Reynolds argued that Finnegan, an eight-year-old golden retriever, has no independent income, resides exclusively with her and has annual expenses exceeding $5,000 – all requirements for a legal human dependent under IRS rules.
While the IRS defines pets as property, Reynolds says this does not reflect Finnegan’s role in their household,
according to QZ.
“For all intents and purposes, Finnegan is like my daughter, and is definitely a ‘dependent,’” the case reads, noting that while the subject may seem unusual, it is “not frivolous or meritless.”
The woman argued that her dog ‘is like my daughter’ and ‘definitely’ a dependent
www.the-independent.com