Zellner Tweets

[Deleted member 39678]

links to this article:
http://www.postcrescent.com/story/n...ish-scientist-break-open-avery-case/92459398/

Thanks for the link. Below the Swedish scientist article under "Other Making a Murderer Headlines" I found link to a recent AMA with Dan O'Donnell that I found to be very interesting.

 

[angelainwi]

Thanks for the link. Below the Swedish scientist article under "Other Making a Murderer Headlines" I found link to a recent AMA with Dan O'Donnell that I found to be very interesting.

Do you have a link? I just tried to find and had little luck.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Do you have a link? I just tried to find and had little luck.

Sure thing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/StevenAveryIsGuilty/comments/5812l8/ama_dan_odonnell/

 

[missy1974]

Thanks for the link. Below the Swedish scientist article under "Other Making a Murderer Headlines" I found link to a recent AMA with Dan O'Donnell that I found to be very interesting.

Yep, he did that earlier this week. It was too bad it was heavily moderated and since it was hosted on the "Steven Avery is Guilty" subreddit, they didn't allow any really "tough" questions. I quit reading it the other day when he admitted to not looking at any of the thousands of pages of documents that have been released. He has so many of the facts wrong, it's hard to take him seriously at all. Reminds me of Griesbach. JMO

Contrary to popular belief, I actually read at the Steven Avery is Guilty sub over there because I really am open to plausible scenario's or explanations for things that I have questions about, whether it points to SA's guilt or innocence. Unfortunately, I'm still searching... :biggrin:

ETA: if anyone is interested, there was an AMA with Griesbach too **** removed link ****

ETA2: I removed the link in case it is not allowed as pointed out by CoolJ.

 

[CoolJ]

Sure thing.

https://www.reddit.com/r/StevenAveryIsGuilty/comments/5812l8/ama_dan_odonnell/

I don't believe this link is allowed on here.
But definitely interesting. Dan O'donnell's comments are laughable in how little he understands in this case and the assumptions he makes. JMO

 

[missy1974]

I don't believe this link is allowed on here.
But definitely interesting. Dan O'donnell's comments are laughable in how little he understands in this case and the assumptions he makes. JMO

oops LOL I just shared another similar link!

But I agree with your assessment ;-)

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Yep, he did that earlier this week. It was too bad it was heavily moderated and since it was hosted on the "Steven Avery is Guilty" subreddit, they didn't allow any really "tough" questions. I quit reading it the other day when he admitted to not looking at any of the thousands of pages of documents that have been released. He has so many of the facts wrong, it's hard to take him seriously at all. Reminds me of Griesbach. JMO

Contrary to popular belief, I actually read at the Steven Avery is Guilty sub over there because I really am open to plausible scenario's or explanations for things that I have questions about, whether it points to SA's guilt or innocence. Unfortunately, I'm still searching... :biggrin:

ETA: if anyone is interested, there was an AMA with Griesbach too https://www.reddit.com/r/StevenAveryIsGuilty/comments/55a1eu/ama_michael_griesbach/

I don't know much about Dan O' Donnell but he apparently covered this case and attended the trial so I'm taking what he has to say seriously.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Reddit links aren't allowed anymore? I thought that Reddit and blogs are allowed on the Avery forum only but not on the rest of Websleuths. I'm confused.

 

[missy1974]

I don't know much about Dan O' Donnell but he apparently covered this case and attended the trial so I'm taking what he has to say seriously.

hmmm he gets simple facts wrong and believes that not taking pictures of a crime scene are pretty standard. The latter is reason enough for me to not take anything he says seriously. Again, JMO.

 

[missy1974]

Reddit links aren't allowed anymore? I thought that Reddit and blogs are allowed on the Avery forum only but not on the rest of Websleuths. I'm confused.

I'm really not sure. I'm thinking the links to the AMA's should be okay, and you got the first link from an article that linked it as well.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

hmmm he gets simple facts wrong and believes that not taking pictures of a crime scene are pretty standard. The latter is reason enough for me to not take anything he says seriously. Again, JMO.

Nobody's perfect. I did find his comments interesting and thought provoking.

 

[CoolJ]

Reddit links aren't allowed anymore? I thought that Reddit and blogs are allowed on the Avery forum only but not on the rest of Websleuths. I'm confused.

You could be right on that. I am not sure. I was speaking websleuths in general. Hopefully we can, I think missy1974 had a great one rebutting Danny O

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I'm really not sure. I'm thinking the links to the AMA's should be okay, and you got the first link from an article that linked it as well.

The way I handle posts that I'm not sure are in violation of TOS is to alert the post and ask a Mod if it's okay or not.

If it stays it's okay, if it's gone then you know it's not okay. JMO

 

[CoolJ]

hmmm he gets simple facts wrong and believes that not taking pictures of a crime scene are pretty standard. The latter is reason enough for me to not take anything he says seriously. Again, JMO.

He is just just repeating verbatim the Ken Kratz fairy tale version of events. Assuming he is an honest reporter, I question his intelligence.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

You could be right on that. I am not sure. I was speaking websleuths in general. Hopefully we can, I think missy1974 had a great one rebutting Danny O

I don't agree that Reddit and blogs belong on this forum, I only provided the link because I've seen numerous links and photos from Reddit here and said what the hell, why not.

 

[dexter75]

I don't believe this link is allowed on here.
But definitely interesting. Dan O'donnell's comments are laughable in how little he understands in this case and the assumptions he makes. JMO

Agree
IMO D.O. is ignorant & narrow minded re many aspects of this case. Seems to me like some folks, he has had his mind made up & unfortunately when they do there is no changing it.

 

[dexter75]

Yep, he did that earlier this week. It was too bad it was heavily moderated and since it was hosted on the "Steven Avery is Guilty" subreddit, they didn't allow any really "tough" questions. I quit reading it the other day when he admitted to not looking at any of the thousands of pages of documents that have been released. He has so many of the facts wrong, it's hard to take him seriously at all. Reminds me of Griesbach. JMO

Contrary to popular belief, I actually read at the Steven Avery is Guilty sub over there because I really am open to plausible scenario's or explanations for things that I have questions about, whether it points to SA's guilt or innocence. Unfortunately, I'm still searching... :biggrin:

ETA: if anyone is interested, there was an AMA with Griesbach too **** removed link ****

ETA2: I removed the link in case it is not allowed as pointed out by CoolJ.

No disrespect to anyone here, seriously?:facepalm:...
This man who calls himself a reporter ( also a lawyer ) is going to offer his perspective on a case while putting himself out there as well BUT WAIT...per HIS OWN WORDS the SPAM FILTER WILL BE SET TO HIGH and ALL comments & questions will be HEAVILY MODERATED ...
He then goes on and on ( giving HIS take on the case ) while admitting no, he hasn't read much.. if any of the case files:waitasec:

 

[Limaes]

I find DO's views interesting. From what I have seen around the web, there are some aggressive case enthusiasts out there and I don't blame anyone for wanting to weed them out of a serious discussion.

 

[BigCityAccountant]

A jab at Wisconsin States Attorney. Cook County States Attorney has no fear in righting a wrong. Cook County has a Conviction Integrity Unit now.

In 2012, Ms. Alvarez formed the first-ever Conviction Integrity Unit in the State’s Attorney’s Office to bring a new focus to the review of post-conviction cases and those that involve questionable convictions. The unit conducts ongoing reviews and re-investigations of cases in which claims of innocence have been made or new information has been discovered about potential wrongful convictions. Following extensive conviction integrity investigations, State’s Attorney Alvarez has vacated the convictions of 13 individuals since the unit was created.

State’s Attorney Alvarez thanked the members of the Conviction Integrity Unit and the Cold Case Unit as well as investigators with the Chicago Police Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation for their dedicated work on the case.
“This case reminds us in a very painful way that we must continue to put our best proactive efforts toward the investigation of wrongful convictions and do everything that we possibly can to correct the mistakes of the past,” said Alvarez.

“On behalf of the Cook County criminal justice system, we offer apologies to Mark Maxson and his family for this horrific ordeal as well as sympathies to the family members of Lindsey Murdock who have endured an exceptionally difficult and painful journey towards justice in the senseless and heinous murder of their beloved child.”

http://www.statesattorney.org/press_ManChargedDecadesOldMurder.html

 

[missy1974]

Thanks for posting that BCA, I did screenshot it and was going to post the other day but it was when the site was down for maintenance and then I forgot!