True. But if he really was in the Army, then I think he would know the difference between turbans worn by the Sikhs and their Temple, as opposed to a mosque and Muslims. JMO
Many people don't. I didn't until my husband informed me.
:blushing:
True. But if he really was in the Army, then I think he would know the difference between turbans worn by the Sikhs and their Temple, as opposed to a mosque and Muslims. JMO
Interesting. I think a loner white supremacist is just as scary as a white supremacist who is part of a group. That doesn't really convince me this isn't motivated by race or religion.
I took that to mean he acted alone. In other words, there is no "group" behind this attack and therefore no immenent danger that there are others out there from the same group planning other attacks. IMO
If he's a white supremacist, of course it was probably racially motivated.
Or at least had something to do with it.
Still early. I'm sure we will hear a lot more at tomorrow mornings briefing.
NBC News other new info here alsoOfficials told NBC News the suspect, who served in the U.S. Army, had many tattoos. The suspect had some kind of radical or white supremacist views but, as far as officials said they had heard, he was not in any kind of radical organization. His previous run-ins with law enforcement involved traffic offenses, they said.
A law enforcement official told NBC News the gunman was dressed in a white T-shirt and black tactical-style pants, which had several pockets for holding ammunition magazines. He was armed with a single handgun, the official said. His name was not released but police say they have a tentative ID and were searching his home.
I agree.
Although I think the Movie shooting was also a hate crime.
You have to have a lot of hate in your heart to kill a bunch of innocent people.
I know you are talking about the recent legal distinction of the words "hate crime".
I just think all murders are hate crimes.
I meant in the legal sense. In hate crimes victims are targeted for who they are and not because of anything they have done.
Well, he could have been against Pakistanis conceivably. A Sikh Pakistani is not Muslim, obviously, but they are still Pakistani. Was he looking for Punjabi folk???
We have been active enough in Pakistan for that to be a hypothetical motive above and beyond vile racism.
I'm not the least bit convinced of that, but it's not exactly like Sikhs are light-years away from Muslims ethnically even if they seem it religiously. Look up the Punjabi region; you'll see what I mean![]()
Possible, but the Sikh population is relatively small in Pakistan. Not exactly a country that you would automatically associate with Sikhism. There are only 50,000 Sikh's in Pakistan compared to 20 million in India. There are actually a lot more Sikh's in the US than Pakistan.
Well, I kept mentioning Punjabi this and that for a reasonIt being the birthplace of Sikhism and all... I pretty much do associate the two somewhat, yeah
![]()
I found a link that might help folks with the history (the specific bit I'm referring to, I mean):
http://sikhinstitute.org/july_2008/8-msasi.htm
Theoretically, if you were looking for the ethnic group that is the majority in Pakistan, you'd be looking for Punjabis. But most Pakistanis are Muslim Punjabis, it's true.
I don't keep up enough with neo-Nazis to know whether race or religion matters more when it comes to their hatred of folks in that area!
Chances are, if it's a racist &%$^#@#! who did this, he just doesn't know the difference (or similarity) between all the turbanned folks, though, yeah.