What's in the Minds of Her Mother, Father, Brother Right Now?

[Kimberlyd125]

Cindy never got to file for bankruptcy. Her sick creative use of the media money and decent peoples good will money bailed her out. Heck, even the BoA made a quick new great mortgage deal for her. It is all so sickening in the extreme!!!

But your post stated they were bankrupt in July of 2008.

So they weren't?

 

[suzihawk]

Ok, i get that is your opinion. But, what does any of that have to do with their mortgage???

Their mortgage has nothing to do with the case.

Actually, if anything, their mortgage payments provided shelter for Caylee everyday of her short life.

Why they didn't use any of the money they received for selling pictures of Caylee to ABC to pay their mortgage?

That's the connection between the case and the mortgage, IMO.

 

[Kimberlyd125]

I am just curious here in an angered way. Between George's $500 shirts and Cindy's court dresses alone, what do you think they cost. Not including the countless thousands of dollars of jewelry Cindy wore. OK, throw in the $1,000 matching shoes George and Cindy wore each day at trial. Never the same shoes twice of course.

Alright, lets make it easy. How much was the total fashion statement bill for the Cindy and George clothing show for the trial? And anyone thinking of a number under $40-50,000.00 dollars is far short of the truth here!!!

Where are these figures coming from?
$500 shirts?
$1,000 shoes?
Thousands in jewelry?

 

[Kimberlyd125]

Why they didn't use any of the money they received for selling pictures of Caylee to ABC to pay their mortgage?

That's the connection between the case and the mortgage, IMO.

How? HOW?
Paying their mortgage has nothing to do with the case.

 

[Schu7]

But your post stated they were bankrupt in July of 2008.

So they weren't?

My bad on put my facts out here. Sorry. The bank statements showed that the total dept and surpluses showed a negative total. The mortgage was behind in monthly payments. The main credit card was a bit above it its maximum limit of dept. Cindy's last savings would not have covered the bills.

Oh if we could see those statements now.............

 

[Schu7]

Where are these figures coming from?
$500 shirts?
$1,000 shoes?
Thousands in jewelry?

From people at the trial. From TV announcers. From my own eyes every day. From my wife and friends who know about these things. We had a sick game going following the floor show of clothes. And like everyone else, wondering where the money was coming from the pay for it all.

It was a good time filler for the slower dead parts of the trial.

 

[Schu7]

How? HOW?
Paying their mortgage has nothing to do with the case.

Making blood money off of Caylee? That is part of the case.IMO

 

[MissJames]

Of course it did. Cindy was in charge of the money. Cindy also allowed her money to be taken by casey the entire time. She shut her eyes to all the money disappearing from her account. The point is these two were certainly in a position to afford a small mortgage of $700.00. Due to cindy's outrageous spending habits and casey's stealing, they get a large reduction. Fair? I think not.

They used this case to promote their place in line for reductions in mortgage payments....taking advantage of the system, while other needy people were waiting for months to years.

They have a sense of entitlement . Imagine that :waitasec:

I guess our first clue was when Cindy told the public to get off their A$$e$ and help find Caylee,while she and George sat back to collect the donations coming in.
Well,that's not really fair to George.He spent entire days driving the giant billboard around ,just in case someone was coming back from a space mission and missed the news while away.

 

[Kimberlyd125]

Making blood money off of Caylee? That is part of the case.IMO

The "blood money" has nothing to do with the mortgage.

As someone posted above, they didn't use the "blood money" to pay their mortgage.

 

[Kimberlyd125]

From people at the trial. From TV announcers. From my own eyes every day. From my wife and friends who know about these things. We had a sick game going following the floor show of clothes. And like everyone else, wondering where the money was coming from the pay for it all.

It was a good time filler for the slower dead parts of the trial.

So those figures are basically made up.

 

[Schu7]

So those figures are basically made up.

Yes, made up from facts seen.

 

[Horace Finklestein]

How? HOW?
Paying their mortgage has nothing to do with the case.

It does if they pay it with blood money. Plus, they run a "charity" for kids and so their finances are relevant.

 

[suzihawk]

How? HOW?
Paying their mortgage has nothing to do with the case.

They made money - LOTS of money - selling videos and photographs of their dead grandchild to the media. Clearly they didn't use the proceeds to pay their mortgage. Instead they applied for, and received, a hardship to get their mortgage payments reduced. It's pretty clear to me how the two are connected.

BTW, there are many, many other just as qualified applicants (if not more so) that have most likely lost their homes or are still waiting for relief.

MOO

 

[Horace Finklestein]

The "blood money" has nothing to do with the mortgage.

As someone posted above, they didn't use the "blood money" to pay their mortgage.

Of course they did.

 

[MissJames]

They made money - LOTS of money - selling videos and photographs of their dead grandchild to the media. Clearly they didn't use the proceeds to pay their mortgage. Instead they applied for, and received, a hardship to get their mortgage payments reduced. It's pretty clear to me how the two are connected.

BTW, there are many, many other just as qualified applicants (if not more so) that have most likely lost their homes or are still waiting for relief.

MOO

And while they were NOT making their mortgage pay't they went on a cruise,had tattoos done and George now sports a diamond ear stud (IIRC)

 

[zeeks]

I am just curious here in an angered way. Between George's $500 shirts and Cindy's court dresses alone, what do you think they cost. Not including the countless thousands of dollars of jewelry Cindy wore. OK, throw in the $1,000 matching shoes George and Cindy wore each day at trial. Never the same shoes twice of course.

Alright, lets make it easy. How much was the total fashion statement bill for the Cindy and George clothing show for the trial? And anyone thinking of a number under $40-50,000.00 dollars is far short of the truth here!!!

Speaking as a total fashionista, clothes horse and shoe person, there is no way that CA spent that much money on clothes. Those little summer dresses are fairly cheap. I didn't notice a particularly expensive bag. Now, I'm not a jewelry fan nor was I scoping out her bag so I might have missed out on some of the pieces, but no way would I see their clothes budget as being outrageous. In fact, my mom who worked a factory job all her life not only dresses way better than CA but sports nicer jewelry.

 

[Schu7]

The "blood money" has nothing to do with the mortgage.

As someone posted above, they didn't use the "blood money" to pay their mortgage.

And just where has the mortgage money come from since then??? Trips, clothes, car, lawyers, etc..... My a small, now done disability pension pays well.:waitasec:

 

[ZsaZsa]

Why they didn't use any of the money they received for selling pictures of Caylee to ABC to pay their mortgage?

That's the connection between the case and the mortgage, IMO.

Why? They live their lives with maxed out credit cards, that's why. They are entitled to have what they want and pay for it later, if at all.
Of course there was a cruise to pay for too.

 

[GracieLu]

From people at the trial. From TV announcers. From my own eyes every day. From my wife and friends who know about these things. We had a sick game going following the floor show of clothes. And like everyone else, wondering where the money was coming from the pay for it all.

It was a good time filler for the slower dead parts of the trial.

now that made me laugh..... lol....

I have to say Schu7, you defend your posts very well.... Im very impressed!

 

[zeeks]

Thanks for posting the video....very helpful. The bit I bolded above....I assume you are referring to comments made about the Anthonys not responding to 'red flags'. I understand what you mean in your comment, but I don't think that this 'breakdown', or whatever it ended up being was by any means the only 'red flag', just as I don't think Ms. Anthony's umm.....problems, for lack of a better word, began shortly before the tragedy. I'm convinced....my opinion, mind you, but I'm convinced that as parents, there had to have been other 'signs' (red flags) over the years of raising her, that the Anthonys would have seen/heard/witnessed in various events and/or behaviors of their daughter, that by most standards in our society would be deemed 'abnormal'. Just seems to me there had to have been missed opportunities to help her, or at the very least, there were things that they could have 'kept an eye on', but apparently did not. An example that comes to mind is her stealing. How long was that happening, without ANY consequences from her parents whatsoever? It's also my understanding that her lying was a very, very long term thing. What parent sits back and lets that go on without doing anything about it?

Untimately, if the question is, how much responsibility for Caylee's death do the Anthonys bear, because they didn't look into, or follow up on 'red flags', I can't answer that. In fact, I will acknowledge that Ms. Anthony acted alone and made the choice to end her daughter's life, of her own volition. But I firmly believe that there is an element of prevention that was within her parents' control, particularly when she was younger and a minor child, that for whatever reason(s), they did not exercise.

Again, JMO.

The stealing, lying, immaturity, etc were huge red flags. Problem was twofold, 1) CA could not acknowledge the depth of her daughter's psychological problems and 2) the state would likely not remove Caylee from her mother's custody for the above problems (unless CA had her arrested for stealing and even then there would be a risk of what KC would do in re: to Caylee's continued contact with the Anthony's once she was released from jail).

Psychological problems such as what KC had doesn't lead to child being removed from home. The criminal activity would take her away for a period of time but as the biological mother, KC would maintain her rights once she was released from jail and serve her time for her crime.