I have noticed that over the years there is little to no discussion about the backward comma in $18,000 on the first page of the ransom note (see my post #77 above).
That backward comma can actually be evidence that two people were composing and writing the note -- the writer sitting on one side of the table and the "editor", so to speak, sitting on the opposite side of the table directly across from the writer. It's not likely the writer would make a backward comma. But if a person reached across the table, with the handwriting on the paper appearing upside down to him, he could very easily have written the backward comma.
It's not a smoking gun that two people were engaged in writing the note, but it does SUGGEST there were two people composing and writing it together.
BlueCrab
That backward comma can actually be evidence that two people were composing and writing the note -- the writer sitting on one side of the table and the "editor", so to speak, sitting on the opposite side of the table directly across from the writer. It's not likely the writer would make a backward comma. But if a person reached across the table, with the handwriting on the paper appearing upside down to him, he could very easily have written the backward comma.
It's not a smoking gun that two people were engaged in writing the note, but it does SUGGEST there were two people composing and writing it together.
BlueCrab