For those of you wondering how Casey could possibly make an argument on appeal that the lying convictions should be entirely set aside for insufficient evidence, my assumption is that the argument will be the same one made by Mason in his motion for directed verdict. (That's the oral motion the defense made after the prosecution rested.) IIRC he said that there was insufficient evidence of the lies because the evidence (Casey's statements) should have been tossed out based on the Miranda warning violation.
Thank you AZ. I personally think this should be his argument.....
To lie, or not to lie, that is the question:
Whether 'tis Nobler in the mind (of FCA) to suffer
The Slings and Arrows of outrageous Fortune, (or the
Florida State Attorney’s office),
Or to take Arms against a Sea of troubles, (All those horrible people STILL trying to persecute the innocent Ms. Anthony),
And by opposing end them (once and for all on a verdict on appeal):
to die, to sleep
No more; and by a sleep, to say we end
The heart-ache, and the thousand Natural shocks (caused by the Pinellas 12 wrong verdict)
That Flesh is heir to? 'Tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wished. To die to sleep,
To sleep, perchance to Dream (of a La Bella Vita lost to FCA forever);
Ay, there's the rub,
For in that sleep of death, what dreams may come (nightmares about Caylee we can only hope),
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause. There's the respect
That makes Calamity of so long life: La Bella Vita