Zach Adams on trial for the kidnapping and murder of Holly Bobo Sept 20 & 21, 2017

[JenaTaoson]

Oh she's talking about Jason Autry's vocabulary.

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910917236805824512]https://twitter.com/WSMVCarley/status/910917236805824512[/video]

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Carley Gordon‏Verified account @WSMVCarley 44s44 seconds ago

Defense: anyone who has a .32 revolver knows that bullet wouldn't go all the way through her head #HollyBobo

Of course it would if he shot her at contact range right up against her head. I have seen other cases where a .32 was the murder weapon and there was an entry and exit wound caused by the bullet to the victim's head.

 

[Mightymight]

Ooooh! Has the state brought that up?? Excellent point. I never thought of that!

Yup. Did in closing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[turaj]

why doesn't the judge stop her it has passed 1 hr

[video=twitter;910916607861510144]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910916607861510144[/video]

i think a one hour time limit may be suggested but that is tough in a case like this......she is literally out of breath and wants to bring up everything ...I mean everything instead of honing it down to a reasonable story that could be followed. Hard for a judge to stop a defense attorney in a dp fighting for her client's life.

 

[epiphany]

Leah Beth Bolton‏ @LeahBethFOX13 52s53 seconds ago

Defense playing audio of Autry saying "allegedly" throughout testimony. Played two different times #HollyBobo

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910917586912780289]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910917586912780289[/video]

[video=twitter;910917580310933504]https://twitter.com/bchapman_WREG3/status/910917580310933504[/video]

[video=twitter;910917696115679232]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910917696115679232[/video]

 

[epiphany]

Leah Beth Bolton‏ @LeahBethFOX13 1m1 minute ago

Defense explaining "allegedly" is not a word witnesses typically use, saying law enforcement uses that word #HollyBobo

 

[turaj]

she just figures she will keep throwing out stuff hoping that something creates doubt for one person....I bet she does not even expect a complete acquittal but fighting for his life and no possible dp.

 

[turaj]

Leah Beth Bolton‏ @LeahBethFOX13 1m1 minute ago

Defense explaining "allegedly" is not a word witnesses typically use, saying law enforcement uses that word #HollyBobo

that actually makes sense to me. one point for def.

 

[SteveS]

why doesn't the judge stop her it has passed 1 hr

Judge didn't give the defense atty adequate time to show all the holes in the state's case, so the jury could be sure and see and understand them when they deliberate a DP case? Would be compelling grounds for new trial, if he was convicted, on appeal. She is not being repetitious, and is covering ground quickly. But there's a LOT needing to be said.

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910918355363799040]https://twitter.com/_KCummings_/status/910918355363799040[/video]

[video=twitter;910918608720678912]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910918608720678912[/video]

 

[Madeleine74]

Ooooh! Has the state brought that up?? Excellent point. I never thought of that!

Yes!

Very clearly. More than once. If you haven't watched Hagerman's closing, do so when you get a chance! It was masterful, simple, straight forward, and powerful without any yelling involved.

 

[epiphany]

that actually makes sense to me. one point for def.

Except I think it was obvious to the jury that Autry has a very good vocabulary

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910918956004888580]https://twitter.com/_KCummings_/status/910918956004888580[/video]

 

[Madeleine74]

Judge didn't give the defense atty adequate time to show all the holes in the state's case, so the jury could be sure and see and understand them when they deliberate a DP case? Would be compelling grounds for new trial, if he was convicted, on appeal. She is not being repetitious, and is covering ground quickly. But there's a LOT needing to be said.

FYI, closing arguments are not evidence. Neither are opening statements. And, neither are the attorney's questions during the trial. Only the witnesses answers are considered evidence, along with items marked as evidence for the jury (photos, recordings, documents, etc etc). As such a judge is perfectly within their right to set a limit on time for closing arguments and can strictly enforce it if they want, without it being trial error.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

that actually makes sense to me. one point for def.

All it shows me is JA has been in the criminal system for awhile and knows the speak-isms.

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910919670324240384]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910919670324240384[/video]

[video=twitter;910919942664572929]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910919942664572929[/video]

[video=twitter;910919701806673922]https://twitter.com/_KCummings_/status/910919701806673922[/video]

 

[Emi]

[video=twitter;910920025464344578]https://twitter.com/burtstaggsnews/status/910920025464344578[/video]

[video=twitter;910920182570332160]https://twitter.com/LeahBethFOX13/status/910920182570332160[/video]

 

[popsicle]

that actually makes sense to me. one point for def.

He also asked the judge if he could approach when he wanted to go up to the exhibit or something that the def lawyer had.

He is a career criminal, he knows these terms.