GUILTY WI - Darrell Brooks Rams Car Into Holiday Parade Crowd - 6 dead/61 Injured - Waukesha #3

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #741
alrighty, I am here and strapped in for a bumpy day. I see the disruption tactics from defendant have already begun.
 
  • #742
it appears that someone feeds him this info at night...could by mother not sure and he comes in seemingly calm...shuffles his fort around and then pounces. I love the fact that he actually said that many will want to speak at sentencing...don't think he means victims. Apart from his mother would they drag some extended family in there? Has there been anyone there during trial for this guy?

I’m pretty sure the only thing he had researched is how to get off these charges on a technicality.
 
  • #743
Here comes the “hold me in contempt”… again!
His #1 hope and delay tactic but it never works!!!
 
  • #744
First time I've heard this one: "Have I acted in dishonor?"
 
  • #745
I’m so done with this judge! At this point I’m more frustrated with her than him. He’s like a broken record, we know what he’s up to. She still won’t acknowledge the futility of giving multiple chances after saying this is the last chance! Gah! JMO
I feel vey differently. I think she has the patience of a saint and is preserving the record for appellate purposes. The more opportunities she affords him to show his hindquarters on the record the better.
 
  • #746
  • #747
  • #748
I’m so done with this judge! At this point I’m more frustrated with her than him. He’s like a broken record, we know what he’s up to. She still won’t acknowledge the futility of giving multiple chances after saying this is the last chance! Gah! JMO
It’s so frustrating. I totally understand. But she has to give him multiple chances to satisfy law. This man started this trial with the intent to cause a mistrial, frustrate the judge, delay the court, and set up his argument for an appeal. He’s already brought up jury nullification multiple times. This poor judge has to put everything on the record and she has to have precedent to do it. She is doing better this week, clearly she (or her law clerks) researched these types of cases
because she came ready on Monday with relevant case law to back her decisions up.

We’re so close! It’s almost done!
 
  • #749
She needs to tell him she is going to proceed and he needs to stop talking.
Then she needs to ignore him and proceed.
 
  • #750
I can't believe she's letting him come back!!!
 
  • #751
She needs to tell him she is going to proceed and he needs to stop talking.
Then she needs to ignore him and proceed.
She’s bringing him back in again! Unbelievable.
 
  • #752
He probably just wants to tell her something. How long before he gets sent out this time?
 
  • #753
I wonder how many times the defendant will be switching courtrooms today? The jury needs to be able to listen to the jury instructions and not be run in and out of the courtroom. My opinion only.
 
  • #754
See already!! Send him back.
 
  • #755
Oh did she make a mistake bringing him back. What is this "dishonor". Does she really think he will just sit there???
 
  • #756
Stellar job judge!! Just stellar! There was no way to predict what he was going to do! No way! /sarcasm/
 
  • #757
Jack-in-the-box jury again. What they must be thinking….
 
  • #758
and he's out again...
 
  • #759
what a waste of time. I expect him to do this a few times but she should just get thru the instructions. Already 930am. This jury no doubt is pretty clear on what is going on having seen some of his behavior first hand.
 
  • #760
LOL…..how am I acting in dishonor……somebody needs a dictionary to look up what dishonor means and that entity would not be the court……the jury hasn’t been able to sit down in the jury box yet……my opinion only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
80
Guests online
3,328
Total visitors
3,408

Forum statistics

Threads
632,609
Messages
18,628,951
Members
243,213
Latest member
bleuuu_
Back
Top