LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
In my opinion, these things only work against ZG's civil case. Similarities with KC aren't what is in this suit.
ZG is clearly not a 10.
ZG has tattoo's.
The number of children and ages didn't add up.
All that matters is, IS she THE ZG. No she is not.
I may eat crow I have before but I believe that if the case does go to trial the FL judicial system is seeking revenge.
None of that matters because it was all before the jailhouse tape. In that tape KC had the opportunity to tell her mother that this ZG's picture was shown to her and it was not the ZFG and that, in fact, LE never showed her any pictures and especially "that woman from Kissimmee". CA took that to the media and that is what the lawsuit is based on. At this point it clearly becomes intentional on KC's part to implicate ZG. Before that moment ZG had a weak case. It is KC's own undoing here. She had done this to herself and she should have to reconcile this matter in a court of law.
Good lord the woman refused to admit she stole from Amy right up to the day of court. Claimed she was innocent. How bad is that? So would anyone think Amy would be wrong to sue KC for all the damages she has done to Amy? How about JG, RK, JH and the countless others she has involved in this case who did nothing wrong other than know her.