ispywithmylittleeye
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2024
- Messages
- 460
- Reaction score
- 1,722
I have my own theory but am curious what others thought.
Oh for sure the legal team and JR were in the wings. Dr. Phil said he could ask anything he wanted, but we all know that was BS. The R's have controlled every interview they have given even with police. I also believe that the R's or some close to the R's with power and money have paid off a couple DA's to create an unchargeable case. Hunter was buffoon but possibly a useful buffoon.I didn’t watch it (as far as I can remember), and have only seen brief excerpts over the years.
With that qualifier, I wonder if perhaps it was some part of a possible ’image’ rehabilitation effort? To put a ‘toe in the water’ and see the latest temperature on the public perception? (I would envision that the R legal team was there in the wings ready to ‘blow a whistle’ and call time out? And that it was heavily pre-agreed to any questions allowed etc? Speculation on my part…… but also based on past interactions with law officials and the police and district attorney in Boulder, CO.)
And as far as an unforeseen disaster, with a questionable investigative effort and IMO apparent unusual ‘allowances’ and ‘accommodations’ made by the DA to the family - including the so called family exoneration letter IIRC- there was nothing to lose?
For full disclosure from public evidence I have seen over the years, seems IMO that one or more person(s) in the household seem to have gotten away with something that was fatal to or resulted in the death of JBR. And that one, two, or perhaps three or more individuals might have been involved in an apparent cover up of the entire matter? MOO
Oh, I think it absolutely was all about the CBS special. And you're right, it did not quell the suspicions, it brought them back up to the surface. Since this case first hit public awareness, there has been much speculation that BR is on the spectrum. The Dr. Phil interview only heightened that speculation as he came across as extremely socially awkward and the creep factor of that smile (which very well could just have been nervousness) made him seem disingenuous and possibly guilty. But in legal terms, it apparently served its purpose.....his first statement publicly that as a 9 year old boy, he was innocent. Of course soon after the CBS special aired a lawsuit was filed which was eventually settled out of court. It was all just a little bit predictable.IMO this interview was to get ahead of the CBS Special that was set to target him as the suspect. It happened in the days leading up to the special. I think it was a disastrous idea. It did not quell the suspicions the CBS special brought. It, in fact, made them worse with his creepy smiling and his demeanor that still portrayed him as socially 10 yrs old. It could have partially been nerves, but that smile never left his face which to me was more than nerves. I feel like part of his smile said I did it, and I'm untouchable. Without the interview I think a large portion BDI would have faded away in time after the CBS special.
It is uncomfortable to watch. The optics are terrible.I remember watching that interview and I was farking uncomfortable. The look on Burke's face bothered me the entire interview, and I couldn't shake the feeling that he wasn't being honest or genuine. I don't care WHY or WHO decided it was a good idea to trot him out on the Dr. Phil Show, it was the WORST possible idea they could have came up with at the time....I don't know if Burke is guilty or not, but that interview really made me evaluate and reevaluate what I knew about the case. I came back to the same place, four people went in that house alive, and only three made it out alive.
JMO
My theory is that along with the CBS special the majority of people have come to the conclusion BDI and have been very good at uncovering information over the years and don't seem to be slowing down.I'm not sure, I've gone back and forth because there's no way people (including Burke) couldn't foresee that the entire interview would be picked apart and ultimately turn out to be disastrous. But I'm curious to hear your theory.
The R's said he was asleep at the time. I have my opinions. I have never heard what other people hear at the end of the 911 call. I am not sure anyone is talking or if it is just static. But I believe he was awake at the time of the 911 call, but in his room to feign sleep when the cops arrived. I also don't believe either parent searched the house because I think they knew exactly where she was. It was mighty convenient that JR finds the body after Officer Arndt asks him to search the house. Which to me is odd by the way, that a cop would ask someone to search their own house after police arrive. I have many different theories for what may have occurred but common denominator is RDI in all my theories.IMO it still seems difficult to know the motivation for the TV presentation. As many note above, it might well have been an attempt to brunt the upcoming TV episode on the case.
And it is difficult to know exactly what might have occurred that evening into morning. As tezi nicely states above, four people went into the residence that evening, and only three made it out alive. And IMO it seems all from the R’s, to some investigators, and the CO DA offices have played a role in obfuscating the facts or possible accountability.
IIRC I was always puzzled about two elements I seem to recall from early in the case: 1) whether or not BR was awake and present in the room or nearby when I believe the first 911 call was made (or was he supposedly asleep upstairs or in a bedroom - and nowhere within ear-shot when the ‘missing/kidnapped’ child ‘disclosure’ commenced by PR & JR; 2) whether or not JR was clear on which rooms had been checked by him initially and in what sequence and whether IIRC he had first gone upstairs to get BR, or was JR downstairs? And / or BR then came downstairs and when was that? It is going on 30 years so hard to remember.
In the end, IMO it is unfortunate and sad that there was no apparent real or determined attempt to seek justice (including criminally if applicable) for the ‘unexplained’ and untimely death of JBR. Even with grand jury indictments apparently drawn up. Irrespective of whether her death was perhaps accidental or intentional. MOO
Why did BR have a psychiatrist in Atlanta? He was 9, shy a month from 10 years old. Is this normal for a child?There could be something there that the parents did not take as seriously as they should have and then ultimately worked to have "swept under the rug".