff just to make her look worst than she already does.

I bet there are hundreds of single women with children frequenting dating sites. There is nothing wrong with that.

 

[Patty G]

I think the pictures with all the fruit with Little M sitting on the counter is not the apartment they were all living in. Perhaps this is the home of a relative or a "friend". The picture of the children playing in the room with little M in her undies and Sky in his diaper are at the apartment they are living at. IMO FWIW

 

[OneLove]

The kids definitely look like they eat -- I agree that they do not look malnourished; I'm sure she (and SM) fed them..

It's possible that nearby family members of Julia's saw to it that the kids were fed in the way that Soloman had. Even church members, daycare workers, and therapists might have helped make arrangements if they felt the kids needed it.

 

[ClassyT]

I dont really understand what i missed today. Fruit and prostitution? Was it a slow day with information?

 

[cocomod]

I honestly don't see anything wrong in the pictures. They look like normal, healthy, happy kids. They don't look like starving abused kids to me.

I think that the children look healthy; but are they mentally healthy? I am one that thinks that Mommy here has done a number on these kids mentally - especially M. M mimmicks mommy. M is controlled by Mommy during the "exchange". I do not think that she has earned Mommy of the year award. IMHO, I think that she is self-centered and controlling. And, in most pictures, Sky is not smiling or focused on. At that age, kids are usually very photogenic and smiling - IMO

I think she does -



ETA: - my computer is unhappy and won't let me quote any url's right now - but it's the link to her site is above

Sorry, I must have missed it! Thanks!!

 

[Chris_Texas]

Notice on the "dating" website that she does not mention the kids. I wonder if she left the kids alone while she went to "meet" her sugar-daddy.

Actually she does mention her two kids there. However, a sugar daddy doesn't care how many kids she has so long as they are not in his way.

An infant could absolutely be in the way.

 

[Rougelatete]

The juicer looks like it's new and imo, it became the highlight of the day with the children.....M wanting to try the juicer. I use to make popsicles with the kids when they were young from freshly squeezed juice.

I think like in the Baby Lisa case, perhaps some are looking at every little detail and turn into something nefarious.

I need something more than a juicer and a dating site to prove she harmed her baby boy.

I'll be the first to admit that almost everything I write on here is pure speculation....but it's also educated guesses based on the populations I've worked with....people diagnosed with PD's, those in the criminal justice system, and those with severe trauma histories (which I'm not discounting at all with JB -- it would actually explain a lot, so I'm incredibly curious to know what her earlier life was like).

But, I think any juicer put in the hands of someone with OCD as severe as JB's reportedly was....who's OCD symptoms include obsessive cleaning....I think a juicer could look as clean and brand spankin' new on Day 365 as it did on Day 1.

I still think those photos look staged. It's the ratio of food photos to non-food photos that troubles me most. I suspect that if CPS had docked her for not playing enough with the kids, there would be surplus of photos of her busting out blocks and games with the kids. Of course, I could be wrong, but I'm still leaning in that direction.

Also, there are plenty of dating sites where your number one requirement is not meeting someone who had gobs of money that they will give you some portion of. That's not dating. That's a job.

 

[SmoothOperator]

Re: the Metalwala children being starved, malnourished, or any other appearance related major signs of abuse, specifically neglect.

There are several details that IMO need to be pointed out regarding there being a lack of photos showing any of these ^above^ named signs of neglect. First, I don't believe that it has ever been stated in this case by anyone that these children were ever of the appearance of malnourished, starved, etc.. Especially by SM this has never been claimed.. Much different is that SM states that there were infact long periods of time(as in months) that Julia due to illness or just because of being a crappy parent did
Not, could not, would not provide food for these children. This is especially explained in thorough detail with MM specifically before Sky was even born. This woman's illness would not allow there to be food in The home..

Therefor had it not been for the father the children would have been quite possibly starved.. Who knows? I'm just thankful SM didn't allow it to go on and have to find out if Julia would have let them starve to death. Instead SM intervened and moved heaven and earth altering the schedule of their family's only income in order to ensure that MM WAS NOT MALNOURISHED OR STARVED! So therefor IMO you're certainly not going to fond evidence of malnourished starved kids in the photostream.

Re: staging photos.

While I certainly don't believe that all the photos were strategically staged individually(could be wrong).. But rather I feel that much more likely this obsessive mother felt an obsessive motivation compelling her to have documented that which would absolutely and completely negate any/all of SM's documented claims of her severe illnesses and what those illness caused in terms of not being able to provide necessities for her children.. I think it's just another layer of the obsessive compulsion to prove Solomon's claims are not true.. That's exactly what i see with the photostream.
This too further explaining these children will never look or appear under fed.. Due this bej g a claim of SM against Julia she was IMO obsessed with documenting evidence indicating the exact obvious.. As in the over abundance of food we see throughout much of the photostream.

Re: the arrangement "dating" site. While I would personally have zero issue whatsoever of a single woman being on a dating site, I do not consider this a dating site and IMO with Julia having specifically joined this type of site IMO just lends further credence that just as SM refers to in court docs Julia is very much motivated by money and having money.. I believe that this obsessive need of Julias be monetarily cared for will infact become an even larger piece to this puzzle than what we have yet to see.. I think we've barely scratched the surface here..

All in all I am still standing by my originally assessment of this individual.. I believe her to very much have marked mental illness but totally seperate from that I believe Julia to be an extremely manipulative and quite possibly be inherently evil at her most basic core. Shades of Casey indeed tho different in many ways, I still say these two woman's deepest core of their very beings is extremely similar and self consumed.

 

[carole]

Are you certain...? I was thinking the countertop, etc., match her apartment.

Julia's kitchen is much smaller. Julia's kitchen --

IMG_1807 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

IMG_1806 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

 

[OneLove]

There is no proof whatsoever of what you're alleging. Unless I hear it from LE, I will dismiss it as mud throwing and totally unfounded.

I'm not defending what she did by leaving Sky alone in the car but c'mon. Let's not invent stuff just to make her look worst than she already does.

I bet there are hundreds of single women with children frequenting dating sites. There is nothing wrong with that.

Dating is one thing. Offering your services for a price is another. She was quite specific.

Here at Websleuths, we engage constantly in discussing possibilities that LE have yet to confirm.

 

[~n/t~]

ok I googled

Seeking Arrangement Reviews

SeekingArrangement.com see themselves as an 'arrangement' website. This is a growing sub-category in wealthy dating. Their welcome page serves as a quasi-advertisement, geared at getting you to try the site with some attention grabbers. "Join free" is the most prominent texted graphic on the page. A Statement of "Mutually Beneficial Relationships" and other self promotion is anchored by photo images of a Sugar Daddy and a Sugar Baby with some accompanying inviting commentary.

Our first impressions were mixed. We see a site promoting the latest style of relationship. The 'arrangement'. But they are using an old style conventional dating site appearance and approach. The leaders in this niche utilize a very contemporary "look" and feel in their site; that approach is missing at Seeking Arrangement. It feels akin to being seated in a Ferrari vs. Mercedes Benz; we have different expectations.


more at the link

http://wealthy-dating-websites.no1reviews.com/SeekingArrangement.html

 

[Patty G]

Julia's kitchen is much smaller. Julia's kitchen --

IMG_1807 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

IMG_1806 | Flickr - Photo Sharing!

And there is even fruit in the bowl on the counter.

 

[carole]

Actually she does mention her two kids there. However, a sugar daddy doesn't care how many kids she has so long as they are not in his way.

An infant could absolutely be in the way.

BBM

Sky is hardly an infant.

 

[Irish_Eyes]

All caught up now. My turn to use it....whiskey tango foxtrot, Batman! That dating thing put me over the edge. Not because of dating, but because she expects to get 3K min for her trouble. Also the whole whatever arrangement YOU want...how exactly does that jive with being a single mom?

 

[~n/t~]

lol...the owner of the site even wrote a book. Someone actually purchased it and gave a bad review. :innocent:

Amazon.com: Gregory's review of Seeking Arrangement: The Definitive Guide ...

 

[cocomod]

A dating website is different to me then a website where a woman actually openly admits that she is looking for a sugar daddy and is offering him "benefits" for that priviledge. Sorry, I may be old-fashioned, but she is actually saying she wants money from a rich man. She is not a rich woman, so this is not an equal relationship. JMHO

 

[Patty G]

Solomon's attorney states: We understand that during the mediation, almost 12 hours; the children were home without supervision.

Nancy is covering Sky's story.

 

[OneLove]

Is it known how many "hits" this sex for money website gets in a days time?

Because there could be many sleazy people keeping an eye on it and one thing they know for sure is that this "mom" is willing to "do things" for money. Pedophiles would spot her as an easy mark for her children.