- Joined
- Jul 13, 2011
- Messages
- 5,322
- Reaction score
- 28,269
Oh I'm sure it's not valid, I just want to know why he thinks it is.
So, I am trying to figure out what evidence his mother can offer for Brooks defense. Unless, he has another brother, named "Darrell". And she can testify to that, thus bringing in reasonable doubt.
Just a thought.
I don't see what she can add to the defense here. He had a bad childhood? He wasn't on medication? Since he discarded the insanity defense, that is off the table.
This is insane. Why is this judge letting this incredibly angry, mentally ill man argue semantics in her courtroom? I don't get why he's allowed to just stomp and scream all over everybody.
Agreed. IMO, he likes being the center of attention, as his own "lawyer" he gets to call the shots. So, IMO, he is milking for all its worth to him. I especially liked it when he said he figured out what the prosecution team was doing, "coaching" the witnesses. That was hilarious, because they didn't ask questions from witnesses that had nothing to offer?I'm not sure why he called anyone to testify.
My understanding is DB is bringing his momma to the stand to validate his claim that Erica gave him the photos. I don’t understand what that has to do with the price of tea in China. He is on trial for the parade massacre. He is not on trial for the argument he had at Frame park with Erica. It seems like he is trying to prove he was “right” in regards to that argument, therefore he is not responsible for the parade massacre.
All MOO.
EP told Atty Witchow that she gave those photos to Michelle and that person gave them to his mother, who gave them to Brooks. EP told him she has never sent him a letter since he's been jailed and that he has called her 37 times. She did not accept any of his calls.My understanding is DB is bringing his momma to the stand to validate his claim that EP gave him the photos. I don’t understand what that has to do with the price of tea in China. He is on trial for the parade massacre. He is not on trial for the argument he had at Frame park with EP. It seems like he is trying to prove he was “right” in regards to that argument, therefore he is not responsible for the parade massacre.
All MOO.
Yes - I just watched the That Chapter video on Brice. He is disgusting, IMO. Killing 2 kids for his "gang" stuff. Dumb. So dumb and unnecessary. Their poor momBrice Rhodes has been doing similar and worse for six years in Jefferson Co, KY courtrooms.
![]()
GUILTY - KY - Maurice Gordon, 16, & Larry Ordway, 14, brothers, slain, Louisville, 22 May 2016 *3 guilty*
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) Police are conducting a double homicide investigation following the deaths of two men in Louisville. Louisville Metro Police Department spokesman Dwight Mitchell tells news outlets that the two men were found dead Sunday afternoon in an alley...www.websleuths.com
DB - like behaviors? Domestic abusers who are mentally ill have been around since the beginning of time.Oh, but he IS being allowed! This has been shown daily...over and over. Who is really in control of the courtroom, right now?
Welcome to the DB show.
IMO, The People of WI, and Waukesha specifically ought to be fully aware of this sickening and victim harrassing fiasco, and judge (and vote) accordingly to change things. IMO, this abhorrent show will not stop in Waukesha County. Because of the notoriety NOW of this case, I expect more DB - like behaviors from many seasoned criminals, across this country. Buckle up Court rooms!! And, if you...The people... want to change things, you know what you need to do!
Judge needs to put her judge robe on and stop feeding the troll, DB. She feeds into his arguments by arguing with him. She is helping him with his defense one argument at a time. She should not have told him his stare down made her scared. I’m sure he loved it. Does she not realize this??
That makes sense. But she should not have let it get that far. She needs to stop arguing with him and shut it down. He loves the attention.I watched several attorneys comment on this and they said it was the right thing to do. It needed to be put on the record.
She would also be asked, was that your red suv? Did you lend him your car that day? Essentially she would be sealing his fate with her own words. I doubt she wants to do that.I think he may be relying on his mother to be there by choice and I am not so sure that will happen. She has been watching this trial. She would be in a position of having to answer the question "did you send those photos to your son of that baby?" and I assume she would have to answer yes which then shows her son in one of many lies. That whole deal really told the jury much about the person on trial. DB should know enough to know his phone calls are recorded.
That makes sense. But she should not have let it get that far. She needs to stop arguing with him and shut it down. He loves the attention.