K_Z
Verified Anesthetist
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2010
- Messages
- 6,657
- Reaction score
- 2,507
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 49
All phone records, including calls sent and received, voicemails, and text messages from
any phones utilized by Adam Shacknai, including but not limited to all phones owned by him
between July 11, 2011 and July 13, 1011.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 50
All phone records, including calls sent and received voicemails, and text messages from
any phones utilized by Jonah Shacknai, including but not limited to all phones owned by him, between July 11, 2011 and July 13, 1011.
BBM. (Obvious typos notwithstanding....maybe someone needs to sharpen their vigorous blue pencil again and start editing....)
This is from the Responses to the Request For Production of Documents Set Two:
https://roa.sdcourt.ca.gov/roa/face..._for_Production_of_Document_1432176274187.pdf
So, this request for phone records is FROM Dina and her attorney, TO the Plaintiffs.
Why exactly is it the responsibility of the Plaintiffs to provide phone records of one of the defendants, TO another of the defendants??
That just sounds beyond absurd to me. As absurd as it would be for DINA to ask the Plaintiffs to provide her with her OWN phone records, lol! Why exactly is it that Dina and her attorney feel it is appropriate in any way for them to try to compel a co-defendant's phone records?
And as far as Jonah's phone records, isn't that more appropriately handled by serving him and his phone carrier with a subpoena?
How is it that Dina and her attorneys suspect that the Plaintiffs even HAVE these records??
This whole line of thought just seems beyond absurd to me. If Dina wants Adam's phone records, she and her attorney should just call up Adam and his attorney and ASK for them. And if they say "no", then subpoena them. I don't understand at all why the plaintiffs are even being asked to do this.
Maybe I'll copy this over to the legal questions thread.
ETA: I'm unable to edit and insert a comma between "Adam" and "Jonah" in the header box. Only Adam is a defendant.