Why Patsy: What incriminates her most. One sentence only.

[Cherokee]

I never saw the pineapple

I never bought the pineapple

I never cut up the pineapple

I know nothing about the pineapple, except it was served with the wrong spoon.

:clap:

Excellent summation, TLYNN.


imo

 

[Barbara]

There is a thread at Webbsleuths specifically responding to this thread and its posters. I won't take the liberty of answering for any of the other posters, but will respond to the posts directed at me:

Jameson's response to my post:

Barbara posted, "Any mother who goes on national tv ONE WEEK after the brutal murder of a child and says they want to get on with their lives......... That's enough for me to think she's involved!"


My response - The Ramseys also said they had times when they considered suicide and the BORG thought THAT was evidence against them.... the BORG would take the sun rising as anti-Ramsey evidence if they needed to.

I never thought suicidal thoughts were evidence against them, although like most other things they say, NO WAY would either of them actually follow through. They love themselves, (individually, not each other) too much for suicide. It is still and will always be a HUGE sign that they wanted to get on with their lives ONE WEEK AFTER the brutal murder of their child. Spin it any way you like, it is not normal for any parent to say that after one week.

Ahh, for my favorite: I will refrain from making any IQ jokes, grow a brain jokes, etc. (just for you Amaaran)

Ashley
Member since 7-4-03
06-14-04, 02:48 AM (EST)

1. "RE: I can't resist"
In response to message #0

Oh dear!
I would also like to tell Barb that John and Patsy are not the people who stated they were computer illiterate.

I believe it was the McR's who said they didn't know anything about the Internet NOT the Ramsey's

That's so weak, soooooooo weak. If only they could get their facts STRAIGHT after all this time.

I can't believe they could spend so much time on something, yet, not have a clue what they're talking about.

Actually Ashley, not only did the Ramseys claim not to go on the internet, but Jameson herself has echoed that time and time again. I think you should discuss getting those facts straight directly from the source if you dare.

Oh Ashley, your thinking is sooooo weak and you are really vile after the things you posted about Tricia hoping to have her running with a lynch mob with torches. You are forever etched in memory by so many people.

Getting your facts straight is something you should have done very long ago.

Also, BTW, writing letters is NOT a symptom of schizophrenia. I think you should retract that and stop posting your ignorant "facts". I notice you never came back to that thread and explain your other schizophrenic theories. You can't just make them up so that you can fit Fleet White into this.

I can't believe you haven't a clue after so long and being on the forum that supposedly has all the facts. Perhaps a tutor might help. Remedial reading perhaps? There's help out there if you look in the right places. Of course, they don't teach manners or human decency, but reading is a start.

Just saying...............

I don't care if Amaaran deletes this, it was nice to post it, if even for a short while. I needed to do that.

 

[Britt]

There is a thread at Webbsleuths specifically responding to this thread and its posters. I won't take the liberty of answering for any of the other posters, but will respond to the posts directed at me...

Barbara, thanks for pointing this out. I see I've been quoted there for the first time ever. Well, unless you count the time she stole my Court TV transcript, but since I wasn't credited it's not quite the same. Are we flattered that we're quotable? lol.... But really, it's kinda sad that they must go a post-stealing to conjure up discussion.

 

[Barbara]

Barbara, thanks for pointing this out. I see I've been quoted there for the first time ever.

MAZEL TOV! (as we say in my neck of the woods).

Well, unless you count the time she stole my Court TV transcript, but since I wasn't credited it's not quite the same.

You are in a great deal of company. What they don't make up, they steal

Are we flattered that we're quotable?

I guess if we are quoted, we must hit a nerve, so yeah, I guess we're on the right track.

lol.... But really, it's kinda sad that they must go a post-stealing to conjure up discussion.

But not unusual, and there is no other discussion of substance there anyway.

It's either BORG threads or "responding to" threads or "answering questions from BORG" threads.

Keep up the good work Britt! Soon, you'll have your name in lights over there!

:blowkiss:

 

[SisterSocks]

MAZEL TOV! (as we say in my neck of the woods).



You are in a great deal of company. What they don't make up, they steal



I guess if we are quoted, we must hit a nerve, so yeah, I guess we're on the right track.



But not unusual, and there is no other discussion of substance there anyway.

It's either BORG threads or "responding to" threads or "answering questions from BORG" threads.

Keep up the good work Britt! Soon, you'll have your name in lights over there!

:blowkiss:

OK what i'm saying Is in a joking manor LOL


I think the only reason Jon Benet hasn't been exhumed is because Patsy wouldn't be able to decide which paegant dress to re-bury her in :slap: :slap: :slap: :waitasec: :waitasec: :waitasec: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel:

 

[Seeker]

IMO Patsy didn't do it. The reason the vast majority of people think she did was due to Steve Thomas leaking to Vanity Fair and then writing his book. He believed it and he leaked info so others would believe it.

IMO someone wanted the evidence to point to Patsy and away from himself. Someone who told us all it was an inside job...

 

[jubie]

Jubie.... IMO you need to stay on topic stating what you feel is the composition of another posters brain violates Tos and to do so to often will result in a period of away time from WS.
Thank you for you attention in this matter..

Debate the issue NOT the posters.

Amra

 

[jubie]

Oops sorry, back on topic.

Why Patsy:

Because there is no other reasonable explanation for her behavior following her daughters tragic death. None!


Jubie

 

[Seeker]

Jubie, that's not what I wrote, please re-read my post.

Who said it was an inside job? JOHN RAMSEY!
Why did so many people shift their focus to Patsy and why? Because Thomas leaked to Vanity Fair about the evidence that incriminated her in his opinion that's why.

edited so as not to start a problem for Amraann.

 

[Britt]

IMO Patsy didn't do it. The reason the vast majority of people think she did was due to Steve Thomas leaking to Vanity Fair and then writing his book. He believed it and he leaked info so others would believe it.

I disagree, Seeker. Evidence is evidence. Leakage doesn't change the evidence, and who did the leaking doesn't change the evidence. IMO at least Thomas didn't actively damage/destroy the case like Hunter et al (also leakers) did.

IMO someone wanted the evidence to point to Patsy and away from himself. Someone who told us all it was an inside job...

I agree that John was involved. IMO both John and Patsy were involved. I don't believe for a NY minute that either of these narcissists would sacrifice him/herself for the other.

On the morning of the 26th both John and Patsy offered up names of suspects faster than you can say "inside job." These framees included ex-employees of Access Graphics and Linda Hoffmann-Pugh. That's what I think John meant by his statement to Arndt.

 

[Jayelles]

Do I take it that you think John Ramsey killed JonBenet? I'd be interested to hear your theory.

Edited to say - jameson just posted that "Seeker is not BORG". Is she confused or am I confused?

 

[Nedthan Johns]

ROLFLMAO that was good :woohoo:

 

[Seeker]

Hi Jayelles, you know I waiver on suspects, but for the life of me I can no longer believe that Patsy was involved. I think she would cracked under pressure long ago. John was Mr Iceman though. He wasn't visibly upset when the cops got there, he was the one who sent Burke away that morning, he was too in control IMO. He also knew the proper protocol to follow in regards to notifying LM security staff, yet he has Patsy call the local police and never calls LM?
And he tried to flee the state within 30 minutes of finding JB's body? Doesn't want police protection, oh no, he wants to run to the other side of the country! He is in control, completely, takes a walk by himself that evening, refuses to speak to police and stalls them off...I have a list here somewhere....

 

[Seeker]

Hi Britt, nice to see you. I disagree with you on that though. Nobody had a clue what any of the evidence was before ST leaked to Vanity Fair. IMO the evidence against Patsy was planted to make suspicion fall on her.

Looking waaaaay back, the initial suspect was John Ramsey. Linda Arndt was there...she heard and saw things we still don't know about and she was terrified of John.

I think the only role Patsy has had was in the cover-up and declinations of being JB's murderer.

 

[Britt]

I think she would cracked under pressure long ago.

Me, too, IF she didn't have John, drugs, and the fortress of smoke-blowing friends and, oh yeah, lawyers and more lawyers. It also helps to be a self-serving narcissist with one foot planted firmly in fantasyland.

 

[Nedthan Johns]

The both deserved the electric chair. No matter which one of them is the ultimate killer. They both killed her and are both responsible, however I think with what evidence we have, most certainly it would bring a conviction of Patsy Ramsey.

 

[Britt]

Hey Seeker

Well I certainly believe now that John was involved, which I didn't used to believe... that is, I used to think he came late to the cover-up, but now IMO he was actively part of it from the get-go.

But whether or not he planted evidence doesn't change the facts and evidence since "planting" is simply an interpretation of the evidence.

In any event, I don't see Patsy as anyone's patsy I suppose I could find that easier to believe IF she hadn't already been using JonBenet the way she was--as a sexualized pintsized version of what Patsy wanted to be. IMO Patsy was acting out some serious pathology there.

Whichever one of them bashed JB on the head, they're both involved IMO either as an abuser or killer.

Y'know, lately, watching that creepy John at work on his political career, I've even wondered if maybe JB's murder was premeditated by BOTH John and Patsy as a means to propel themselves into the spotlight. They sure wasted no time getting on TV to introduce themselves to the world.

 

[Cherokee]

Barbara, thanks for pointing this out. I see I've been quoted there for the first time ever. Well, unless you count the time she stole my Court TV transcript, but since I wasn't credited it's not quite the same. Are we flattered that we're quotable? lol.... But really, it's kinda sad that they must go a post-stealing to conjure up discussion.

Britt and Barbara,

I think it's very telling that Jameson and her followers have to steal posts from WS and FFJ and take them over to Webbsleuths just to have something to talk about.

You don't see anyone constantly stealing posts from Webbsleuths and bringing them here.

Of course, that won't happen because the Webbsters never say anything worth debating. It's all name calling. BORG this and BORG that. Same old, same old.

Jameson should call Webbsleuths "Forum of Broken Record."


IMO

 

[Show Me]

John had to be involved in it...after all he didn't try to stop Patsy from calling over upteen million friends...even though the foreign faction was monitoring him so closely they'd cut off JonBenet's head if he so much as talked to a stray dog.

I think it's verrrrrrryyyyyyy interesting both Wecht and Hodges wrote several books (which LW ignored and didn't even bother to comment on, much less sue). Both have similar opinions in which they believe both Ramseys are involved and JonBenet was sexual abused most likely in an incest situation.

 

[vicktor]

Jameson should call Webbsleuths "Forum of Broken Record."


IMO

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: