If there was a second person involved, imo they just dropped off and picked up, and did not participate in the knifing.
Actually, now that I think about it - it's possible that the driver might not have known the perp intended to kill. What if driver is told that perp is going there to slash...
Were the house parties generally posted in advance on social media? Or did one of the roommates post something along the lines of 'quiet weekend planned' or the like? Killer might have known some time ahead that this was his chance.
If this was all planned ahead of time, it's very possible that there is no white Hyundai.
If the killers car was -for example- black, all he would need to do is sometime before the murders, spray the car with white peel paint. After the murders, peel the paint, and now he has a black car...
I think it's shortsighted to assume the car is white, assuming that it actually was white on the night of the murders. If this was planned in advance, it would be real easy to spray white peel paint over the normal color of the car, then just strip it off after the murders.
In my opinion, E was actually living there and had all or most of his stuff there. I believe the 'visiting' claim was only because he wasn't on the lease and wasn't supposed to be there.
You might be taking 'asleep' too literally. IMO, asleep in this case probably means attack begins while they're both asleep, but the second person in the bed wakes and fights back so technically not asleep but still in bed.
Or like someone who was mad at three of them. I believe E was killed first, as he was the biggest threat, and possibly the main target. After killing E and X, killer went looking for M, who he also had issues with. K just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Someone could be attacked in their sleep and still end up not in bed. Victim might have rolled out of bed trying to get away, attacker could have thrown first victim to the floor to make it easier to get yo the second person, etc.
My feeling is that the roommates found the door locked, and the friend they called was the person most likely to have the lock code - E's brother. If the brother discovered E and X, I'm sure that would be traumatic enough without giving the media a reason to hound him.
I can't imagine that an interior bedroom lock would work that way. Get up in the middle of the night, go to the bathroom, and have to punch in a code to go back to bed? Especially when you've been drinking? I think that in a case like that, most people would leave the door ajar or find a way to...
Given that it was a party house, I imagine the locks on the individual bedrooms were primarily used to keep party goers out of the private rooms. Downstairs roommates may have locked their doors as they got home 'early' and didn't know what the others had planned. The others all got home/went to...
Agreed that there may have been little or no evidence left in the car. Note that in the OJ case, there was very little blood in the vehicle, despite the scene.
If the attack was planned in advance, the car might not even be white. If a really cagey perp had (for example) a black car, they could have wrapped/peel painted it white for the crime, then removed the wrap. It would be a great way to throw LE off.
I strongly suspect that E was there most of the time if not all the time. As in, effectively living there but not on the lease. And it wouldn't shock me if he was the main target.
I wouldn't be surprised if the car 'belongs' to an accomplice. (When I say belongs, I'm including the possibility it might have been borrowed from a friend or relative of the accomplice.) My guess is that it's currently far, far from Idaho, or quite possibly no longer white.
I wonder if law...
Or look at it in the other direction. Would K have still visited if there was a party planned, or did she just want to hang out with her friends? If she came because she knew there was no party, then who else knew that the house wasn't going to be full of people?
If the car is local, then surely by now they know who it belongs to (they may have already known.)
Which to me indicates either:
1. Car was stolen some time before murders, and they don't know who was driving it that night.
2. They want to know if car was used to stalk victims in the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.