Whoa! a new 48 Hours (April 16) Check out the trailer!

[Horace Finklestein]

Sounds like Baez found a way to get his jury consultants without the JAC paying.

 

[Ada]

That jury looks like those people who are hired for infomercials to sit in the audience and pretend to be amazed by the product.

 

[Horace Finklestein]

That jury looks like those people who are hired for infomercials to sit in the audience and pretend to be amazed by the product.

Yeah I'm not sensing a high collective iq in that room.

 

[kaRN]

I'm not watching 48hrs on Saturday and I'm not clicking on any link regarding the show now. Brave new world for me where I only accept my news on this topic filtered by you guys. Woohoo!!!
Thanks friends!

 

[kaRN]

These people are not Casey's peers! Guys, a black guy, and a disabled woman, none of which apply to Casey. Just saying...:truce:

All Caseys peers are already at Lowell so this was the best they could do LinasK. LOL!

They look like the waiting room of a walk in clinic IMO.:fence:

 

[mitzi]

Bless ya Scamperoo. I've been feeling it too these past few days myself. They've set up a meditation room for us to go to should we need it. It can be a comfort on days like this.

Bold mine.

I'm feeling so stressed that I think I need a mediCAtion room! :banghead:

 

[Whome?]

True, but the sunshine law just releases all of the raw data. It is not necessarily just the state's evidence. The laws allow the release of the 911 calls and the initial interviews and statements. So IF Casey was truly a victim, and the mother of a kidnapped child, then the Sunshine Law would allow us to see that.

She would have taken the cops to Sawgrass and the video cameras would have shown Zanny driving off in a U-haul with Caylee and her little white dog. The trip to Universal would have shown us Casey's office and we would have met Jeffrey, the guy who introduced her to Zanny.

So the reason that the DT is scrambling is that their client is a thieving, lying, coldblooded killer, and the law has brought those facts out into the Sunshine, imo.

:tyou:

 

[lauriej]

..bumping thread for tonight's action..

..i hope that someone nice will be putting this up on youtube for those of us that don't get the program locally??

 

[iluvmua]

..bumping thread for tonight's action..

..i hope that someone nice will be putting this up on youtube for those of us that don't get the program locally??

You can view it on the 48 Hours website; they always have full episodes up.

 

[LolaMoon08]

I appreciate everyone who watches the show tonight and who will be giving updates. I'm at work and won't be watching. It took everything I had not to DVR it (don't want to give them ratings. :innocent.

 

[momshrink]

and then..........there's this:

In the same program, former Anthony defense attorney Linda Kenney Baden says Anthony lied about a nanny kidnapping the toddler. “I think everyone knows that that was a lie,” Kenney Baden says. “Her actions have been her own worst enemy.”

Wouldn’t that violate attorney-client privilege?

“The general rule is as attorneys we are supposed to keep confidences and secrets of clients, even after we are no longer their attorney,” said Professor Bob Jarvis of Nova Southeastern University Law Center. “We take these things to our graves. There are limited instances where an attorney can reveal a client’s confidence and secrets.”

Jarvis said he didn’t think Kenney Baden’s statement would fit those limited instances.

Even if Kenney Baden’s comment is just her opnion, it seems unwise and unprofessional for an attorney to make such comments about a former client who has not had her day in court.

“One of the ethics rules is that you be fair to the court and not impede the administration of justice,” Jarvis said. “You can make an argument that by going on TV that you’re poisoning the jury pool and you’re making it harder to seat an unbiased jury. Even if you’re a former attorney, you’re an officer of the court. This is a duty you have to the judge.”

I think this is DT strategy to go with the testimony of the mental health experts - except now, the experts will not testify, so what did the DT gain???
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

 

[Steely Dan]

I was going to start a thread about this show being on tonight but found this one. All I can say is how the DT thinks this will help the case is mystifying. 48 hours has been known in the past to do a poor job of covering stories so I hope that doesn't happen here. I hope they present the prosecution and defense theories. If they do that it can only hurt the DT. JMO

 

[ynotdivein]

Hey peeps :seeya:

We are going to open a special thread for this viewing. I'll create the thread in a moment and lock it until quarter to 10 EST. Meanwhile, carry on!

 

[Steely Dan]

I think this is DT strategy to go with the testimony of the mental health experts - except now, the experts will not testify, so what did the DT gain???
:floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:

A little song, a little dance, a little seltzer down their pants. :loser:

 

[iluvmua]

I was going to start a thread about this show being on tonight but found this one. All I can say is how the DT thinks this will help the case is mystifying. 48 hours has been known in the past to do a poor job of covering stories so I hope that doesn't happen here. I hope they present the prosecution and defense theories. If they do that it can only hurt the DT. JMO

Can the State not say anything regarding this episode? Can they not file a motion to JP about this?

 

[Tiki]

Can the State not say anything regarding this episode? Can they not file a motion to JP about this?

Don't think so. Same reason he can't turn off the cameras in the courtroom - Freedom of speech.

 

[Snaz]

I appreciate everyone who watches the show tonight and who will be giving updates. I'm at work and won't be watching. It took everything I had not to DVR it (don't want to give them ratings. :innocent.

I have always wondered about that.... does a show get the credit of a viewer if it is DVR'ed as opposed to watched live?

Cause there have been many instances that I am interested to watch something just for curiosity, but don't want the station to get the rating increase of me watching, even if I am just one little ole person!

Anyone know? TIA!

 

[cluciano63]

They still determine ratings the old fashioned way, by Nielson Rating, calling selected households. In this day and age, you would think they could do it a better and more accurate way...

I don't think they can tell if you TIVO it

 

[Softail]

Can the State not say anything regarding this episode? Can they not file a motion to JP about this?

Heck yeah! They can say "Change of venue, my butt!" :great::woohoo:

 

[my_tee_mouse]

I'm going to watch it. I'm not convinced the teaser isn't showing us a "sample" mock jury that has nothing to do with the Caylee Marie Anthony murder case. Plus...when I saw the teaser for the umpteenth time, it was only showing one or two people standing when asked who would acquit. So I'm not sure if CBS has tried to back off a misleading teaser due to bad publicity, or if they decided to modify it for the hold-your-breath effect.