Ammonitida
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2013
- Messages
- 1,281
- Reaction score
- 0
IMO this May 22nd journal entry was concocted after the killing. It makes sense to me that from May 22 on the journal entries were fabricated post killing. Just speculation and sadly there is no way for JM to prove it. I wonderif he is allowed to mention that there is the possibility that these entries were made after the killing and pre-dated?
Juan knows they're fabricated because her May 26nd and onward entries have her not planning to go to Mesa and that's not what the state believes, but due to the closeness in time (you couldn't date it forensically under these circumstances), it's impossible to prove.
I do believe the phone was lost and she was afraid of it being recovered by someone else and allowing this suspicious recorded call to fall in the hands of law enforcement. It could show malice and therefore cast more suspicion upon her. So she tried to cover it up with that May 22nd entry, just like she did with the "traded passwords" lie (also suspiciously covered in that May 22nd entry), which as DeMarte pointed out was contradicted by a text message in May where Travis accused her of unauthorized access to his Facebook account. The 2008 journal is largely a fabrication, intended to coverup every possible motive.
You must remember the lengths this woman went through to cover up her involvement in the the murder.
We have fake emails, fake back-dated checks, fake text messages, fake voice mails, several fake memorials (one of which came from her youtube account that was created a day after the stolen gun), and indisputable fake journal entries from June 10th and onward where she feigned ignorance of Travis's death.