LambChop
Former Member
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2008
- Messages
- 21,160
- Reaction score
- 30
For those of you wondering how Casey could possibly make an argument on appeal that the lying convictions should be entirely set aside for insufficient evidence, my assumption is that the argument will be the same one made by Mason in his motion for directed verdict. (That's the oral motion the defense made after the prosecution rested.) IIRC he said that there was insufficient evidence of the lies because the evidence (Casey's statements) should have been tossed out based on the Miranda warning violation.
But if they showed the video at the hearing of CA's deposition wouldn't there argument be that when KC had the chance to clear ZG's name, she did not with purpose? jmo