But Tex, if they're gonna stalk her, they're not doing it for ransom, molesters/rapists operate differently than killers, and all of the above criminals remove their victims from the house- even David Westerfield. Moreover, the spiderweb on the windowsill in the basement was undisturbed, and there were no footprints in the snow! Also a criminal wouldn't draw little hearts in her palm and lovingly redress her, and would leave more of his DNA than just touch DNA. In contrast, John's fibers from his shirt were in JB's panties. There isn't an innocent explanation for that.
Hey again Linda
I think the stalking was to get info on the family and their habits in preparation of getting their daughter to molest, not for any ransom. IMO perhaps the note was written to scare the parents sorta: "I've been watching you, know where you're from, where you work and now I have your kid." JMO, but I don't think this person wanted to kill JB right away. Like Westerfield he had other plans. My guess is JB did something (kicked him?, made some noise?) and he got mad/scared and hit her, couldn't very well leave the home carrying a dead girl so took her downstairs where he strangled her and molested her then left.
The snow;
Snow on the Ground
http://jonbenetramsey.pbwiki.com/The+House
What Police Reported. Sergeant Paul Reichenbach had arrived at 6:45 AM and searched the outside of the house. He reported no footprints were found in the crusty/frosty snow which covered "much of the grass" (but the brick walkways were clear of snow) (Schiller 1999a:57). Many view this as evidence there could not have been an intruder.
However:
Crime Scene Photos. But it was later reported "In fact, police photographs taken before 9 a.m. the morning of JonBenet's death show much of the perimeter of the house, including walkways, free of snow." Photo 1 Photo 2.
What Media Reported. Newsweek reported that "there was only patchy snow on the property. JonBenet had ridden her Christmas present, a bike, on the backyard patio the day before" (Glick et al. 1998).
What Judge Carnes Concluded. However, "contrary to media reports that had discredited an intruder theory, based on the lack of a "footprint in the snow," there was no snow covering the sidewalks and walkways to defendants' home on the morning of December 26, 1996. (SMF P 139; PSMF P 139.) Hence, a person walking along these paths would have left no footprints" (Carnes 2003:90).
Precipitation Data. Internet poster Braveheart has done the most careful work in examining the temperature and precipitation data, concluding that one cannot rule out an intruder based on this evidence. Meteorologist Katrina Voss has reached a similar conclusion.
same link spiderweb:
Whether the observed web was attached "matters" only if the web was observed early enough that it could not have been spun during the morning of December 26.
Regardless of when the web was observed, Detectives Everett and Wickman disagree with Detective Idler about whether the web was attached to the grate; absent a photograph, this conflicting eyewitness testimony would appear to be unresolvable.