Sarah ~ yep, I'm not sure what to think of her tweets .... but I agree with you that I think it's all about keeping up with the "outrage" and keeping the public engaged. "Elsewhere" I see posters literally picking apart every word she tweets... and it does seem that the tweets that are confusing and/or have spelling/grammar issues are the one's she delete's later LOL Sometimes she rewords it... sometimes not. I don't necessarily take every word she tweets as gospel, but as someone that thinks there was issues with the investigation and trial, it is somewhat reassuring that she is doing something, and throws a crumb or 2 out to her followers.
I have wondered the same about whether she has ever walked away from a case, and I still don't know the answer LOL I would be curious too. I do think that she chooses her cases very carefully and we need to remember that she did have at least some of the case files before the documentary every came out.... SA's girlfriend had been in touch with her long before, and I have no doubt that the documentary and the media attention to the case was her deciding factor.
I do admit.... at this point, if she walked away, I would 100% think that SA was guilty, only because of what I have read about her and how she vowed never to defend a guilty person again. I have to wonder if the people that think he is 100% guilty right now would feel the same if she is successful in exonerating him, and would believe it? I doubt it ;-) (kind of like the PB case... there are people that still believe he did it regardless of him being exonerated)
I also think that between her, Strang, Buting, BD's lawyers, using this particular case to highlight the problems with the justice system cannot be a bad thing overall, and it has brought a lot of attention to false confessions, how cases are handled depending on your social standing, etc.
As for the cryptic tweets.... I would have to go back and look, but the only one's that I can think of that pointed at any specific groups was the one about the people close to her.... and then maybe about LE planting evidence? I have read far FAR worse elsewhere.... and facebook... and then there are some crazy people that blog some pretty ridiculous scenarios..... it's those people/readers/crazies that I would be concerned about, not vague KZ tweets IMO I'm not so sure her tweets are cryptic... or everyone is making them seem cryptic by picking them apart ... example... #checkaduhid LOL
Anyway, JMO and all that.... I'm having fun with her tweets, I like that she throws a crumb or 2.... but ultimately, it's not evidence, and I don't ever expect her to show her hand on twitter.... I will wait to see what she files when she files it
I have wondered the same about whether she has ever walked away from a case, and I still don't know the answer LOL I would be curious too. I do think that she chooses her cases very carefully and we need to remember that she did have at least some of the case files before the documentary every came out.... SA's girlfriend had been in touch with her long before, and I have no doubt that the documentary and the media attention to the case was her deciding factor.
I do admit.... at this point, if she walked away, I would 100% think that SA was guilty, only because of what I have read about her and how she vowed never to defend a guilty person again. I have to wonder if the people that think he is 100% guilty right now would feel the same if she is successful in exonerating him, and would believe it? I doubt it ;-) (kind of like the PB case... there are people that still believe he did it regardless of him being exonerated)
I also think that between her, Strang, Buting, BD's lawyers, using this particular case to highlight the problems with the justice system cannot be a bad thing overall, and it has brought a lot of attention to false confessions, how cases are handled depending on your social standing, etc.
As for the cryptic tweets.... I would have to go back and look, but the only one's that I can think of that pointed at any specific groups was the one about the people close to her.... and then maybe about LE planting evidence? I have read far FAR worse elsewhere.... and facebook... and then there are some crazy people that blog some pretty ridiculous scenarios..... it's those people/readers/crazies that I would be concerned about, not vague KZ tweets IMO I'm not so sure her tweets are cryptic... or everyone is making them seem cryptic by picking them apart ... example... #checkaduhid LOL
Anyway, JMO and all that.... I'm having fun with her tweets, I like that she throws a crumb or 2.... but ultimately, it's not evidence, and I don't ever expect her to show her hand on twitter.... I will wait to see what she files when she files it
