I would think even some very cleaver defense attorney could have delved into his background and built a case for his mental issues etc. however at the end of the day not sure the result would have been any different.
My reaction is about the same. This somehow does not look right Sue Opper is at the event today introducing her and she did not take long to start making the rounds. She is using this trial that was seen by the public to really propel her career. Basically I doubt I would agree with many of her stands knowing she is ultra conservative and the balance of power is at stake in Wi. She will probably win not because of anything other than DB case. Nope this does not look right at all. Also I was turned off at her roll out today as she thumbed thru papers to answer some very general questions.Ugh. I really dislike that she’s doing interviews talking about this case as she’s running a campaign. Even Judge Ito in the OJ Simpson case stayed quiet after the trial. My distaste for this judge is increasing. JMO. I know many love this judge. I just don’t see it.
Right. I couldn’t even watch 1 of the full interviews all the way through. Just so cringeworthy! There are at least a couple from my understanding. In addition to the presser/announcement. Extremely poor taste to do this. So soon after sentencing. Reeks of opportunism. And I’m not impressed in the least with her answers just like I wasn’t impressed with her handling of DB during trial. I wouldn’t vote for her just based off of that.My reaction is about the same. This somehow does not look right Sue Opper is at the event today introducing her and she did not take long to start making the rounds. She is using this trial that was seen by the public to really propel her career. Basically I doubt I would agree with many of her stands knowing she is ultra conservative and the balance of power is at stake in Wi. She will probably win not because of anything other than DB case. Nope this does not look right at all. Also I was turned off at her roll out today as she thumbed thru papers to answer some very general questions.
i have to wonder now with the appeal starting up how that works. I guess as long as she does not mention the case at all she can continue to campaign. She seemed beg off any questions of relevance such as sentencing guidelines with the answer she will use on everything...can't discuss since it COULD come before the court. She reminds me in spirit of Sarah Palin up in Alaska.Right. I couldn’t even watch 1 of the full interviews all the way through. Just so cringeworthy! There are at least a couple from my understanding. In addition to the presser/announcement. Extremely poor taste to do this. So soon after sentencing. Reeks of opportunism. And I’m not impressed in the least with her answers just like I wasn’t impressed with her handling of DB during trial. I wouldn’t vote for her just based off of that.
Y’all Darrell Brooks has indicated if these cases go to trial he wants to represent himself. I hope they settle and don’t give him the opportunity to be in the spotlight again. This is a sick, pathetic individual and needs to be locked away never to be seen again!
Not laughing at you, @Weki , but at the potential spectacle of another imho Brooks court circus sideshow.
Box fort, anyone?
View attachment 399955
Darrell Brooks to go back on trial this summer in Milwaukee
WISN - Mar 23, 2023