No, when I look more, there seems to be green outer shutters, and glass and white inner shutters, so that is TWO sets---the "third" looks like a reflection in the glass....
OK, I DO see that now, yes. In the big picture....it has a solid white wood with design, plus there are the glass and white, plus the green = 3 sets of shutters, oy vey.....Yeah, but not if you look at the bigger picture I put in there. I see the reflection you mention, but look more left in the smaller picture. It's a totally different design the inner panel. See where the glass is broken, there is a reflection of the green shutter, but then the glass is missing and if you look behind the glass, you see a white panel with a very different design on it. It seems to be attached to the wall of the window. I was thinking before that it could have been the door of that cabinet next to the window, but looking at the larger photo, you still see an inner panel on the right side.
![]()
Some clear pictures here:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/RonHendry------2.html
I get what you are seeing. One theory is that they were not completely shut but partially open, the rock made impact which is supposedly visible in one picture and that the impact site on the so called inner shutters has crushed glass in it. The impact caused the shutter to fly open and allow the glass to spray inwards into the room as is illustrated in the photo of the blue throw rug - the inward spray went that far - it was a pretty darn big rock.
Also noted is that had it been thrown from inside, there would have been some type of impact site on the outer dark green shutters which seems to be lacking and in addition, this theory fails to explain how the trajectory from and object travelling from inside to out causes a spray of glass that looks to be consistent with an outside/in trajectory. I have no idea if I spelled that right![]()
I do not in this one, but see my other post, I DO see it in the other one---3 sets. One with glass and white, one with white etching, and one with green louvres.I find it completely strange that you cannot see that inner panel in this photograph.
Some clear pictures here:
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/RonHendry------2.html
I get what you are seeing. One theory is that they were not completely shut but partially open, the rock made impact which is supposedly visible in one picture and that the impact site on the so called inner shutters has crushed glass in it. The impact caused the shutter to fly open and allow the glass to spray inwards into the room as is illustrated in the photo of the blue throw rug - the inward spray went that far - it was a pretty darn big rock.
Also noted is that had it been thrown from inside, there would have been some type of impact site on the outer dark green shutters which seems to be lacking and in addition, this theory fails to explain how the trajectory from and object travelling from inside to out causes a spray of glass that looks to be consistent with an outside/in trajectory. I have no idea if I spelled that right![]()
:spinner: Note if the window was opened (to the inside) the rock could have been thrown from the inside. There is a sort of impact site on the 'white' inner shutters. Hard to figure out anything from the 'glass trajectory' in the room IMO.
It is my belief that a rock was found, the inner shutters and glass window were opened, green outer shutters closed, and the rock thrown against the window from the inside.
Is that where the boots were prior to being 'ransacked'? Is that how she left her room? This is where the 'supposed' truth finding really comes in to play.
That could be - I get your description and seeing that possibility. So you are saying that they closed the outer green shutters, opened the window first as though someone came in through it, and then tossed the rock at the window.
The devil's advocate on that one says - a rock thrown at such a very short distance from inside the room may have not been thrown hard enough to cause that sort of impact damage.
I mean, you look at the rock and the glass and you can determine it would not have to be thrown very hard to break the glass at close range. I'm just thinking from the "staging" mind. I don't think they would hurl it.
Is that where the boots were prior to being 'ransacked'? Is that how she left her room? This is where the 'supposed' truth finding really comes in to play.
That could be - I get your description and seeing that possibility. So you are saying that they closed the outer green shutters, opened the window first as though someone came in through it, and then tossed the rock at the window.
The devil's advocate on that one says - a rock thrown at such a very short distance from inside the room may have not been thrown hard enough to cause that sort of impact damage.
I mean, you look at the rock and the glass and you can determine it would not have to be thrown very hard to break the glass at close range. I'm just thinking from the "staging" mind. I don't think they would hurl it.
I suppose. The slippers look most natural to me in the way they are left - have you had a pre-teen or teen girl and been in their room?
Boots bring up a memory of that show where the ex-criminal burglers breached peoples' homes to show them how easy it would be to steal everything in minutes. They ALWAYS went for the boots...they said women always try to hide money and other valuable things like weapons in boots. This would be something a thief would know or think of...so maybe the boots were targeted, don't know. Do you have any information on that that you feel is relevant?
Alright, making progress then. :rocker:
Have you seen the rock and noted the weight/size? Kind of big rock.
They didn't have to hurl it, it could have been held, wrapped in something, tossed, etc.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.