So to be fair, I've considered both pre-meditated and an accident.
For this to be an accident, this could have been a drowning, could have been over medicated, or? So as an accident, ICA moved into coverup mode. Why? Fear of her parents? I couldn't see any indication at all that ICA was afraid of either of her parents - in fact saw many examples of when this woman ruled this family and was amazingly disrespectful to both her parents. Sp it must have been consequences vs saving her child. Accidents have emotional consequences but no legal consequences. So instead of calling 911 to see if her child could be saved, she took the time to put three pieces of duct tape over her face, apply a heart sticker on that duct tape, and almost immediately either put her in the trunk of the car, or took the time to wrap her in a blanket, two black plastic bags and another cloth bags, and put her in the trunk, to throw her off the side of the road a few days later. Lots of time to tell someone...but no.
Oh yes, and she put the duct tape on post-mortum - well no - because duct tape does not stick to anything wet.
If this was an accident, and she was just afraid of her parents, and the consequences, but was feeling grief, she must have shown it somehow - so it was in this weird way she was partying. I didn't see any change in her behavior at all except that she no longer had the problem of caring for her child. She was a wild one before Caylee "disappeared", and was one afterwards. We've seen the pre-event pictures.
The sexual abuse card? Did we see evidence? No - was we saw was a very very clever move by the defense team. There are those out there who always believe a sexual abuse claim because who would lie about that? Who indeed - maybe a woman who killed her child and doesn't want to pay the penalty?
The accident theory doesn't work for me. I can't come up with one thing that points me toward an accident. Pre-meditated? One, the presence of chloroform. Two, the time it would take to place that duct tape on a child's face. And it wasn't one piece it was three. The dump location. Never reporting the child missing. Dumping the decomp car. Lying to police about the Nanny. The list goes on.
The SA doesn't have to prove cause of death or motive. They don't. The jury is asked to examine the totality of the evidence and look for reasonable doubt as to the charges. I believe they will not find it.
As to the sentence - when push comes to shove, I'm a Canadian. It's not even about not believing in the death penalty, it's that I can't envision it - if that makes sense. So I voted LWOP and suspect it may very well be the death penalty. A cruel and heinous crime ..... IMO.