I've been thinking about this as I ran a few errands this afternoon. This is just speculation on my part, but consider this scenario...........
On March 29th, Sarah made the call to a help line, giving her name - Sarah Barlow - and stating that she had been abused. She gave details of her sexual and physical abuse, and said she was 16 and had a 10-month-old daughter and was a few weeks pregnant.
On March 30th, Sarah made a second call and back-tracked, saying she had made a mistake and that she was happy. She wanted her first call disregarded.
On April 3rd, the sheriff enters the YFZ ranch to investigate, and on April 4th, Child Protective Services begins removing children from the ranch.
In this scenario, Sarah makes the call on March 29th, but is caught - perhaps by a sister-wife, who reports to her husband. Sarah is confronted and told she is to make a second call and retract what she told the authorities.
Sarah makes the call on March 30th and after the call is made, Sarah is taken away from the YFZ ranch to another location. I suspect she was taken by the women who later claimed they were "out of town" when the ranch was raided and their children taken.
If Sarah and the women left the next day, March 31st, and the women didn't get back until sometime after CPS began removing children on April 4th................... they traveled a long distance.
We don't know when the women returned, but at the minimum, they were gone 5 - 6 days. That would make their destination 2 to 3 days from El Dorado, Texas.
The FLDS may have acted to remove Sarah from the YFZ ranch under the belief that if authorities investigated, they would be looking for Sarah. They had no idea of what was about to unfold! None of them dreamed the authorities would remove ALL the children.
History tells us that sometimes women escape from the FLDS, but they sometimes don't get their children out. In this case, it's doubtful that Sarah's 10-month-old daughter went with her. Sarah's baby may be among the children that were removed.
Weeks down the road, when most all of the children have been identified, CPS may have one 10-month-old girl that remains unidentified. If the baby can somehow be identified as Sarah Barlows, the FLDS can't claim that Sarah Barlow doesn't exist.