weekend discussion: discuss the trial here #139

Status
Not open for further replies.
Respectfully snipped

:therethere: For your finger. :hug:

6a00d83451d02f69e2010535e4d998970b-320wi

:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
Bubbai ALV ty for coming! BTW, someone let this expert know that there is $$$ to be made in being a text msg interpreter .... SURE! .... at least $300/HR!

Maybe Ive lived on this rock out in the middle of a huge pond too long, but I have never heard of AVL. What did I learn from her .... she makes herself out to be more important than she actually is, she certainly has a very high opinion of herself.

ALV was clearly biased in her effort to defend the murderer actions, before, during and after the murder. Her attack on Mr. Travis Alexander was disgusting and truly just wrong .... I think she was sucked in by this murderer and was just plain greedy. Her arrogance in asking Mr. Martinez if he wanted yes or no or the truth? JMHO, ALV would not know the truth if it was tatooed on her forehead.

Im glad Mr. Martinez exposed this so-called expert for what she really is .... a fraud! All JMHO!

Mahalo to David Lohr for posting the interrogation tapes...

Mahalo Tigerbalm for posting the links to the daily trials...
 
- brings her own cheerleaders.

unable to recall anything without paper, unless it benefits the DT
uses a self created ever-evolving continuum, rather than present hard facts and data to support claims
uses sayings and random thoughts to support claims ie. 90% of communication is non-verbal, again rather than present hard facts and data to support claims, Notice she did not use 'Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned', an age-old saying in the real world.
writes no report on the case or her findings, analysis, or data, nor does she sign anything.
no proof she did anything but read other reports, 1000 of other pages of texts, gmails, etc other than her word.
unable to recall items in the aforementioned with certainty.
submits an incomplete, biased assessment
falsifies, overstates prior achievements and activities on cv

ok, next?
 
Brought over from the Other Thread



Hey now...I'm over 50 and my Mom is 75 and we both wear funky things. And 70 is the NEW 55
:rocker:

Me too but the juror is not 70 he is reportedly only in his 30s which make more sense with the Affliction tee.
 
Who is that annoying blonde talking head on HLN?

She's chastising the jury for being "flippant" and "disrespectful" to Travis and Travis' family when they ask questions like, "Well, you didn't talk to Travis, did you?" That isn't even close to the way in which questions were asked. She's a big pot stirrer.

The actual questions were emphasizing the fact that Travis couldn't tell his side of the story and that DV Lady didn't speak with anyone except Jodi. I think they're making a point to her and to the Family of "We're not buying your snake oil and we don't believe Travis was what you've made him in your mind."

Sometimes I really want to smack the talking heads. :furious:

Then, she started to say something snarky about Juan, but she caught herself and finished her sentence by saying "but most of our viewers think he hung the moon"......and we do!
 
Then, she started to say something snarky about Juan, but she caught herself and finished her sentence by saying "but most of our viewers think he hung the moon"......and we do!

You mean he didn't?? :floorlaugh:
 
- Gives shout outs to her buddies in court

- Makes smarty pants, patronizing comments to the prosecutor ("Are you angry with me, Mr. Martinez?) and admonishes the prosecutor ("If you were in my group, Mr. Martinez, I'd put you in a Time-Out.

- Stalling, stalling, stalling by pretending she doesn't understand the prosecutor's questions and insisting on providing folksy and annoying anecdotal details then suddenly capable of giving succinct and even monosyllabic answers to the defense attorney.

She was really convinced she was going to ride in and save the day for the defense team but ended up limping off the stand and needing assistance herself.

BBM my favorite example of this today was when Juan asked, "You started answering questions this morning at about 9:30, right?" And aVL answered, "mr. Martinez, I am not understanding what you are getting at." Or something like that. Crazy.
 
*snort last date I was on was in 2011

Sent from my SGH-T989 using Tapatalk 2

Ive been in many "relationships", been married, and most recently escaped from an abusive 2 year mistake...but I honestly dont remember ever being on a 'real date'--you know, where a guy actually asks you out, plans a date, picks you up, takes you out, walks you to the door...
It must be my generation (Im 42); friends my age agree...real "old fashioned" dating seems to have skipped us :(
Sorry for OT... chivalry is dead.
 
Then, she started to say something snarky about Juan, but she caught herself and finished her sentence by saying "but most of our viewers think he hung the moon"......and we do!

I don't think he hung the moon... it had to be created first :fence:
 
I KNOW. That was so annoying when she tried to say that Juan would be disrespectful and hurtful towards Travis and his family. SERIOUSLY?

That is the opposite of Juan's position. He is often seen at their side, before, during and after court. He is here FOR Travis and to preserve his reputation.

This Holly Hughes lady has no clue what Travis's family feel about Juan. He is their hero and protector, imo.


Especially after today, its seems pretty obvious that the DT and JA have lost, and the worst has yet to come (JM's rebuttal and closing). So, the pundits are left sounding more and more idiotic and distasteful with each of the remaining few days of trial.

HLN is particularly disgusting.. has turned this trial into a catheter commercial with a few minutes for trial breaks here and there... ugh.
 
Just wanted to remind all -- If you have a DATE this weekend. Make sure you say PLEASE to your Other.
Caution-02-june.gif
You do not want to be considered an Abuser!!
 
Did ALV even talk to JA about the murder? Too old-fashioned for that maybe? Wouldn't want to hurt her feelings?

I wonder about that...

I also wonder if she has seen the autopsy photos and the murder scene photos? Not that I think looking at such photos would change her mind about anything she believes. She is one stone cold creature. :twocents:
 
Could Ms. Wong be called to the stand to verify that she was the person who received the tape with Travis shooting the gun? I'm not concerned whatsoever about her having an attorney, all networks have their own lawyers.

No, she was going to be called after Jean C. regarding the defense's motion for prosecutorial misconduct, regarding the fans of Juan, photos and cane signing.
 
Near the end of Alyce's testimony today she said that she believed she got the "Jodi shooting in the closet" info from Dr Samuels...is this a no-no? Is she allowed to be privy to someone else's testimony, and then use is as her own while she's on the stand?

I don't think she referred to his testimony. She was giving the reports from the other expert witnesses. But she seemed to be trying to throw them under he bus.
 
If I just did the dishes after my SO said 'are you going to do something or what' am I abused after sitting on the couch for 4 hours straight or does he have a point?

ALV: Abused.

GENPOP: Get off your lazy 🤬🤬**!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
297
Guests online
854
Total visitors
1,151

Forum statistics

Threads
625,910
Messages
18,513,676
Members
240,882
Latest member
neurotic_cat
Back
Top