I finished the book yesterday. I’m a fast reader and tend to have a nonfiction and fiction book going at the same time. I really “enjoyed” this one. Feels weird to say I liked it when the event was just so horrendous and learning about the backgrounds of the girls made me so sad.
Melinda really didn’t have much of a chance given the level of abuse in her household and a mother who ignored it. I know that many people have survived this (and worse) and have not gone on to torture and murder an innocent girl. But imho, it explains a lot. It really was a failure of Child Protective Services, too. I believe they were called to Melinda’s home and never followed up.
Laurie’s background is awful, too, and it seems that she needed attention from a healthy adult who could have recognized that she has some serious psychological issues. It sounds like Laurie was close to her grandma and when she passed, Laurie’s life really took a dark turn.
I have one critique about the format, but it’s probably just personal preference. Chapters are dedicated to each girl and their respective stories are told so we go through basically the same information on the torture and murder over and over. I would like to ask the author why she did it this way and I’m sure she has good reasons. It was hard for me to tell the nuances in the stories and (admittedly) I found it difficult to keep hearing the same thing. I think a timeline of what we know happened may have been enough. It seemed to me that each girl was telling the story to minimize their own responsibility and I’m not sure we really know what actually happened or who did what that night. Again, I really liked the book and it’s a story that needs to be told.
I appreciated the Epilogue and how the author highlights how the community was questioning how this happened and what they may have learned from this. The school system, the child welfare system, parents, friends and neighbors all failed Shanda.