Woman Gives Birth To Octuplets In California

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,181
I can't check but can someone go to www.kfi640.com and there is an audio on the front page called octomom offered help. Maybe that is it if anyone can check.
 
  • #1,182
This whole case really leaves a sour taste in my mouth. Especially since I along with many here live in CA and are footing the bill for her outrageous behaivor.

Ms Suleman just continues to show she's not capable of raising all of those kids. Why on earth would you pay so much for a FOUR BEDROOM HOUSE when you clearly need more room. There's houses out there in America (in other areas) that you could buy for that kind of $$$ that'd have many more bedrooms than that. Assuming Nadya gets her own room, that's like 4.6 kids avg for the other 3 bedrooms left. Not to mention the elder Mrs Suleman is in foreclosure to the tune of $22+K, but Im sure Nadya or someone else will be getting this other house (as in legal title in her name, not her mother's). How is Nadya going to pay for all of this? With no job, drawing on her education funds to pay for the kids, etc.

Sorry but she IS being selfish. She IS exploting her kids. She IS getting "welfare" of sorts, in the form of food stamps & disability payments - plus MediCal will be paying the probably $2Mil hospital bill. Depsite Nadya's insistence she's not.

How is this all legal that we the taxpayers are being stuck paying for HER MESS? People should not be given IVF unless they can pay for the babies on their own.

edit = I also feel a FULL INVESTIGATION into Ms Suleman's finances should be done PRIOR to any more benefits being paid. All of those welfare related benefits are based on your income. Well if she's earning money, guess what, she should pay.
 
  • #1,183
http://www.[link removed]/forum1/message731579/pg1


http://sulemanwithoutpity.blogspot.com/2009/02/angels-in-waiting-offered-its-services.html


Found this, but still doesn't really elaborate in specifics of the exact nature of help. The 135 K they're talking about is the offer of Angels in Waiting willing to care for the kids for 6 months of care and that normally would cost $135K a month. They won't give her ANY money whatsoever. They will cover her medical & emotional services offered up.

I believe that's what's going on.

I say she should take it. She won't make a dime, can't exploit these kids at all and would get the MENTAL & emotional help she needs. I think THIS may be a very good thing for the children.
 
  • #1,184
  • #1,185
Thank u patty I knew I heard it.our news said if she didn't take it they would try and ge cps to intervene or something
 
  • #1,186
Haven't read the article, but now Gloria Allred is involved????

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/02/attorney-gloria.html

Just posted sort of a 'synopsis' right above your post.

AND I doubt the very selfish celebrity crazed mother will take it. She wants the actual MONEY in her hands, not 'help' for her children. :mad: (my opinion only of course)

:clap: I commend you Alred, for launching the complaint as well. This is the best offer & idea yet for the children. AND Nadya wouldn't have them taken away (for those who want her to keep her kids), it's a win win win all around.

But seriously, I believe she won't take it at all.
 
  • #1,187
Gloria Allred and Angels in Waiting are one in the same?

I find it sickening that Allred would involve herself in this situation. Either accept the help OR I'll turn you in???? WOW, I think I've heard it all!:eek:
 
  • #1,188
Glo got involved a week or more ago
 
  • #1,189
Just posted sort of a 'synopsis' right above your post.

AND I doubt the very selfish celebrity crazed mother will take it. She wants the actual MONEY in her hands, not 'help' for her children. :mad:

Thanks PattyCake- I didn't realize until after I posted that you were saying the same thing. OMG! If Nadya/Natalie doesn't take this offer up, she's definately a nut case.
 
  • #1,190
Glo got involved a week or more ago

That's what the article said! I used to respect her (and I suppose all of this is a good thing for the kids) but her "do it or I report you" technique is kind of gross!
 
  • #1,191
Gloria Allred and Angels in Waiting are one in the same?

I find it sickening that Allred would involve herself in this situation. Either accept the help OR I'll turn you in???? WOW, I think I've heard it all!:eek:

No, she's trying to negotiate the 'deal' between the Angels in Waiting and the mom. But Nadya is not answering to her offer. A nurse started & runs the nonprofit group.

Personally if you take time to read the offer, it's a very very good offer. To pay for at least 6 months of medical & emotional help for ALL the children & the mom, to have nurses help her at 8 hour shift intervals, etc..

I think Allred might be the hero in the end for this. Really read what they're attempting to do. It's a very kind thing to help all of them. Isn't that what everyone wants? For this woman to get serious help in all aspects of her life? For me, if nurses were with her all the time helping for the next 6 months plus ++ , she's getting emotional & mental help, she's getting medical bills paid, etc I think she couldn't ask for a better offer ever. AND makes me happy because no $$$ is in her hands directly at the moment.
 
  • #1,192
No, she's trying to negotiate the 'deal' between the Angels in Waiting and the mom. But Nadya is not answering to her offer. A nurse started & runs the nonprofit group.

Personally if you take time to read the offer, it's a very very good offer. To pay for at least 6 months of medical & emotional help for ALL the children & the mom, to have nurses help her at 8 hour shift intervals, etc..

I think Allred might be the hero in the end for this. Really read what they're attempting to do. It's a very kind thing to help all of them. Isn't that what everyone wants? For this woman to get serious help in all aspects of her life? For me, if nurses were with her all the time helping for the next 6 months plus ++ , she's getting emotional & mental help, she's getting medical bills paid, etc I think she couldn't ask for a better offer ever. AND makes me happy because no $$$ is in her hands directly at the moment.

Thanks PattyCake- you explained it better than the LATime article (and explained it better than I could comprehend).

I'll read closer before I get angered (next time)... lol!
 
  • #1,193
Do you think that Nadya/Natalie can be helped mentally and emotionally?
 
  • #1,194
Thanks PattyCake- you explained it better than the LATime article (and explained it better than I could comprehend).

I'll read closer before I get angered (next time)... lol!

:blowkiss: aaa, you're welcome. And in return, you're more 'positive' posts towards the octomom has made me rethink my stance & try to have some compassion for her. (Lord KNOWS I'M trying). It's so hard to take children from a mom without major reasons so I guess the better thing would be is to surround her with the support her kids need, give them a healthy happy mom who is facing a lifetime of challenges. The money will go away, the help will go away, her parents are in their 70's and will go away too. So who will she have? I know this woman really does not know what is facing her.

Looking at a $1.25 Million dollar home is a good start telling me that she really is mentally unheathy and not in touch at all with her reality whatsoever. Her parents house is in foreclosure, she just went through bankruptcy recently, I'm not sure if she's delusional or what's going on but she keeps this up, her kids won't be going home with her.
 
  • #1,195
IF this is a repeat sorry, haven't read all the posts:

it’s her mother who is working behind the scenes and handling any financial arrangement. (Splash’s comment, “Unfortunately we cannot give out any information.”)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29267514
Scoop
 
  • #1,196
TY Carrington. Her mother? I wondered why the sudden turn around of now full acceptance of her daughters unconciable behaviour. Her mom now sees the babies as money makers as well?!! :frown:

Poor little souls.
 
  • #1,197
IF this is a repeat sorry, haven't read all the posts:

it’s her mother who is working behind the scenes and handling any financial arrangement. (Splash’s comment, “Unfortunately we cannot give out any information.”)

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29267514
Scoop

I haven't seen this one, Carrington.

It leads me to believe that Angela and Nadya/Natalie are truly playing "two ends against the middle". Which ever one of them garners sympathy and donations means that all will profit in the end. If I am correct, I hope they spend wisely now as much of this could dry up in the future.
 
  • #1,198
TY Carrington. Her mother? I wondered why the sudden turn around of now full acceptance of her daughters unconciable behaviour. Her mom now sees the babies as money makers as well?!! :frown:

Poor little souls.

Aww, PattyCake! Angela softened me too. She isn't in full acceptance, I really believe she was "in it" from the git go. (I am so cynical!)
:blowkiss:
 
  • #1,199
Aww, PattyCake! Angela softened me too. She isn't in full acceptance, I really believe she was "in it" from the git go. (I am so cynical!)
:blowkiss:

You aren't alone. Hinkey stuff from all involved. But they will please to know that I would never contribute to their causes no matter how contrite they deem themselves.I think the state will come in eventually but when is eventually?
 
  • #1,200
I assume Nadya would know if the kids were in the process of being removed from her care, no? Or does the CPS do everything quietly and then go take custody? I'm not sure how things work in the USA.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
115
Guests online
3,567
Total visitors
3,682

Forum statistics

Threads
632,667
Messages
18,630,016
Members
243,241
Latest member
Kieiru
Back
Top