seagull65
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2008
- Messages
- 2,667
- Reaction score
- 0
And therefore by you, no doubt.
No, I'm not 100% convinced, there were so many unanswered questions. I always wondered why Casey would have started telling the Zanny story way back in 2006, plus the many unanswered questions and coincidences, plus of course we heard testimony from YM in the trial stating that there had supposedly NOT been any security video of Sawgrass on that date after all (during the case he'd maintained to Casey A that they had video of the complex on that date and she wasn't on it). So I always wondered whether there weren't a few more shreds of truth to the stories than ever got pinned down, I find it still a bit mysterious even now. Imagine if he was just trying to bluff her out by saying he had video of the complex and she wasn't there on that date, but she actually was. Imagine if you'd been there but the police were telling you they had video that you weren't there. What would you think? I don't know if it's possible that she could have gone by there at any time on that date, or who else in the story could have. We'd have to look closely at her pings all over again. Of course they didn't track pings on everyone. And in the end, pings only show where your phone is of course.. But I know a lot of us basically ruled out her having been at Sawgrass because of the detectives' comments during her police interviews regarding the video.