Agent Booth from the TBI testified that they got a phone call in January or February of 2014 that focused their attention back on these 4.
are there any educated guesses out there as to who that call was from? Could it have been Natalie?
Agent Booth from the TBI testified that they got a phone call in January or February of 2014 that focused their attention back on these 4.
I'll be super clear when I say, The reason I find Zachary Adams GUILTY in this case is not because I am just trying to pin this on SOMEONE just because we need to find someone to do it.
I believe:
A). I am a critical thinker - yes, in opposition to a post here, you can believe ZA is guilty in this case and be a critical thinker at the same time. We are all of our own opinions.
B) you can be a woman, and not be emotionally drawn to "pinning" this crime on any random person (I would never do that.)
C) I hardly think these 4 were just chosen. They all implicated themselves (albeit I need to study Shayne's one time immunity revoked), but Dylan and Autry are absolutely clear. You don't make up that you were a part of a murder case just to see if someone will stick you with the death penalty or life in jail.
D) If you determine not guilty, you do have to consider multiple witnesses took the stand, saying ZA claimed guilt. I can't, in good conscious throw out all those witnesses testimony and think every convo Zach had with these folks is bragging. I don't buy that. Corey? Nope. If you are saying guilty you don't believe one of them. In addition to the fact that he said "no gun, no body" 4 months before she was found. I believe yes, that Zachary Adams was proud he did it. Even more reason he should not get away with a "not guilty".
B) IMHO, I believe Shayne took her ---not someone "other than the 4". This was corroborated by Candace, the Coon Hunt, he sketch drawn of him matching his picture and overall Clint's description. There is a bigger deal at play to me here as far as the actual abduction and these details don't have to be perfect to make me think he is less than absolutely guilty of the crime.
I will repeat that ----the details we don't have of the actual abduction part do not have to be there to make Zachary Adams guilty. There is enough corroborated evidence leading up to the abduction and after the abduction to convict.
C) I am praying this is not a hung jury. But with the passion expressed on both sides here, it seems there are some passionate folks on both sides.
If Zachary Adams walks, for me, it is as bad as OJ walking but worse because there are 4
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why did Britt tell LE to go ahead and charge him for Holly's abduction? I must have missed this.
I just watched and listened to the testimony of Karen Bobo.
When Zach said "that was Shayne", to me that was a confession of sorts.
I'll be super clear when I say, The reason I find Zachary Adams GUILTY in this case is not because I am just trying to pin this on SOMEONE just because we need to find someone to do it.
I believe:
A). I am a critical thinker - yes, in opposition to a post here, you can believe ZA is guilty in this case and be a critical thinker at the same time. We are all of our own opinions.
B) you can be a woman, and not be emotionally drawn to "pinning" this crime on any random person (I would never do that.)
C) I hardly think these 4 were just chosen. They all implicated themselves (albeit I need to study Shayne's one time immunity revoked), but Dylan and Autry are absolutely clear. You don't make up that you were a part of a murder case just to see if someone will stick you with the death penalty or life in jail.
D) If you determine not guilty, you do have to consider multiple witnesses took the stand, saying ZA claimed guilt. I can't, in good conscious throw out all those witnesses testimony and think every convo Zach had with these folks is bragging. I don't buy that. Corey? Nope. If you are saying guilty you don't believe one of them. In addition to the fact that he said "no gun, no body" 4 months before she was found. I believe yes, that Zachary Adams was proud he did it. Even more reason he should not get away with a "not guilty".
B) IMHO, I believe Shayne took her ---not someone "other than the 4". This was corroborated by Candace, the Coon Hunt, he sketch drawn of him matching his picture and overall Clint's description. There is a bigger deal at play to me here as far as the actual abduction and these details don't have to be perfect to make me think he is less than absolutely guilty of the crime.
I will repeat that ----the details we don't have of the actual abduction part do not have to be there to make Zachary Adams guilty. There is enough corroborated evidence leading up to the abduction and after the abduction to convict.
C) I am praying this is not a hung jury. But with the passion expressed on both sides here, it seems there are some passionate folks on both sides.
If Zachary Adams walks, for me, it is as bad as OJ walking but worse because there are 4 individuals.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I just watched and listened to the testimony of Karen Bobo.
Karen Bobo testified that their family had received phone calls from people naming the four charged as possible suspects.
In July 2011, Karen and Clint met with Zach Adams at his home. There were two things that stuck out to her, as Karen testified.
One was that when Zach asked Clint to describe the man he saw that morning, Clint described him. Then Zach replied "that was Shayne."
The second thing that Karen testified to was that Zach made a point of telling her that he could use one person's cell phone and make it look like it was coming from someone else's cell phone.
The first point, to me, is intriguing. My question is - why in the world would Zach state that "it was Shayne". Considering that a majority of turkey hunters wore camo, why would Zach mention Shayne?
This really sticks out to me.
Karen Bobo testified that she spoke with Dicus on a daily basis. She also stated that by August 2011, she (Karen Bobo) had met with all four of the accused.
I find it terribly sad that T.B.I. dropped the ball so early on in the investigation. These names were out there, pings were analyzed and yet as one T.B.I. agent said, they didn't even follow up on the possible suspects' alibis.
To me, this is sad for the Bobo family because this case could have possibly been solved back in 2011. It is apparent to me that Dicus "stalled" this investigation and because of this - caused extra years of heartbreak for the Bobo family.
I find Karen Bobo's testimony to be truthful and I am astonished that she and her family were on the right "track" and yet T.B.I. seemed to have such "tunnel vision" and didn't listen to her.
When Zach said "that was Shayne", to me that was a confession of sorts.
On speculation of what TBI got on Jan. 14, 2014..... the video tape. They were looking for it based on Corey's testimony. We never saw Zach's computer. I think someone in TBI found it. They viewed it. And set to getting the evidence lined up. Taped was excluded for some reason.
[video=twitter;911232236665671682]https://twitter.com/NC5_ChrisConte/status/911232236665671682[/video]
Judge will give family and media 30 minutes before announcing verdict
zencompass said:Dear Niner,
You are a treasure.
Over the years, whichever thread or topic I find myself in, you always go the extra distance in your wonderful way of setting out pertinent information so that it is clearer and in one place.
Your detail and time consuming work along with the compassion in all of your posts lifts my heart as I know it does others'.
My great appreciation for everything you do is shared by countless kind-hearted folks on this website.
Thank you so much!
Rayemonde said:snipped by me....
Does anyone else find it unlikely that these men were driving around with what was obviously a body in the back of their truck, then possibly dismembering and scattering body parts in different locations, whilst there was an amber alert and hundreds of people were searching by for Holly? They'd have to be pretty lucky for no one at all to spot them acting suspiciously.