- Joined
- Aug 18, 2003
- Messages
- 94,255
- Reaction score
- 321,622
She's either competent or not. Expected to be by next March? What?
I would guess they would load her up on meds....
She's either competent or not. Expected to be by next March? What?
I would guess they would load her up on meds....
@gitana1
@Mercedes
@PrairieWind
I know we have other attorneys but my head hurts and those are the only 3 I remember right now. Any of you have any thoughts on this?
Competency hearing set for girl, 11 accused of stomping infant to death in Chippewa County
The girl was given a mental evaluation earlier this month. The psychologist determined the girl is still not competent to proceed on a homicide charge at this time, but she is expected to be competent by next March, said prosecuting attorney Richard Dufour.
Dufour objected to the idea of allowing the girl to waive the preliminary hearing.
“Our position is you can be either competent or incompetent,” Dufour said after the hearing. “You can’t be ‘somewhat competent.’”
A competency hearing slated for July 3 will be the next court date in the matter...."
New: Why intentional homicide charge was filed in infant murder case (with clip)
In a past interview, the girl said she knew more than one strike would kill Hunter.
Based on the final autopsy report, prosecutors determined it’s clear she knew her actions would kill him.
This case makes me feel ill.
I can't help but wonder if the girl had exhibited brutal/violent tendencies before this incident. Will we ever know?
That poor little 3 month old. The parents' grief must be horrible.
I need some coffee.... And I need to go back and read why she was alone with the baby.
I'm not surprised. I knew this kid had done it on purpose from the beginning. There is no way any kid that ages "panics" and sort of accidentally stomps an infants head and kills them. What's interesting to me is how she went from somehow functioning in society to intentionally killing an infant one day to no longer being competent to stand trial. Did she seem unstable before being left alone with the baby? Now she's a total mess and not competent to stand trial? Is she traumatized by the actions she chose? I know I'm not expressing myself well here. I need some coffee.... And I need to go back and read why she was alone with the baby.
Right? I find everything about this case disturbing.I don't understand the concept - if she's too ill to sit for trial, how can she be considered mentally healthy enough to be culpable at the time of the crime?