We do know that she had bled enough to need to be wiped down. And the coroner had made a comment that the small drops of blood in the panties did not seem to match the location of the vaginal injuries. Blood would deposit differently in the panty crotch depending on whether she was standing or lying down. I have always felt that she was redressed AFTER she was wiped down, and wearing originally different panties than those she had been wearing when found- namely the oversized 12s. And there was NO blood noted on the longjohns, This tells me that after she was wiped, the clean panties were put on her, than the wet lonhjohns. The panties became wet with urine from being in contact with the wet longjohns and not because urine was released in them. If it had, the "circular" areas of blood would have spread out- not been so "circular". The blood stain would have been diluted by the urine release. I feel a few drops of blood oozed out after she was redressed, and whoever put the longjohns on and placed her in the wine cellar never saw those drops of blood because they weren't visible through the lonhjohns. She was dead already, IMO, and could no longer bleed, bur blood can ooze from inside the vagina, were other small amounts of blood were seen by the coroner. This also explains the coroner's comments that the blood drops in the panties did not "match up" with the internal injuries.