Also, I am in tears- if this is true, its beyond great. KC can explain away everything, but if her prints/DNA are on that tape- that is DIRECT evidence that puts her at the crime scene.
There is no way to explain your fingerprints on the sticky side of duct tape without being physically present when it was ripped off. If the evidence does put her at the scene of the crime, there is no way to explain it without putting KC on the stand.
Which opens her up to probably the most entertaining cross-examination we could possibly imagine. (Not that this is entertaining per se, but seeing a liar confronted with her lies is sweet justice.)
(Bold mine) You're right. If her fingerprints, epithelials or DNA are on the tape, they pretty much broadcast, "Casey Anthony killed her baby!"
BUT--there are alternate explanations. Some may be implausible, but others might be
almost plausible enough to spark some hope for the defense.
Toss in the ubiquitous "Well, there could be another person who lived at some time during Earth's history, somewhere on this vast planet, who had DNA similar to Casey Anthony's" reasonable doubt nonsense.
Cindy Anthony wasn't that far off-base when she said that "Science is just science." Before anyone vomits, let me say I am a scientist to the core--BUT there are an awful lot of people who do not trust it. (All you have to do is sit in on a science text book adoption hearing if you need evidence of this; I write science texts, and you'd be appalled at the information ---basic, noncontroversial information---people try to bar.)
Thing is, Casey is NOT OJ Simpson. She doesn't have fans. (Well, aside from the pathetic souls sending her commissary money; apropos of nothing, does anyone else find it positively brilliant that NG publishes their names on her show?) The public didn't love her before her heinous crime. She wasn't a football hero, or Mr. Hertz-Rent-a-Car, or even Mr. Semi-Pathetic Music Has-Been a la Phil Spector or Yesterday's




, a la Robert Blake. She was a nobody, and the public's knowledge of her is solely as a babykiller. She won't walk on celebrity.
You can bet that ol' Jose's reflux/angina/panic attack/whatever was spurred by an, "Oh,




! Now what?!" But I don't think, for even a second, he believed...well, I was going to say her protests of innocence, but now that I think about it, she's been too stony to even offer any of those. So let's just say, I don't believe he genuinely believed that she "is as much of a victim as everyone else" (words, I believe, he used, when discussing with Casey the impression he wanted to leave with the public--NOT that he wanted her to spout verbatim during a recorded phone call to be released per Florida Sunshine Laws).
We're not dealing with the sharpest tools in any bench, defense-wise. But there's plenty of obfuscation to be done, and you can bet the farm they'll be scurrying to kick up as much dust as they possibly can, to cloud the truth.
Still, I have NO doubt that Casey Anthony will be convicted of first-degree murder.
But I don't think the defense will come up empty in terms of alternative explanations. And I don't think she'll plead; she has shown nothing to indicate she'd be willing to even entertain the notion. She wants to walk, and fully expects to. She's
Casey. She's
special.
I completely agree that cross-examination would be entertaining--in a sort of perverse sense of the word. My wildest hopes have her on the stand, being subjected to just that; my most delusional fantasies have Casey firing her team, a la Ted Bundy, and representing herself. Now THAT would be justice.
Forgive my 4 a.m. rambling!