I can supply MANY:
1. "The sheriff has determined that cell phone evidence and video cameras at the hospital confirmed that Jonah Shacknai was at the hospital standing vigil for Max the entire time when Rebecca Zahau’s suicide occurred.
Video cameras at the hospital also showed Dina was there during that time period."
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...bysitter*rebecca*zahau*s*death*no*murder.html
2. In the audio interview of Nina Romano, she states that
Dina had nurses as witnesses and was also on surveillance footage.
http://www.cbs8.com/story/15145788/sister?clienttype=printable
3. In Ann Rules "Two Strange Deaths in Coronado"
written with the input of Anne Bremner and Mary Zahau), she states on page 214:
"The bicyclist must have been mistaken. Numerous witnesses place Dina in the hospital at Max's bedside throughout Tuesday night.
"She (Ann Rule) did not travel to Coronado or to Arizona, where Shacknai lives, to conduct her research, Rule said, but talked extensively with Zahau's loved ones, who believe she was killed. She also has a long*time friendship with Seattle attorney Anne Bremner, who is representing."
http://patch.com/california/coronado/celebrated*author*ann*rule*turns*her*attention*to*spraecafa7a51
4. From A Boy Interrupted, Phoenix Magazine, Aug. 2012
"Dina says she got the news at the hospital. Jonah was sobbing. he said, Rebecca's killed herself," Dina recalls. As Dina was leaving the hospital, a Coronado police detective paid her a visit. "Are you aware of what happened?" he asked.
The detective would have confirmed at that time with the nurses that Dina had been there all night, IMO.
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/loc...u*Spreckels*Mansion*2011*Death*303178091.html
5. However, regardless of our lack of complete information thus far, I could not comment on Mr. Greer's statement as I was with my son Maxie at Rady’s Hospital in Pediatric Intensive Care, praying for his recovery, and watching him fight for his life, trying to breathe on his own while on a ventilator.”
She adds:
“It would be impossible for me to hear any disturbances at Jonah's home as I was with our son alone at a hospital miles away. As well, my sister, Nina was with her son, and our close friend, none of whom heard a disturbance as they were five blocks from Jonah's house on Ocean Blvd.
My sister and I would again publicly like to extend, for the fourth time since 2012, our offer to share all of the information we have with the Zahau’s and ask that they reciprocate. Perhaps an exchange of accurate data could help both families find answers, healing, and resolution.”
Source:
http://www.nbcsandiego.com/news/loc...nsion*2011*Death*303178091.html#ixzz3fL53Fpju
And some of my favorite points from Dina's incredible Demurrer:
pg. 4 Memorandum of Points and Authorities
1. Introduction "Defendants were careful to remove any evidence of their involvement." It may be a parapraxis, but its an admission nonetheless:
Plaintiffs admit they have no evidence that defendants were involved in any alleged murder.
II Summary of Argument The Court should sustain this demurrer because every claim against Ms. Shacknai is premised exclusively on charging
allegations that are made "on-information-and-belief,' all of which are either not supported by any information at all, or upon information which in no way connects Ms. Shacknai, or the other defendants, as having done the things alleged, or upon other allegations that are themselves also insufficiently made" on-information-and-belief." Plantiiffs' allegations are therefore insufficient as a matter of law.
Additionally Ms. Shacknai demurrers specially to the second cause of actions for Battery on the grounds that it is legally uncertain
because it alleges in the disjunctive that Ms. Shacknai may not have committed a battery on decedent.
IV Plandtiffs' first cause of action is for Wrongful Death.
But Plaintiffs specifically allege that "Adam chocked Rebecca to death." So the only way the Plaintiffs can state a viable claim against Ms. Shacknai for Wrongful Death is if Plaintiffs' allegations establish that she is potentially vicariously liable based on Plaintiffs' conspiracy allegations.
pg. 6. line 21
Thus the first question is whether Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged the basis for their belief that Adam killed decedent. Without sufficiently alleging a basis for that belief, Plaintiffs' claim for Wrongful Death against Ms. Shacknai necessarily fails because Ms. Shacknai cannot be liable as a co-conspirator if the basis of the allegation that the person alleged to be directly liable of the underlying tort is legally insufficient.
Here, Plaintiffs allege that the basis of their believe that Adam killed decedent is "the injuries sustained by Rebecca on the amount of strength needed to create such injury. But that information does not in any way logical or rationally connect Adam to decedent's death. This information does not tell us why Adam, as opposed to anyone else, killed decedent. It excludes literaly anyone in the world who has the same or greater strength than Adam as someone who could have killed the decedent. The alleged basis for the belief is a non-sequitur relative to the allegation.
Of course, the reason the purported information does not have any rational relation to the charging allegation is
because Plaintiffs admit that in fact, theyt have no facts to allege in support of the assertion that Adam killed decedent. The qualifying allegation that defendants
removed all of the evidence has no basis at all and therefore it cannot be accepted as true.
Which leaves us with the simple and unavoidable conclusion that Plaintiffs have no evidence - no facts - to base this or another charging allegation or claim against Ms. Shacknai or any other defendant. The law requires that this conclusion be reached because it is a judicial admission of a fact that is conclusively deemed true against the pleader.
pg 8 line 4. The problem with this is that the very allegations that Dina and Nina were involved at all, or were even in the
house at all on the morning of decedent's death, amoung other things are themselves allegation-made-on-information-and-belief without a sufficient, rational basis; it's the allegation-made-on-information-and-belief
equivalent of double and triple and quadruple hearsay...
V. Conclusion
Ms. Shacknai takes very seriously Plaintiffs' admission that they have no evidence in support of the involvement of any defendant in any alleged murder of decedent. It is a quintessential parapraxis.
And it's the reason Plaintiffs have pled their complaint the way they have. Its literally impossible that Plaintiffs have any information to support the allegations they are making. Plaintiffs of course,
have the entire investigatory files from the investigating agencies and they therefore are able to pilfer any and all facts from the investigations that they believe implicates Ms. Shacknai and the other defendants. Y
et the only charging allegation concerning Ms. Shacknai that is not based on information and belief is that of a witness who thinks he saw her outside the house on the evening before the morning that decedent was found dead. That alone cannot save Plaintifs' complaint. The demurrer should be sustained.
The Zahaus case will be thrown out of court, because they have no evidence...their allegations only exist as true in the minds of their small group of followers. I really think the Zahaus know Rebecca committed suicide...and have known all along - it has all been about $$$$$$$$.
