What is Misty hiding, IF anything?

[Glassgirl]

I think that Misty and Ronald are both involved. No matter how hard I try, I cannot get past that 911 call and Misty and Ronald's words. The 911 tape has been rehashed too many times, but my immediate reaction was that Ronald was way over the top and now Misty is trying to stick with what Ronald has told her to say. Problem is, she cannot get her script straight because it is a lie, IMO. If she were telling the truth, her story would have never been so inconsistent.

Just the way I see it.

I feel exactly the same way you do.
I, like you, cannot get past that 911 call.
Nor can I get past Misty's inconsistencies.
The truth NEVER changes, unlike Misty's version of events have.
In my honest opinion, based on her own statements, I believe she is lying.

 

[Glassgirl]

I'm in the minority and believe that Misty is covering for Ron. I based my choice on the following facts:

• Misty's stories are consistently inconsistent --LE says she's the key to this case.
• Since early on both Ron and Misty have referred to Haleigh in the past tense
• Ron has continued to stick with Misty no matter how many times her story changes.

I totally agree.

 

[Emeralgem]

I believe Misty is covering for Ron.. No way would he ever cover for her or even allow her to live if he thought she had anything to do with Haleigh's disappearance...

 

[solveit]

What happened to Haleigh?

Opinions of the people involved in this case are not important. Facts solve crimes.

a.)Ron was at work when the abduction occurred.

b.)Misty left the house.

c.)The abductor felt confident they could get away with taking Haleigh.

How does all of this tie together? That is what the investigators are trying to find out. If no one confesses and no evidence is found, we may never know what happened to Haleigh.

 

[Indigo]

What happened to Haleigh?

Opinions of the people involved in this case are not important. Facts solve crimes.

a.)Ron was at work when the abduction occurred.

b.)Misty left the house.

c.)The abductor felt confident they could get away with taking Haleigh.

How does all of this tie together? That is what the investigators are trying to find out. If no one confesses and no evidence is found, we may never know what happened to Haleigh.

(respectfully bolded)

Hi, solveit. Speaking as one who believes that Ron may have been involved in Haleigh's disappearance it may help to explain why I still consider him to be in the suspect pool:




Obviously, for example, Ron`s alibi was that he was at work. And that`s firm, right?

SHAULAND: That`s correct. That is his alibi and he was at work. We were able to check that. However, again we don`t know what happened to Haleigh and we don`t when it happened.


http://www.studentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0902/27/ijvm.01.html

 

[kikid]

What happened to Haleigh?

Opinions of the people involved in this case are not important. Facts solve crimes.

a.)Ron was at work when the abduction occurred.
1)although Ron worked that night (fact) LE states they don't know what the crime is or when it happened. 2) There are no facts or evidence (known to the public) to substantiate an abduction. The only fact is that Haleigh is missing.

b.)Misty left the house.
This is not a fact, speculation at best.

c.)The abductor felt confident they could get away with taking Haleigh.
There is no evidence (known at this time) to substantiate an intruder/abductor. This is only one of many theories of the case that is being investigated by LE.

SEE my answers to your post above (bold mine).

The only facts I know of are
1. Haleigh is missing
2. Misty is the last known person to see her alive
3. The A/C guy is possibly the last non-relative to see her alive (if not then it is the school bus driver).
4. Haleigh attended school that day.
5. Ron picked her up at the bus stop.
6. Ron worked a shift some time that night/early morning.
7. Misty & Ron called 911 at 3:27 a.m.

 

[Donjeta]

I agree that the way both the Cummings and Croslin relatives have come together in defense saying that they believe that every word out of Misty's mouth seems to point out that they know or believe that R and M are somehow involved in this together and the complete truth must not come out. If I was a relative of a missing child whose primary caregiver is outlined in the media as a storyteller, I don't think that I could completely trust anything she says, even if I had thought that she was a nice girl earlier. I'd be bound to have some doubts and would probably say something like Crystal's said, along the lines of "I don't know what to think".

However, what is being concealed may not have anything directly to do with Haleigh being missing. Even if a complete stranger took Haleigh, there might be things that MC and RC felt they needed to conceal. Let's say there were drugs or some other incriminating evidence of an unrelated crime in the house, they might feel those things have to be hidden before calling 911 and it might explain the inconsistency about how long it took to call, and the relatives might agree that they didn't particularly want this information out.

 

[Indigo]

I agree that the way both the Cummings and Croslin relatives have come together in defense saying that they believe that every word out of Misty's mouth seems to point out that they know or believe that R and M are somehow involved in this together and the complete truth must not come out. If I was a relative of a missing child whose primary caregiver is outlined in the media as a storyteller, I don't think that I could completely trust anything she says, even if I had thought that she was a nice girl earlier. I'd be bound to have some doubts and would probably say something like Crystal's said, along the lines of "I don't know what to think".

However, what is being concealed may not have anything directly to do with Haleigh being missing. Even if a complete stranger took Haleigh, there might be things that MC and RC felt they needed to conceal. Let's say there were drugs or some other incriminating evidence of an unrelated crime in the house, they might feel those things have to be hidden before calling 911 and it might explain the inconsistency about how long it took to call, and the relatives might agree that they didn't particularly want this information out.

(respecfully bolded)

I considered this possibility in the beginning of this case, but hit a wall with it, because I can't imagine a parent who would cover anything, (no matter how incriminating it might be) if their child's life was in the balance. I'm reminded of the van Dams who came totally clean with their alternative lifestyle and drug use so that LE could concentrate on finding Danielle. JMO.

 

[Searchfortruth]

I'm in the minority and believe that Misty is covering for Ron. I based my choice on the following facts:

• Misty's stories are consistently inconsistent --LE says she's the key to this case.
• Since early on both Ron and Misty have referred to Haleigh in the past tense
• Ron has continued to stick with Misty no matter how many times her story changes.

You are not alone in those thoughts, I have tried to not post in this area because of my feelings about Ron and Misty. I don't have a lot of evidence to back up my suspicions, other than the different stories, but I can't shake it. The very first video of Ron, where he is pleading for Haleigh's return, left me with a bad feeling...I hope I am wrong.

 

[texasmommy39]

What about the presser with Justic Coilation. Take a look again.

 

[texasmommy39]

IMOO Cs covering her face says alot. No one hugged or comforted her but her mother and spokes person. That seemed odd to me.

 

[weasel]

No offense to anyone, but this girl doesn't seem savvy or sophisticated enough to conjure up a cover up. Seems to me the biological mother has pretty much told everything she knows about Ron and Misty, so I can't fathom what would be left to tell. The 911 call seemed very authentic to me, so I seriously doubt Ron or Misty are hiding anything. I believe it was an abduction.

 

[Short_Stuff]

I first thought Misty wasnt home, but now I think shes covering for Ron. I dont care if he was at work. There was a gap when he got home and said he was searching. Somethings fishy with him (and let us not forget there was NO sign of forceable entry!).
JMHO.

 

[Charla]

I know Misty is hiding something...here's how (yes, I'll be Captain Obvious):

Why in the world did she assume she was safe?!

If I wake up at 3am and one of my kids is gone, my backdoor is wide open, and I am the only adult in my house---I am going to call 911, run to a neighbors house, something!

I am not going to call my mom and everyone else in my circle! I have to get out of harm's way, because I don't know who/what the harm is. Misty, on the other hand, had to have known the source of the harm, because she stayed in that house "looking" for Haleigh...

The whole 911 call just adds even more trouble to this case. With regard to Ron, all along I have felt as though he knows exactly who he is talking to when he makes his pleas for his daughter (and he doesn't say her name for some odd reason).

 

[Charla]

(respecfully bolded)

However, what is being concealed may not have anything directly to do with Haleigh being missing. Even if a complete stranger took Haleigh, there might be things that MC and RC felt they needed to conceal. Let's say there were drugs or some other incriminating evidence of an unrelated crime in the house, they might feel those things have to be hidden before calling 911 and it might explain the inconsistency about how long it took to call, and the relatives might agree that they didn't particularly want this information out.

Don't you think LE would give them some type of immunity, isn't letting drugs/weapons charges slide worth saving a little girl's life, or at least finding out where she's at?

 

[Searchfortruth]

I first thought Misty wasnt home, but now I think shes covering for Ron. I dont care if he was at work. There was a gap when he got home and said he was searching. Somethings fishy with him (and let us not forget there was NO sign of forceable entry!).
JMHO.

Thats one of the biggest "red flags" to me, no forced entry and Ron swears he locks that door every night. Also, the kitchen light was turned on, don't know many predators that turn on lights. The conflicting story's that Missy has given. The way Misty looks at Ron for approval when she's telling the story on camera. Then the coincidence, Misty wakes up at 3 in the morning and notices Haleigh not in her bed, this just happens to be the exact same time that Ron arrives home from work. Instead of calling 911 right then she waits for Ron to come in and join her in the phone call. Again, I sure hope I am proven wrong.

 

[sunflowerchick]

I think I am in the minority here. I voted that she isn't hiding anything. I still hold out hope that MC and RC are telling the truth. I would think after a month if they weren't that LE would at least be holding them for something by now...

 

[Whisperer]

If there were drugs in the house (likely, IMO) didn't they have to get rid of them before LE arrived? Misty is hiding a lot, not the least of which is her drug connection.

 

[texasmommy39]

I agree that the way both the Cummings and Croslin relatives have come together in defense saying that they believe that every word out of Misty's mouth seems to point out that they know or believe that R and M are somehow involved in this together and the complete truth must not come out. If I was a relative of a missing child whose primary caregiver is outlined in the media as a storyteller, I don't think that I could completely trust anything she says, even if I had thought that she was a nice girl earlier. I'd be bound to have some doubts and would probably say something like Crystal's said, along the lines of "I don't know what to think".

However, what is being concealed may not have anything directly to do with Haleigh being missing. Even if a complete stranger took Haleigh, there might be things that MC and RC felt they needed to conceal. Let's say there were drugs or some other incriminating evidence of an unrelated crime in the house, they might feel those things have to be hidden before calling 911 and it might explain the inconsistency about how long it took to call, and the relatives might agree that they didn't particularly want this information out.

Did misty lie?:blowkiss:

 

[titanfan62702]

Did misty lie?:blowkiss:

Depends how you look at it. I was always told it was the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth... haven't seen anything about it having different versions.