- Joined
- Jul 20, 2015
- Messages
- 940
- Reaction score
- 10,788
...on a Sunday.First I thought they had phoned in advance and tod them what was needed so they just came to collect the results of their phonecall. But 3 agents?
...on a Sunday.First I thought they had phoned in advance and tod them what was needed so they just came to collect the results of their phonecall. But 3 agents?
No he was not there. He just gave a brief statement to reporter BE ( probably by text ).Did I catch it right that their lawyer was at the house for the 3 minute FBI ? Isn’t that odd?
Sounds like maybe they found visually unidentifiable human remains and/or possibly testing animal bottoms or leavings? Nicest way I could think to say it.https://twitter.com/wflajosh/status/1442192650698956802?s=21
NEW VIDEO. The #FBI entered the #Laundrie house for 3 minutes. According to their attorney: The FBI requested some personal items belonging to #BrianLaundrie to assist them with #DNA matching and Brian’s parents provided the FBI with what they could. (via @BrianEntin)
This is some high-quality sleuthing! Interesting!
It's very hard for me to imagine why her parents were asked not to talk about it, though LE certainly has their reasons.
This was my thought too!Sounds like they found visually unidentifiable human remains and/or possibly testing animal bottoms or leavings? Nicest way I could think to say it.
Laundries may have consulted w their lawyer by phone when agents arrived, or before, don't know, but I would have. He could have told them to demand a search warrant, but must have told them to just hand the stuff over. JMOFirst I thought they had phoned in advance and tod them what was needed so they just came to collect the results of their phonecall. But 3 agents?
I would bet that the FBI gave their attorney a heads-up before going to the house. The attorney probably told them and coached them about how to handle the encounter. (MOO, but once people are represented by counsel, that's generally how it works).Laundries may have consulted w their lawyer by phone when agents arrived, don't know, but I would have. He could have told them to demand a search warrant, but must have told them to just hand the stuff over. JMO
They'd sit them down for a DNA test though, would they not? Oral swab? Would take longer than 3 minutes, I imagine?Things handed over by the parent would likely also now include the parents DNA.
IF they found supplies or something hidden somewhere, this could possibly help confirm or deny the parents had also been in that location or handled the items. JMO - and I could be completely off base
This is interesting. I had assumed she had already been cremated.
Parent here, responding from my perspective. I say these things, but I believe that what it means (to me) is I would do anything for my child to live a full, happy, healthy life. I want them to be good people.
In the face of danger or struggle, I would do anything to help them. I will love them unconditionally, but that does not mean I will accept or excuse poor behavior from them; it means I DO hold them accountable for their actions because I believe in their goodness and ability to be functional, good, moral humans. Love is not blind, IMHO.
I can't know what these parents' experience of their kid coming home was, but I guarantee you that if my child was in this situation I would not be enabling them in any way. Supporting them to find a lawyer and mental health team? Probably. That's my job because I raised them and whatever problems they have/cause I share responsibility in (to a degree). But what the Laundrie's appear to be doing is not normal parenting, and it's not even love if you ask me.
Eta: I often tell my littles "I love you too much to allow you to behave this way," and I feel like that explains what I'm getting at here.
The morning of the Memorial......on a Sunday.
Or both parents DNA. They could match it up through the parents.Perhaps a hair brush, tooth brush, razor etc. Also the atty could say it's for just about anything at this point and it's not like the FBI will confirm or deny during an open investigation.

I am curious about the female Ranger's bodycam footage. I understand not everything is released but I am beginning to wonder if something was said or done during that discussion that may be part of the investigation. Mild speculation. MOOI think so, too. While the female LEO’s footage is unavailable to us, she seemed very concerned about GP. Perhaps she was aware of the non/Chris call? However, once everything was sorted, and before the matter was closed, they could have interviewed BL again. They knew where he was.